Jasin wrote on Nov 19
th, 2025 at 5:43pm:
......As for Communism? It's only failure is that it is compromised by Northern Hemisphere politics in general, where anything like a RePUBLIC as well, fails to empower the people as a whole (the mass) - only empowering the individuals at the top.
Australian Egalitarianism is much like what Communism originally aimed for.
But politics in the southern hemisphere succeeds for 'the people' more so than for the individuals.
So for Communism in China? You know - the thing that the USSR forced upon them to adopt or else.
Well it's the best it can do considering it's true cultural destiny is not to be a political nation of people at all.
It would be more justified to blame politics itself for what has happened in China.
Now.
Is Hong Kong really that bad now?
Bobby. wrote on Nov 19
th, 2025 at 5:56pm:
As for Communism? It's only failure is that it is compromised by Northern Hemisphere politics in general?
Wow JaSin - you are awfully close to being on the cultural Marxist list.
WWW search....
reasons why 'true' socialism always fails
Google.......AI Overview Quote:
Arguments for why socialism fails often cite issues with incentive structures, economic planning, and political and social consequences.
Critics contend that a lack of personal profit and reward removes the incentive to work hard, while centralized control and bureaucracy lead to inefficiency, shortages, and a disconnect between planners and the public.
Furthermore, many historical examples have been linked to political repression and a decline in living standards.
Economic criticisms
Lack of incentives: When rewards for hard work and success are removed, critics argue that there is less motivation for individuals and businesses to be productive or innovative.
Inefficient central planning: Government planners, unable to process vast amounts of information, may be unable to set prices and allocate resources efficiently, leading to shortages and surpluses.
Absence of profit and loss: A system without a profit-and-loss mechanism can't effectively measure or reward economic performance, making it difficult to identify and correct inefficiencies.
Distorted price signals: Without market-driven prices, the economy loses a critical tool for transmitting information about scarcity and demand, which hinders rational decision-making.
Political and social criticisms
Bureaucracy and inefficiency: Centralized control can lead to a large, inefficient bureaucracy that is slow to respond to the needs of the public.
Suppression of individual rights: Critics point to historical cases where socialist governments have used oppressive tactics, such as imprisonment and violence, to suppress dissent.
Erosion of living standards: Some historical socialist experiments have resulted in a decline in productivity and a lower standard of living for the population compared to market-based economies.
"Not-real-socialism" defense: A recurring argument is that when socialist systems fail, proponents often claim it wasn't "real" socialism, which they argue is a way to avoid accountability for past failures, according to The Cornell Review and Forbes.
Also, there is no integrity [tolerance.....of truth] in the socialist model.
Socialist models, are driven by a 'collective' aspiration for egalitarianism.
Socialism......its i great idea.......but lacking any tolerance of [a requisite] constructive criticism.......and a spirit of integrity.