Australian Politics Forum - Why are the left protecting Pedophiles.

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 37016
Gender: male

Why are the left protecting Pedophiles.
Nov 21^st, 2025 at 12:11pm

2025 and still they are just getting around to investigating.
The police said that such investigations were difficult as they did not want to be seen as islamophobic.

Source Wikipedia, John Smith says it is a right wing neo Nazi website Roll Eyes

From the late 1980s until 2013, group-based child sexual exploitation affected an estimated 1,400 girls, commonly from care home backgrounds, in the town of Rotherham, South Yorkshire, England. Between 1997 and 2013, girls were abused by grooming gangs of predominantly Pakistani men.[10][11][12] Researcher Angie Heal, who was hired by local officials and warned them about child exploitation occurring between 2002 and 2007, has since described it as the "biggest child protection scandal in UK history".[13] In July 2025 investigations were being carried out into allegations that police officers had also raped child victims.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 114466 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Why are the left protecting Pedophiles. Reply #1 - Nov 21^st, 2025 at 12:22pm Here's the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78083 Gender:	Re: Why is Aquascoot such a moron?. Reply #2 - Nov 21^st, 2025 at 12:23pm Horseboy reeks of desperation
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 54231
Gender: male

Re: Why are the left protecting Pedophiles.
Reply #3 - Nov 21^st, 2025 at 12:31pm

Why?

Because the Musos are against the same thing the Left is against and even more vehemently. They hide this common interest and goal behind weasel words and double-think and double-speak like islamophobia, wacism, diversity is our strength, all people and cultures and customs are equally good and anyone who says otherwise is wacist and islamophobic and white supremacist and ..... ZZZZzzzzz.....

on and on and on, relentlessly, without ever pausing to reflect.

"Can't judge Muslim child rapists coz we don't share their kultcha, innit. And they wouldn't listen to us infidel dogs anyway, so what's the point of aggrevating them with out Eurocentric criticism? And it was only a 'tiny minority' that raped a quater of a million white girls over 20 years'. The vast majory simply didn't know nuffin' about nuffin'.Tsk, tsk Roll Eyes

" Bbbwiyawn Ross, saying out loud the idiocy of the Muslim/Left Axis of evil.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

kU6mdn74 New Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 41	Re: Why are the left protecting Pedophiles. Reply #4 - Nov 21^st, 2025 at 12:33pm Crow will not peck out another crow's eye.
Back to top	IP Logged

aquascoot Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 37016 Gender:	Re: Why are the left protecting Pedophiles. Reply #5 - Nov 21^st, 2025 at 12:41pm One of the worst stories uncovered was a 14 yo who escaped and sought refuge at a police station. The police handed her over to a Pakistani man who claimed to be her foster carer and who took her straight back to the slave house
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 147541
Gender: male

Re: Why are the right protecting Pedophiles?
Reply #6 - Nov 21^st, 2025 at 2:18pm

7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,
sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional
distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the
Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties
were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant
Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and
was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other
sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a).

10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties.
On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiffto a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the
course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but
with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in
the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B.

11. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were
she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump,
Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 54231
Gender: male

Re: Why are the left protecting Pedophiles.
Reply #7 - Nov 21^st, 2025 at 3:57pm

Frank wrote on Nov 21^st, 2025 at 12:31pm:

Why?

Because the Musos are against the same thing the Left is against and even more vehemently. They hide this common interest and goal behind weasel words and double-think and double-speak like islamophobia, wacism, diversity is our strength, all people and cultures and customs are equally good and anyone who says otherwise is wacist and islamophobic and white supremacist and ..... ZZZZzzzzz.....

on and on and on, relentlessly, without ever pausing to reflect.

"Can't judge Muslim child rapists coz we don't share their kultcha, innit. And they wouldn't listen to us infidel dogs anyway, so what's the point of aggrevating them with out Eurocentric criticism? And it was only a 'tiny minority' that raped a quater of a million white girls over 20 years'. The vast majory simply didn't know nuffin' about nuffin'.Tsk, tsk Roll Eyes

" Bbbwiyawn Ross, saying out loud the idiocy of the Muslim/Left Axis of evil.

