Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 6
th, 2025 at 5:23pm:
Maybe not hiding—essential data was gathered—but saving face?
We have the swab evidence
We have the genotypes of the viruses studied at the lab. Covid19 was not one of the viruses. The spike was present in early form, needing 10,000 generations to develop fully. That could have happened in wild animals that were then captured and sold at the wet market.
There is no swab evidence ya dopey dim wit.
The WHO is still critical of China for not allowing further investigation today we should not forget China tried to blame this on frozen meat from Australia.
The so called swab evidence failed peer review.
Quote:We can at least agree that the virus was present in the Wuhan market. Samples collected from market stalls and drains in early January 2020 contain SARS-CoV-2 genetic material. A recent analysis of this material, published in the journal Cell, claimed to show that the common ancestor of the viruses at the market was the common ancestor of the whole pandemic.
That sounds compelling, until you realise that all of these samples were collected weeks after the pandemic began andnone came from a live animal.
Unaccountably, no samples were collected before the market was closed and the animals destroyed.
Primarily for this reason, most commentators – including me – consider these latest results suggestive but not definitive.
The lack of samples from animals is a problem. No one believes that this virus originated in Wuhan.
So it must have been brought into the market from somewhere. Yet no SARS-CoV-2 has been found along the supply chains for the animals sold there.
Could a person rather than an animal have brought SARS-CoV-2 into the market in late 2019? That’s entirely possible. Many of the viruses near the base of the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral tree came from people with no links to the market.
Despite the many uncertainties and unanswered questions, it would be much easier to accept the market hypothesis if the pandemic had begun in one of the hundreds (or possibly thousands – no one seems to know for sure) of other Chinese cities that had similar markets in 2020. (It just happened in the market down the road from Wuhan lab
)
Yet the epicentre of the COVID pandemic was less than 20 kilometres from China’s pre-eminent coronavirus research lab, the Wuhan Institute of Virology. That is an extraordinary coincidence, and you’d need compelling evidence that the market was the source (or that the lab wasn’t) to dismiss it.
Dismissed as a conspiracy theory
Yet as far back as March 2020, on a bare minimum of evidence, the idea that a lab was involved in any way was already being dismissed as a conspiracy theory.
https://theconversation.com/did-covid-come-from-an-animal-market-heres-what-the-... China bulldozed the wet market destroyed it early january never let anyone in to examine origins and still deny access to data of covid origins.
It's a big problem having no live or dead animals with covid and relying on swabs taken after market was cleared out.
Mong is a dumb khunt
Forum
Pages: 
Fauci probe perjury gain of function research (Read 1479 times)
