|
Frank
|
Karnal wrote Yesterday at 5:54pm: Frank wrote Yesterday at 5:36pm: Karnal wrote Yesterday at 3:42pm: Frank wrote Yesterday at 2:55pm: Karnal wrote Yesterday at 2:38pm: Frank wrote Yesterday at 11:55am: Karnal wrote Yesterday at 11:48am: Frank wrote Yesterday at 9:37am: Karnal wrote on Nov 10 th, 2025 at 10:11pm: using the law for partisan purposes, targeting his adversaries while sparing his friends and donors from investigation, prosecution, and possible punishment. Bazza Hussein (  ) O'Bama's playbook throughout his three terms. Learned it in Chicago, applied it in D.C., insh'allah. Insh'allah, is it? How multicultural of you, dear boy, but I'm curious. Are you now saying using the law for partisan purposes, targeting adversaries while sparing friends and donors from investigation, prosecution, and possible punishment is all good, Insh'allah? A simple yes or no will suffice. I am saying that it was started and perfected by a Muslim mulatto guy from Kenya who had 3 terms as prez, insh'allah. Is mulatto Muslim from Kenya 'multicultural' enough? A simple yes or no will suffice. I see. So you're saying that using the law for partisan purposes, targeting adversaries while sparing friends and donors from investigation, prosecution, and possible punishment is all good. Thanks for the clarification, but I'm still curious. How does this square with your feelings about the rule of law? We'll await your reply before we conclude with a response. Since when does " it was started and perfected by Mulatto Muslim from Kenya over his 3 terms" means "it's all good," grimacing, lying trouser sniffer? Why, since you spinelessly evaded the question about your very own DL using the law for partisan purposes, targeting adversaries while sparing friends and donors from investigation, prosecution, and possible punishment, you naughty old thing. We now have you openly supporting it. I put it to you that you never supported the rule of law at all. All you were ever about is using the law for partisan purposes, targeting adversaries while sparing friends and donors from investigation, prosecution, and possible punishment. I can't see how one could come to any other conclusion. Hardly the type we want polluting our jolly board. Perhaps Sprint would like to withdraw his invitation. You are trying to be cute, stupid old tapdancing trouser sniffer, but you only manage, as always, to be grotesque. While the Muselman Mulatto from Kenya was doing it for his 3 terms you, your gimps gweggy, comode politician, sprint, sad Meanjjnian (  ) and the rest, were clapping along, chanting that 'nobody is above the law'. Now you are all grimacing and blathering about partisan purposes. You are all as sly and dishonest and ultimately stupid as the BBC, ABC, Granuiad, CNN, Al Jizz-ya, university politics and sociology departments. And here you go again, gwimacing, blathering and spinelessly trying to cover your evasion with more and more words. So now we know. After all these years, it was all a lie. The phoney civilisation, the fake democracy, the ridiculous rule of, the lib… You never could get your tongue around that one, but we’ve got you now. All you ever stood for is partisan purposes, targeting adversaries while sparing friends and donors from investigation, prosecution, and possible punishment. Cheers, big ears. The Musel village forum awaits your return. Arse covering blustering will not save you, arse sniffing blustered. What IS the difference between the Muslim Mulatto's 'nobody is above the law' for three terms and now? If it was wrong then, why did you and your gimps clap along for 12 years? Because you'll are as dishonest, as bent and hypocritical as each other and the Mulatto Muselman.
|
Forum
Pages: 1 
