freediver wrote on Dec 1
st, 2025 at 11:24am:
TGDWell, if a state which is part of a nation...
But it isn't, little pink.
It was during the Qing dynasty, reclaimed in 1945 after Japan's defeat, and reaffirmed in 1971 at the UN (res 2758).
Until you admit those facts, your posts will continue to be GIGO, based as they are on your delusional 'individual freedom' ideology.
Quote:And finding the word "China" in a UN resolution is not a licence to build whatever fantasy you want.....
Too funny, coming from a delusional 'individual freedom' fantasist like yourself who is in the habit of ignoring UN resolutions
Quote:TGDYour error: NZ was never part of Oz.
So what? Are you agreeing with me that Taiwan was once part of China, but isn't now?
No;
your ideology-caused confusion is again exposed: you equated (incorrectly)
"saying the Australian government is the only legitimate government of Australia, therefore it is also the government of New Zealand with me (correctly) saying the Chinese government is the only legitimate government of China INCLUDING Taiwan which IS part of China, as noted above.
ie "It was (recognized) during the Qing dynasty, reclaimed in 1945 after Japan's defeat, and reaffirmed in 1971 at the UN (res 2758)."
Quote:I ignored it because it is not relevant. Taiwan is a democracy. Australia is a democracy. France is a democracy. Even though none of them have been a democracy since the beginning of time. Only a complete moron would insist that we add that caveat every time we talk about democratic nations.
Ok, it's a democracy.
And in Hong Kong:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_in_Hong_Kong#:~:text=In%202023%2C%20Hong...On 20 December 2021, China's central government issued a white paper on its view of democracy in Hong Kong, which it framed as an executive-led governance arrangement designed to ensure Hong Kong's capacity and efficacy***.[89]: 186 According to this view, there is no single set of criteria for democracy and no single democratic model that is universally acceptable*** and ability to deal with seccessionist 'individual freedom' fools from within, and external forces who want to overthrow China's legal government.
As for democracy, just ask Trump, who continually ignores the constitution in the US, or Netanyahu who wants to overrule the supreme court in Israel...
Quote:You have already explained the CCP double speak about "peaceful" -
Not double-speak: Xi is even tolerating the US arming Taiwan - who is the aggressor?
Quote:That is both false, and not an answer to the question asked:
You seem to think the island's per capita income will keep increasing as it has in the past - even while the US is stealing the productive capacity of the TSMC which is Taiwan's chief source of income - and that the mainland will never reach parity.
Quote:Why did you claim you were not talking about Taiwan after I pointed out that the CCP had barely changed the relative income between China and Taiwan over the last decade?
Already answered.