Narrated `Aisha:

that the Prophet (ﷺ) married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).
https://quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/DarusSalam/Hadith-5133

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 37016
Gender: male

Re: Why are the right protecting Pedophiles?
Reply #8 - Nov 21^st, 2025 at 4:10pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2025 at 2:18pm:

7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,
sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional
distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the
Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties
were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant
Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and
was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other
sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a).

10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties.
On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiffto a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the
course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but
with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in
the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B.

11. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were
she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump,
Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B.

Sounds awful.

Was he found guilty

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 53870 Gender:	Re: Why are the left protecting Pedophiles. Reply #9 - Nov 21^st, 2025 at 4:14pm Trump is in the Oval office, not gaol. Enough proof and said there. Gwoggy pumps lies.
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 147541
Gender: male

Re: Why are the right protecting Pedophiles?
Reply #10 - Nov 21^st, 2025 at 6:27pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 21^st, 2025 at 4:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2025 at 2:18pm:

7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,
sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional
distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the
Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties
were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant
Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and
was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other
sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a).

10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties.
On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiffto a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the
course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but
with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in
the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B.

11. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were
she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump,
Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B.

Sounds awful.

Was he found guilty

Never made it to court - there were threats made to the plaintiff stating that she and her family would be physically harmed if not killed if she proceeded with the case.

Coincidentally:

11. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were
she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump,
Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 53870 Gender:	Re: Why are the left protecting Pedophiles. Reply #11 - Nov 21^st, 2025 at 6:35pm Is Gwoggy blinking a lot when he posts?
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 37016
Gender: male

Re: Why are the right protecting Pedophiles?
Reply #12 - Nov 21^st, 2025 at 6:38pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2025 at 6:27pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 21^st, 2025 at 4:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2025 at 2:18pm:

7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,
sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional
distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the
Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties
were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant
Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and
was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other
sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a).

10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties.
On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiffto a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the
course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but
with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in
the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B.

11. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were
she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump,
Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B.

Sounds awful.

Was he found guilty

Never made it to court - there were threats made to the plaintiff stating that she and her family would be physically harmed if not killed if she proceeded with the case.

Coincidentally:

11. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were
she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump,
Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B

Threats that they might kill her family.
Sounds awful
What was the outcome of that court case

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 147541
Gender: male

Re: Why are the right protecting Pedophiles?
Reply #13 - Nov 21^st, 2025 at 6:41pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 21^st, 2025 at 6:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2025 at 6:27pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 21^st, 2025 at 4:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2025 at 2:18pm:

7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,
sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional
distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the
Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties
were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant
Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and
was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other
sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a).

10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties.
On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiffto a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the
course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but
with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in
the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B.

11. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were
she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump,
Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B.

Sounds awful.

Was he found guilty

Never made it to court - there were threats made to the plaintiff stating that she and her family would be physically harmed if not killed if she proceeded with the case.

Coincidentally:

11. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were
she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump,
Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B

Threats that they might kill her family.
Sounds awful
What was the outcome of that court case

Never made it to court - there were threats made to the plaintiff stating that she and her family would be physically harmed if not killed if she proceeded with the case.

Coincidentally:

11. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were
she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump,
Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 54231
Gender: male

Re: Why are lying lefty mongs protecting Pedophiles?
Reply #14 - Nov 21^st, 2025 at 7:11pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2025 at 6:41pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 21^st, 2025 at 6:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2025 at 6:27pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 21^st, 2025 at 4:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2025 at 2:18pm:

7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,
sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional
distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the
Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties
were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant
Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and
was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other
sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a).

10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties.
On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiffto a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the
course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but
with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in
the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B.

11. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were
she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump,
Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B.

Sounds awful.

Was he found guilty

Never made it to court - there were threats made to the plaintiff stating that she and her family would be physically harmed if not killed if she proceeded with the case.

Coincidentally:

11. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were
she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump,
Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B

Threats that they might kill her family.
Sounds awful
What was the outcome of that court case

Never made it to court - there were threats made to the plaintiff stating that she and her family would be physically harmed if not killed if she proceeded with the case.

Coincidentally:

11. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were
she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump,
Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B

Stupid ijit.

You have been 'revealing " it for years now, lying, deranged, slanderous creep an' nuffin' happened.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged