Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 
Send Topic Print
Epstein’s Plane Was Even Sicker Than We Thought (Read 1843 times)
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 53919
Gender: male
Re: Epstein’s Plane Was Even Sicker Than We Thought
Reply #180 - Nov 24th, 2025 at 1:34pm
 
Yawn
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 37020
Gender: male
Re: Epstein’s Plane Was Even Sicker Than We Thought
Reply #181 - Nov 24th, 2025 at 1:50pm
 
Jasin wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 1:34pm:
Yawn





Twilight zone  Smiley Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 45189
Re: Epstein’s Plane Was Even Sicker Than We Thought
Reply #182 - Nov 24th, 2025 at 1:58pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 1:27pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 12:22pm:
aquascoot wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 12:07pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 11:57am:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 23rd, 2025 at 2:06pm:
aquascoot wrote on Nov 23rd, 2025 at 11:53am:
Twilight zone


Aqua proves he is a bullshit artist. He refuses to answer a simple question.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I'll accept your white flag if you want to admit you have no idea if Ian Maxwell worked for Mossad or not.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


9 children and bwian can only account for one
Maths is not his strongsuit


Run, run, Aqua you can't hide though.  None of the Maxwells, apart from Daddy, worked for Mossad, as far as I can tell. Your just bullshitting.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Yawn


Bullshit artist, extraorinair.  You know, you used to be readable, just for enjoyment.  Now your just bullshitting, trying to run away back under your bridge.  To scared to answer a simple question.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 37020
Gender: male
Re: Epstein’s Plane Was Even Sicker Than We Thought
Reply #183 - Nov 24th, 2025 at 2:21pm
 
Twilight zone
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 54267
Gender: male
Re: Epstein’s Plane Was Even Sicker Than We Thought
Reply #184 - Nov 24th, 2025 at 3:04pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 1:58pm:
aquascoot wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 1:27pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 12:22pm:
aquascoot wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 12:07pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 11:57am:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 23rd, 2025 at 2:06pm:
aquascoot wrote on Nov 23rd, 2025 at 11:53am:
Twilight zone


Aqua proves he is a bullshit artist. He refuses to answer a simple question.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I'll accept your white flag if you want to admit you have no idea if Ian Maxwell worked for Mossad or not.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


9 children and bwian can only account for one
Maths is not his strongsuit


Run, run, Aqua you can't hide though.  None of the Maxwells, apart from Daddy, worked for Mossad, as far as I can tell. Your just bullshitting.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Yawn


Bullshit artist, extraorinair.  You know, you used to be readable, just for enjoyment.  Now your just bullshitting, trying to run away back under your bridge.  To scared to answer a simple question.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes




Cheesy
Aqua will probably answer your question, laughable trolling idiot, when fd answers yours.




Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 99626
Re: Epstein’s Plane Was Even Sicker Than We Thought
Reply #185 - Nov 24th, 2025 at 4:17pm
 
Frank wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 3:04pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 1:58pm:
aquascoot wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 1:27pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 12:22pm:
aquascoot wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 12:07pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 11:57am:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 23rd, 2025 at 2:06pm:
aquascoot wrote on Nov 23rd, 2025 at 11:53am:
Twilight zone


Aqua proves he is a bullshit artist. He refuses to answer a simple question.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I'll accept your white flag if you want to admit you have no idea if Ian Maxwell worked for Mossad or not.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


9 children and bwian can only account for one
Maths is not his strongsuit


Run, run, Aqua you can't hide though.  None of the Maxwells, apart from Daddy, worked for Mossad, as far as I can tell. Your just bullshitting.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Yawn


Bullshit artist, extraorinair.  You know, you used to be readable, just for enjoyment.  Now your just bullshitting, trying to run away back under your bridge.  To scared to answer a simple question.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes




Cheesy
Aqua will probably answer your question, laughable trolling idiot, when fd answers yours.






Oh, Aquascoot's already answered just fine, old boy. As have you, JaSin and poor old Leroy.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 54267
Gender: male
Re: Epstein’s Plane Was Even Sicker Than We Thought
Reply #186 - Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:09pm
 
Karnal wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 4:17pm:
Frank wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 3:04pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 1:58pm:
aquascoot wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 1:27pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 12:22pm:
aquascoot wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 12:07pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 11:57am:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 23rd, 2025 at 2:06pm:
aquascoot wrote on Nov 23rd, 2025 at 11:53am:
Twilight zone


Aqua proves he is a bullshit artist. He refuses to answer a simple question.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I'll accept your white flag if you want to admit you have no idea if Ian Maxwell worked for Mossad or not.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


9 children and bwian can only account for one
Maths is not his strongsuit


Run, run, Aqua you can't hide though.  None of the Maxwells, apart from Daddy, worked for Mossad, as far as I can tell. Your just bullshitting.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Yawn


Bullshit artist, extraorinair.  You know, you used to be readable, just for enjoyment.  Now your just bullshitting, trying to run away back under your bridge.  To scared to answer a simple question.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes




Cheesy
Aqua will probably answer your question, laughable trolling idiot, when fd answers yours.






Oh, Aquascoot's already answered just fine, old boy. As have you, JaSin and poor old Leroy.

Oh, you have surmised, paki trouser sniffer, have you? Was it for 10 rupees or in your own idle time?
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19963
Gender: male
Re: Epstein’s Plane Was Even Sicker Than We Thought
Reply #187 - Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:26pm
 
scope wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 12:38am:
Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 23rd, 2025 at 3:35pm:
scope wrote on Nov 22nd, 2025 at 10:53pm:
There is no evidence Trump went to Epsteins Island Politifact a left leaning fact checker confirms this.
You ignore these fact checkers because of your TDS.

Airports keep light records it isn't irrelevant they need it for tax they get charged for landing and parking the plane there along with fuel invoices.
There is no record of Trumps planes going to Virgin islands.

The only record of Trump flying to Virgin Islands was on Presidential Plane Air Force One media were with him.

Once upon a time Trump was friends with Epstein then they fell out in 2004.
Marla posted a video where they talk about email where Epstein is 75% sure it was Trump who dobbed him in.

Virginia Guiffre said Trump never did anything wrong she never saw him at Epstein Island and Trump stopped being friends with Epstein in 2004.

Carroll testified that Trump forcibly pinned her against a wall, pulled down her tights, and inserted his fingers into her vagina, why would you need DNA for that? His lawyers refused citing chain-of-custody issues with the dress.

[b]Tara Reade directly accused Joe Biden of the same specific act (non-consensual digital penetration) that the jury found Donald Trump



I wonder why you always cherry pick details
It does you no favours by omitting details that are so easily verified.

" Carroll recounted how Trump allegedly shoved her against the wall despite her struggles and eventually inserted his fingers and then his penis inside her." Oh gear baron, caught out again Grin
A federal civil jury in New York found Trump liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll by forcibly penetrating her vagina with his fingers, they did not accept he put his penis in her.

It was a civil case, not criminal  There is no “guilty” or “not guilty” verdict in U.S. civil trials.

The jury decides liability (did he do it or not) by a “preponderance of the evidence” standard — basically “more likely than not.” 

If liability is found, they award money damages.  No jail, no criminal record







Trump left DNA evidence on her dress, thats why he fought for 3 years to not have that evidence presented in court.
There is no evidence Trumps DNA was on her dress which she claims happened 27 years earlier and wore that dress only once after


I dont know about you, but if I were accused of rape and I claimed " I dont know that women, never met her" as trump did.
I would gladly supply my DNA to prove I was innocent.
But trump didnt, he fought tooth and nail to have that evidence excluded from court, yea an innocent man would do just that. Grin
Civil courts aren't dealing with guilty not guilty or innocent they determine liability for $$$$. There is no criminal record or jail from civil court in US


As to flight logs, you are still excluding the possibility that trump and epstein used other aircraft, its been shown that epstein flew on trumps planes many times.
Given how close they were in the 90's anything is possible with those 2 lowlifes, but keep defending trump all you want,hopefully the truth will come out one day
More clutching at straws get help for your TDS.
People buy planes so they don't have to fly on other peoples planes


In lower Manhattan where jury was selected for that trial 9% of voters are registered republicans.

The case is under appeal it hasn't been resolved



Oh look baron shifting the goal posts when caught out lying, why am I not surprised  Grin
Never once did I claim it was a criminal trial, so you are trying a diversion tactic, it didnt work.

There was DNA evidence, it was tested and revealed DNA  of an unknown man, it was at that point trump started fighting to a: not give a DNA sample and b: not have the DNA evidence allowed to be presented in court, so baron is still lying by claiming there was no DNA evidence, you really need to try harder, your barefaced lies in trying to protect trump are childish at best, so easily disproven. Grin
To help you with your English comprehension problem, I will include this.

Innocent can be used in numerous ways as an adjective, as a noun, it doesnt always mean a person is not guilty of a crime.
Maybe try reading a thesaurus once in a while.


Trumps legal team were right to mention chain of custody issues with that dress

She claimed the dress was hanging in her wardrobe for 26 years worn only once after that day Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in Manhattan in was it 1995 or 1996 does she even remember?

It seems absurd she claims to have resisted yet nobody not even the dressing room attendants heard anything.
You expect us to believe Trump followed her into a dressing room while she was shopping for womens clothes?

There is no record of any criminal complaint filed by Carroll against Trump  in 1995-1996 or at any point afterward.

The case isn't resolved it's going to a higher court




Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 147585
Gender: male
Re: Epstein’s Plane Was Even Sicker Than We Thought
Reply #188 - Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:32pm
 

The usual suspects defending sexual predators   Roll Eyes

Sickening.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
scope
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1503
Gender: male
Re: Epstein’s Plane Was Even Sicker Than We Thought
Reply #189 - Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:42pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:26pm:
scope wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 12:38am:
Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 23rd, 2025 at 3:35pm:
scope wrote on Nov 22nd, 2025 at 10:53pm:
There is no evidence Trump went to Epsteins Island Politifact a left leaning fact checker confirms this.
You ignore these fact checkers because of your TDS.

Airports keep light records it isn't irrelevant they need it for tax they get charged for landing and parking the plane there along with fuel invoices.
There is no record of Trumps planes going to Virgin islands.

The only record of Trump flying to Virgin Islands was on Presidential Plane Air Force One media were with him.

Once upon a time Trump was friends with Epstein then they fell out in 2004.
Marla posted a video where they talk about email where Epstein is 75% sure it was Trump who dobbed him in.

Virginia Guiffre said Trump never did anything wrong she never saw him at Epstein Island and Trump stopped being friends with Epstein in 2004.

Carroll testified that Trump forcibly pinned her against a wall, pulled down her tights, and inserted his fingers into her vagina, why would you need DNA for that? His lawyers refused citing chain-of-custody issues with the dress.

[b]Tara Reade directly accused Joe Biden of the same specific act (non-consensual digital penetration) that the jury found Donald Trump



I wonder why you always cherry pick details
It does you no favours by omitting details that are so easily verified.

" Carroll recounted how Trump allegedly shoved her against the wall despite her struggles and eventually inserted his fingers and then his penis inside her." Oh gear baron, caught out again Grin
A federal civil jury in New York found Trump liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll by forcibly penetrating her vagina with his fingers, they did not accept he put his penis in her.

It was a civil case, not criminal  There is no “guilty” or “not guilty” verdict in U.S. civil trials.

The jury decides liability (did he do it or not) by a “preponderance of the evidence” standard — basically “more likely than not.” 

If liability is found, they award money damages.  No jail, no criminal record







Trump left DNA evidence on her dress, thats why he fought for 3 years to not have that evidence presented in court.
There is no evidence Trumps DNA was on her dress which she claims happened 27 years earlier and wore that dress only once after


I dont know about you, but if I were accused of rape and I claimed " I dont know that women, never met her" as trump did.
I would gladly supply my DNA to prove I was innocent.
But trump didnt, he fought tooth and nail to have that evidence excluded from court, yea an innocent man would do just that. Grin
Civil courts aren't dealing with guilty not guilty or innocent they determine liability for $$$$. There is no criminal record or jail from civil court in US


As to flight logs, you are still excluding the possibility that trump and epstein used other aircraft, its been shown that epstein flew on trumps planes many times.
Given how close they were in the 90's anything is possible with those 2 lowlifes, but keep defending trump all you want,hopefully the truth will come out one day
More clutching at straws get help for your TDS.
People buy planes so they don't have to fly on other peoples planes


In lower Manhattan where jury was selected for that trial 9% of voters are registered republicans.

The case is under appeal it hasn't been resolved



Oh look baron shifting the goal posts when caught out lying, why am I not surprised  Grin
Never once did I claim it was a criminal trial, so you are trying a diversion tactic, it didnt work.

There was DNA evidence, it was tested and revealed DNA  of an unknown man, it was at that point trump started fighting to a: not give a DNA sample and b: not have the DNA evidence allowed to be presented in court, so baron is still lying by claiming there was no DNA evidence, you really need to try harder, your barefaced lies in trying to protect trump are childish at best, so easily disproven. Grin
To help you with your English comprehension problem, I will include this.

Innocent can be used in numerous ways as an adjective, as a noun, it doesnt always mean a person is not guilty of a crime.
Maybe try reading a thesaurus once in a while.


Trumps legal team were right to mention chain of custody issues with that dress

She claimed the dress was hanging in her wardrobe for 26 years worn only once after that day Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in Manhattan in was it 1995 or 1996 does she even remember?

It seems absurd she claims to have resisted yet nobody not even the dressing room attendants heard anything.
You expect us to believe Trump followed her into a dressing room while she was shopping for womens clothes?

There is no record of any criminal complaint filed by Carroll against Trump  in 1995-1996 or at any point afterward.

The case isn't resolved it's going to a higher court






Trump could have easily made the whole incident go away at the same time as proving EJean Carrol a liar and saving himself $80 million, just a simple cheek swab was all it would have taken.
After all trump claimed he didnt know her and he was innocent of the accusation.
But he didnt.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19963
Gender: male
Re: Epstein’s Plane Was Even Sicker Than We Thought
Reply #190 - Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:48pm
 
scope wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:42pm:
Trump could have easily made the whole incident go away at the same time as proving EJean Carrol a liar and saving himself $80 million, just a simple cheek swab was all it would have taken.
After all trump claimed he didnt know didnt know her and he was innocent of the accusation.


The jury didn't buy her story he stuck his penis in her so DNA would have made no difference.

They still would have found him $$$$Liable for sticking fingers in the jury pool selection area only had 9% registered republicans lots of people with TDS.

It's going to a higher court where it's unlikely they will have people with TDS ruling on it.



Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 147585
Gender: male
Re: Epstein’s Plane Was Even Sicker Than We Thought
Reply #191 - Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:58pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:48pm:
scope wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:42pm:
Trump could have easily made the whole incident go away at the same time as proving EJean Carrol a liar and saving himself $80 million, just a simple cheek swab was all it would have taken.
After all trump claimed he didnt know didnt know her and he was innocent of the accusation.


The jury didn't buy her story he stuck his penis in her so DNA would have made no difference.



I'm not sure you know how DNA matching works   Undecided

Do you honestly think DNA traces can only be left by a penis and not fingers?

Tell me you're not serious.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 54267
Gender: male
Re: Epstein’s Plane Was Even Sicker Than We Thought
Reply #192 - Nov 24th, 2025 at 6:03pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:58pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:48pm:
scope wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:42pm:
Trump could have easily made the whole incident go away at the same time as proving EJean Carrol a liar and saving himself $80 million, just a simple cheek swab was all it would have taken.
After all trump claimed he didnt know didnt know her and he was innocent of the accusation.


The jury didn't buy her story he stuck his penis in her so DNA would have made no difference.



I'm not sure you know how DNA matching works   Undecided

Do you honestly think DNA traces can only be left by a penis and not fingers?

Tell me you're not serious.

So there was no DNA evidence of any kind.

No evidence of any kind, just her word, 20 years later.

What did YOU do on the afternoon of 6 October 2006? Did you stick your tongue in?
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 147585
Gender: male
Re: Epstein’s Plane Was Even Sicker Than We Thought
Reply #193 - Nov 24th, 2025 at 6:05pm
 
Frank wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 6:03pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:58pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:48pm:
scope wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:42pm:
Trump could have easily made the whole incident go away at the same time as proving EJean Carrol a liar and saving himself $80 million, just a simple cheek swab was all it would have taken.
After all trump claimed he didnt know didnt know her and he was innocent of the accusation.


The jury didn't buy her story he stuck his penis in her so DNA would have made no difference.



I'm not sure you know how DNA matching works   Undecided

Do you honestly think DNA traces can only be left by a penis and not fingers?

Tell me you're not serious.

So there was no DNA evidence of any kind.


Incorrect.

Analysis of DNA on her dress concluded it did contain traces of an unknown man’s DNA.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19963
Gender: male
Re: Epstein’s Plane Was Even Sicker Than We Thought
Reply #194 - Nov 24th, 2025 at 6:11pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:58pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:48pm:
scope wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:42pm:
Trump could have easily made the whole incident go away at the same time as proving EJean Carrol a liar and saving himself $80 million, just a simple cheek swab was all it would have taken.
After all trump claimed he didnt know didnt know her and he was innocent of the accusation.


The jury didn't buy her story he stuck his penis in her so DNA would have made no difference.



I'm not sure you know how DNA matching works   Undecided

Do you honestly think DNA traces can only be left by a penis and not fingers?

Tell me you're not serious.


DNA would have been thrown out in criminal court over chain of custody issues.

She never reported this to police the dress wasn't tested until 26 years after the event which is a serious chain of custody issue.
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 
Send Topic Print