Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Trump doing Putins' bidding (Read 130 times)
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 27837
Gender: male
Trump doing Putins' bidding
Today at 5:04am
 
I doubt we'll ever see Ukraine agree to this ridiculous peace plan drafted by the Trump administration that would see Ukraine give up land to Russia and reduce its military size and equipment in order to appease Russia, the aggressor. Nor should they. Trump is just doing with his buddy Putin asks. Shameful.

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/11/20/politics/ukraine-russia-trump-peace-proposal
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SerialBrain9
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3355
Re: Trump doing Putins' bidding
Reply #1 - Today at 5:50am
 
Russia is not the aggressor - NATO and the west is and has been for the last 4 decades breaking agreements to keep NATO bases out of the east - they’ve been encircling Russia for years and years and now the bear has finally came out to fight - to protect itself
Back to top
 

From a Place You Will Not See, Comes a Sound You Will Not Hear. .  ▄︻デ╦═一━
………..
 
IP Logged
 
SerialBrain9
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3355
Re: Trump doing Putins' bidding
Reply #2 - Today at 5:52am
 
.
Back to top
 

From a Place You Will Not See, Comes a Sound You Will Not Hear. .  ▄︻デ╦═一━
………..
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 114355
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Trump doing Putins' bidding
Reply #3 - Today at 6:07am
 

Ukraine won't accept those terms -

US promises meant nothing before after the Budapest memorandum in 1994.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 27837
Gender: male
Re: Trump doing Putins' bidding
Reply #4 - Today at 6:39am
 
SerialBrain9 wrote Today at 5:50am:
Russia is not the aggressor - NATO and the west is and has been for the last 4 decades breaking agreements to keep NATO bases out of the east - they’ve been encircling Russia for years and years and now the bear has finally came out to fight - to protect itself


You’re an idiot. You realise NATO is a purely defensive organisation, right? That’s unlike Russia, which has a history of aggression against neighbours.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 27837
Gender: male
Re: Trump doing Putins' bidding
Reply #5 - Today at 6:39am
 
Bobby. wrote Today at 6:07am:
Ukraine won't accept those terms -

US promises meant nothing before after the Budapest memorandum in 1994.


US promises mean NOTHING with Trump as President.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 114355
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Trump doing Putins' bidding
Reply #6 - Today at 6:47am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote Today at 6:39am:
Bobby. wrote Today at 6:07am:
Ukraine won't accept those terms -

US promises meant nothing before after the Budapest memorandum in 1994.


US promises mean NOTHING with Trump as President.



History.

Google AI




The Budapest Memorandum was not converted into U.S. law and is considered a political agreement rather than a legally binding treaty. The U.S. and other signatories gave security assurances and pledged to consult in the event of a violation, but the agreement was deliberately structured to avoid a legally enforceable military commitment. The memorandum is best understood as a political document that provides security assurances, and its commitments were not incorporated into U.S. statute.


Political vs. Legal: The Budapest Memorandum was designed to be a political, not a legally binding, agreement. U.S. negotiators specifically used the term "assurances" instead of "guarantees" to emphasize its political nature.


No U.S. legislation: The commitments were not enacted into U.S. law. They were instead political pledges made through a memorandum.


Consultation, not military intervention: The memorandum included an obligation to consult if commitments were violated, but not a direct obligation to intervene militarily. The U.S. and the UK insisted on keeping their commitments political in nature.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78039
Gender: male
Re: Trump doing Putins' bidding
Reply #7 - Today at 7:30am
 
Bobby. wrote Today at 6:47am:
The Budapest Memorandum was not converted into U.S. law


so you agree with Armchair that US promises mean NOTHING?
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51150
Gender: male
Re: Trump doing Putins' bidding
Reply #8 - Today at 7:33am
 
Yup, can’t rely on the US anymore. Well, not until and if a rational administratration is ever elected again.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 114355
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Trump doing Putins' bidding
Reply #9 - Today at 7:34am
 
John Smith wrote Today at 7:30am:
Bobby. wrote Today at 6:47am:
The Budapest Memorandum was not converted into U.S. law


so you agree with Armchair that US promises mean NOTHING?



Yes - the USA is just a bag of wind - they always were after Roosevelt died.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 99556
Re: Trump doing Putins' bidding
Reply #10 - Today at 7:51am
 
Bobby. wrote Today at 6:47am:
Armchair_Politician wrote Today at 6:39am:
Bobby. wrote Today at 6:07am:
Ukraine won't accept those terms -

US promises meant nothing before after the Budapest memorandum in 1994.


US promises mean NOTHING with Trump as President.



History.

Google AI




The Budapest Memorandum was not converted into U.S. law and is considered a political agreement rather than a legally binding treaty. The U.S. and other signatories gave security assurances and pledged to consult in the event of a violation, but the agreement was deliberately structured to avoid a legally enforceable military commitment. The memorandum is best understood as a political document that provides security assurances, and its commitments were not incorporated into U.S. statute.


Political vs. Legal: The Budapest Memorandum was designed to be a political, not a legally binding, agreement. U.S. negotiators specifically used the term "assurances" instead of "guarantees" to emphasize its political nature.


No U.S. legislation: The commitments were not enacted into U.S. law. They were instead political pledges made through a memorandum.


Consultation, not military intervention: The memorandum included an obligation to consult if commitments were violated, but not a direct obligation to intervene militarily. The U.S. and the UK insisted on keeping their commitments political in nature.


Your source?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 99556
Re: Trump doing Putins' bidding
Reply #11 - Today at 8:00am
 
John Smith wrote Today at 7:30am:
Bobby. wrote Today at 6:47am:
The Budapest Memorandum was not converted into U.S. law


so you agree with Armchair that US promises mean NOTHING?


No. Sleepy Joe met with Johnson, Macron and, of course, Zalensky. He upheld his part of the memorandum absolutely. He often referenced it.

Having said that, the Budapest memorandum was more a commitment not to invade Ukraine and respect its borders. From that angle, DL's collusion with Vlad to seize Ukrainian land is indeed a broken promise.

DL, like Biden, is responsible for past US deals in his role of prez.

We all know what he thinks of deals, eh?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5963
Gender: male
Re: Trump doing Putins' bidding
Reply #12 - Today at 8:23am
 
I find it rather amusing that Russia, for decades the enemy of the west, is now being hailed as the good guy because Trump has said so. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 27837
Gender: male
Re: Trump doing Putins' bidding
Reply #13 - Today at 8:26am
 
John Smith wrote Today at 7:30am:
Bobby. wrote Today at 6:47am:
The Budapest Memorandum was not converted into U.S. law


so you agree with Armchair that US promises mean NOTHING?


If it were any other President, it wouldn't be an issue. If it were Clinton or Bush or Obama in the White House then they wouldn't hesitate. But now we have Trump and it's no secret how he admires Putin and other dictators and autocrats. That's why he has come up with a plan to have Ukraine cede sovereign territory to Russia, which Zelensky has already said is a non-starter. Could you imagine the US ceding Diego Garcia to China? Or Alaska to Russia? Why does Trump think Zelensky should give up his land when it was Putin who invaded Ukraine?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 147421
Gender: male
Re: Trump doing Putins' bidding
Reply #14 - Today at 9:39am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote Today at 8:26am:
John Smith wrote Today at 7:30am:
Bobby. wrote Today at 6:47am:
The Budapest Memorandum was not converted into U.S. law


so you agree with Armchair that US promises mean NOTHING?


If it were any other President, it wouldn't be an issue. If it were Clinton or Bush or Obama in the White House then they wouldn't hesitate. But now we have Trump and it's no secret how he admires Putin and other dictators and autocrats. That's why he has come up with a plan to have Ukraine cede sovereign territory to Russia, which Zelensky has already said is a non-starter. Could you imagine the US ceding Diego Garcia to China? Or Alaska to Russia? Why does Trump think Zelensky should give up his land when it was Putin who invaded Ukraine?


He'll do anything Putin wants.

He doesn't want to lose his Russian financial backers.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print