Australian Politics Forum - Comey Indicted

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146373
Gender: male

Re: Comey Indicted
Reply #90 - Sep 30^th, 2025 at 8:51am

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 30^th, 2025 at 7:04am:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 29^th, 2025 at 12:49pm:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 28^th, 2025 at 7:17pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 28^th, 2025 at 3:21pm:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 28^th, 2025 at 11:01am:

The legal fees should bankrupt comey.

Donald has constructed a win win.

Who cares about the outcome.

The public service now understand their duty to the superior man

You're assuming it will get that far. It's going to need a very loyal to Trump over their oath of office and to the law Judge to get up off the ground.

Why would you say that.
Comey lied that there was Russian collusion
There wasn't
I hope he likes orange

Actually this is not correct. It was found that there was Russian collusion they just never connected Trump personally with that collusion. Though Trumps people refusing to testify clearly impacted the ability to gain evidence. A number of them were prosecuted mainly for lying to the FBI.

Exactly.

Even if that's what the indictment was about, it doesn't actually change a thing.

The diehard loyalist running the department, who couldn't find a single subordinate willing to torch their career and bar membership to file these charges because the case is paper-thin, is an insurance lawyer, not even a prosecutor. And yet this amateur is expected to carry the whole thing through?

It's just another case of "merit" in Trump world meaning blind obedience, not actual skill or qualification. And this is the person the entire case rests on.

Good luck with that.

And she wants to white wash slavery from America's history.

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/27/politics/video/lindsey-halligan-us-attorney-c...

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 53038
Gender: male

Re: Comey Indicted
Reply #91 - Sep 30^th, 2025 at 3:03pm

WASHINGTON, D.C. — According to several statements to the press, Democrats are outraged by the unprecedented political prosecutions of people not named Donald Trump.

The latest statements of outrage came after the Department of Justice announced criminal charges against Former FBI Director James Comey, who is not named Donald Trump. Several other politicians and bureaucrats, also not named Donald Trump, have also been referred for criminal charges for crimes they may have committed and Democrats say that is a big problem.

"The Department of Justice has been hijacked," said U.S. Representative Monica McIver, who has been charged with forcibly impeding a federal officer at an immigration detention facility. "This is the unprecedented weaponization of the Department of Justice against the President's own political enemies, diverting the department from its true mission which is to go after our political enemy named Donald Trump."

"Democracy dies when the Department of Justice can prosecute Democrats for crimes," warned U.S. Senator Adam Schiff, who is being investigated under suspicion of committing mortgage fraud. "Our name literally means we believe in Democracy. The President is weaponizing the Justice system to attack Democracy!"

At publishing time, Democrats had also unequivocally condemned political assassinations of all people not named Charlie Kirk.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 98973

Re: Comey Indicted
Reply #92 - Sep 30^th, 2025 at 4:02pm

I say, old boy, did you know? The US attorney given the Comey case said no go. We can't get a conviction on this, he said. We're stuck even finding a crime.

So the big fella told Pam to fire him. He then gave her a replacement - some old insurance lawyer who worked on his bank fraud case, Lindsey Halligan.

This is a senior government position, you understand. They require things called skills. Lindsey has none. She's never prosecuted a case, never even argued a case in a court.

Pam obeyed her DL's orders, swore Lindsey in as a US attorney, and told her to get Comey.

Lindsey typed up a quick affidavit and asked her colleagues: anybody in?

One by one, they read her affidavit and shook their heads. You're out of your mind, they said. No way.

So, Lindsey grit her teeth and filed the indictment. DL texted her a thumbs-up. Lindsey blushed.

Literally everybody says the case is doomed. No crime, no evidence, no case. And do you know?

All Comey has to do in his defence is hand over DL's own posts. Believe it or not, lawfare's illegal in the US. Prosecutors have very limited guidelines in which to press charges, as you'd expect. First, they need evidence of a crime. Second, they need to be able to present the facts before a court.

Rule of law, all that.

Only in America, eh?

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 30^th, 2025 at 4:15pm by Karnal »

IP Logged

aquascoot Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 36744 Gender:	Re: Comey Indicted Reply #93 - Sep 30^th, 2025 at 4:38pm Since when do senior government positions require skills?
Back to top	IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 19426 Gender:	Re: Comey Indicted Reply #94 - Sep 30^th, 2025 at 6:27pm Karnal wrote on Sep 30^th, 2025 at 4:02pm: Believe it or not, lawfare's illegal in the US. And yet climate lawfare is not. Go figure.
Back to top	IP Logged

Leroy

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3758
Gender: male

Re: Comey Indicted
Reply #95 - Sep 30^th, 2025 at 6:54pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 30^th, 2025 at 4:02pm:

I say, old boy, did you know? The US attorney given the Comey case said no go. We can't get a conviction on this, he said. We're stuck even finding a crime.

So the big fella told Pam to fire him. He then gave her a replacement - some old insurance lawyer who worked on his bank fraud case, Lindsey Halligan.

This is a senior government position, you understand. They require things called skills. Lindsey has none. She's never prosecuted a case, never even argued a case in a court.

Pam obeyed her DL's orders, swore Lindsey in as a US attorney, and told her to get Comey.

Lindsey typed up a quick affidavit and asked her colleagues: anybody in?

One by one, they read her affidavit and shook their heads. You're out of your mind, they said. No way.

So, Lindsey grit her teeth and filed the indictment. DL texted her a thumbs-up. Lindsey blushed.

Literally everybody says the case is doomed. No crime, no evidence, no case. And do you know?

All Comey has to do in his defence is hand over DL's own posts. Believe it or not, lawfare's illegal in the US. Prosecutors have very limited guidelines in which to press charges, as you'd expect. First, they need evidence of a crime. Second, they need to be able to present the facts before a court.

Rule of law, all that.

Only in America, eh?

Do you mean like a paid for dossier from UK M16 agent Steele. Grin

Back to top

Trump derangement syndrome
Fareed Zakaria defined the term as "hatred of President Trump so intense that it impairs people's judgment"

Lets check in at 5pm on 23rd July 2025 then at 5pm on 30th July

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146373
Gender: male

Re: Comey Indicted
Reply #96 - Sep 30^th, 2025 at 7:31pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 30^th, 2025 at 4:02pm:

I say, old boy, did you know? The US attorney given the Comey case said no go. We can't get a conviction on this, he said. We're stuck even finding a crime.

So the big fella told Pam to fire him. He then gave her a replacement - some old insurance lawyer who worked on his bank fraud case, Lindsey Halligan.

This is a senior government position, you understand. They require things called skills. Lindsey has none. She's never prosecuted a case, never even argued a case in a court.

Pam obeyed her DL's orders, swore Lindsey in as a US attorney, and told her to get Comey.

Lindsey typed up a quick affidavit and asked her colleagues: anybody in?

One by one, they read her affidavit and shook their heads. You're out of your mind, they said. No way.

So, Lindsey grit her teeth and filed the indictment. DL texted her a thumbs-up. Lindsey blushed.

Literally everybody says the case is doomed. No crime, no evidence, no case. And do you know?

All Comey has to do in his defence is hand over DL's own posts. Believe it or not, lawfare's illegal in the US. Prosecutors have very limited guidelines in which to press charges, as you'd expect. First, they need evidence of a crime. Second, they need to be able to present the facts before a court.

Rule of law, all that.

Only in America, eh?

Excellent post.

It's all true.

Halligan has destroyed her legal career.

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 60356
Here
Gender: male

Re: Comey Indicted
Reply #97 - Sep 30^th, 2025 at 9:46pm

Leroy wrote on Sep 30^th, 2025 at 6:54pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 30^th, 2025 at 4:02pm:

I say, old boy, did you know? The US attorney given the Comey case said no go. We can't get a conviction on this, he said. We're stuck even finding a crime.

So the big fella told Pam to fire him. He then gave her a replacement - some old insurance lawyer who worked on his bank fraud case, Lindsey Halligan.

This is a senior government position, you understand. They require things called skills. Lindsey has none. She's never prosecuted a case, never even argued a case in a court.

Pam obeyed her DL's orders, swore Lindsey in as a US attorney, and told her to get Comey.

Lindsey typed up a quick affidavit and asked her colleagues: anybody in?

One by one, they read her affidavit and shook their heads. You're out of your mind, they said. No way.

So, Lindsey grit her teeth and filed the indictment. DL texted her a thumbs-up. Lindsey blushed.

Literally everybody says the case is doomed. No crime, no evidence, no case. And do you know?

All Comey has to do in his defence is hand over DL's own posts. Believe it or not, lawfare's illegal in the US. Prosecutors have very limited guidelines in which to press charges, as you'd expect. First, they need evidence of a crime. Second, they need to be able to present the facts before a court.

Rule of law, all that.

Only in America, eh?

Do you mean like a paid for dossier from UK M16 agent Steele. Grin

Intelligence briefs are almost never 100% correct. Much of the steele dossier was correct but a lot was also not correct.

Former US president Donald Trump has been ordered to pay a six-figure legal bill to a company founded by a former British spy whom Trump unsuccessfully sued for making what his lawyer called “shocking and scandalous” false claims that harmed his reputation.

Quote:

Trump ordered to pay $382,000 after losing UK lawsuit over Steele dossier

A London judge, who threw out the case against Orbis Business Intelligence last month saying it was “bound to fail”, ordered Trump to pay legal fees of £300,000 ($382,000), according to court documents released on Thursday.

a man in a blue suit and striped tie looks ahead
Trump-backed former congressional candidate arrested for murder
Read more
Orbis was founded by Christopher Steele, who once ran the Russia desk for Britain’s Secret Intelligence Service, also known as MI6.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 53038 Gender:	Re: Comey Indicted Reply #98 - Sep 30^th, 2025 at 9:52pm As always with lawfare, the process IS the punishment.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Dnarever Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 60356 Here Gender:	Re: Comey Indicted Reply #99 - Sep 30^th, 2025 at 11:36pm Frank wrote on Sep 30^th, 2025 at 9:52pm: As always with lawfare, the process IS the punishment. At least you know that this is Lawfare - there is no justifiable basis for it. Just the whim of a crazy orange maniac.
Back to top	IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36744
Gender: male

Re: Comey Indicted
Reply #100 - Oct 1^st, 2025 at 5:31am

Dnarever wrote on Sep 29^th, 2025 at 10:23pm:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 29^th, 2025 at 6:53pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 29^th, 2025 at 6:51pm:

U.S. — Democrats sounded the alarm over Trump's prosecution of former FBI Director James Comey, warning that the prosecution of political opponents could set a dangerous precedent for America's democracy.

"We're entering uncharted waters here," said Senator Corey Booker while waving his arms wildly and popping his eyes out to demonstrate how dangerous and uncharted the waters were. "If Trump can maliciously prosecute James Comey, where does it end? Just imagine what could happen! We've never seen anything like this!"

Democrats and other experts claimed that if Trump opens this door, it could lead to malicious and frivolous "lawfare" that could end in political appointees arrested and prosecuted for obscure technicalities before being marched in front of cameras to have their mugshots taken. "Just imagine if that happened in America," said Booker. "I shudder to think."

Democrats were also promising that when they get back in power, they will retaliate by prosecuting Republicans. Republicans responded that if Democrats prosecute Republicans, they will retaliate by prosecuting Democrats when Republicans take power again. Democrats then responded by saying that if they prosecute Republicans, and Republicans retaliate by prosecuting Democrats, they will then retaliate back by once again prosecuting Republicans.

At publishing time, Republicans had responded by promising to retaliate again by prosecuting Democrats.

Yep, the left started it.
Talk about having egg on your face.

Letitia James is next in line.

Donny has a duty to show them the error of their ways

Quote:

Talk about having egg on your face.

Has there ever been a time when Trump didn't have egg on his face ?

Possibly the nights of the 2016 and 2024 elections ?

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 36744 Gender:	Re: Comey Indicted Reply #101 - Oct 1^st, 2025 at 5:32am Dnarever wrote on Sep 30^th, 2025 at 11:36pm: Frank wrote on Sep 30^th, 2025 at 9:52pm: As always with lawfare, the process IS the punishment. At least you know that this is Lawfare - there is no justifiable basis for it. Just the whim of a crazy orange maniac. When did Biden have orange hair ?
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146373
Gender: male

Re: Comey Indicted
Reply #102 - Oct 6^th, 2025 at 3:31pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30^th, 2025 at 7:31pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 30^th, 2025 at 4:02pm:

I say, old boy, did you know? The US attorney given the Comey case said no go. We can't get a conviction on this, he said. We're stuck even finding a crime.

So the big fella told Pam to fire him. He then gave her a replacement - some old insurance lawyer who worked on his bank fraud case, Lindsey Halligan.

This is a senior government position, you understand. They require things called skills. Lindsey has none. She's never prosecuted a case, never even argued a case in a court.

Pam obeyed her DL's orders, swore Lindsey in as a US attorney, and told her to get Comey.

Lindsey typed up a quick affidavit and asked her colleagues: anybody in?

One by one, they read her affidavit and shook their heads. You're out of your mind, they said. No way.

So, Lindsey grit her teeth and filed the indictment. DL texted her a thumbs-up. Lindsey blushed.

Literally everybody says the case is doomed. No crime, no evidence, no case. And do you know?

All Comey has to do in his defence is hand over DL's own posts. Believe it or not, lawfare's illegal in the US. Prosecutors have very limited guidelines in which to press charges, as you'd expect. First, they need evidence of a crime. Second, they need to be able to present the facts before a court.

Rule of law, all that.

Only in America, eh?

Excellent post.

It's all true.

Halligan has destroyed her legal career.

Clueless Barbie is as dumb as a bag of hammers.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 53038
Gender: male

Re: Comey Indicted
Reply #103 - Oct 7^th, 2025 at 3:04am

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 6^th, 2025 at 3:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30^th, 2025 at 7:31pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 30^th, 2025 at 4:02pm:

I say, old boy, did you know? The US attorney given the Comey case said no go. We can't get a conviction on this, he said. We're stuck even finding a crime.

So the big fella told Pam to fire him. He then gave her a replacement - some old insurance lawyer who worked on his bank fraud case, Lindsey Halligan.

This is a senior government position, you understand. They require things called skills. Lindsey has none. She's never prosecuted a case, never even argued a case in a court.

Pam obeyed her DL's orders, swore Lindsey in as a US attorney, and told her to get Comey.

Lindsey typed up a quick affidavit and asked her colleagues: anybody in?

One by one, they read her affidavit and shook their heads. You're out of your mind, they said. No way.

So, Lindsey grit her teeth and filed the indictment. DL texted her a thumbs-up. Lindsey blushed.

Literally everybody says the case is doomed. No crime, no evidence, no case. And do you know?

All Comey has to do in his defence is hand over DL's own posts. Believe it or not, lawfare's illegal in the US. Prosecutors have very limited guidelines in which to press charges, as you'd expect. First, they need evidence of a crime. Second, they need to be able to present the facts before a court.

Rule of law, all that.

Only in America, eh?

Excellent post.

It's all true.

Halligan has destroyed her legal career.

Clueless Barbie is as dumb as a bag of hammers.

David Pakman is a ****wit after creepy gweggy's own heart. He is as malicious, he edits videos ad thdm talks shite about his handywork.
Creepy, stupid, TDS.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146373
Gender: male

Re: Comey Indicted
Reply #104 - Oct 7^th, 2025 at 7:22pm

Frank wrote on Oct 7^th, 2025 at 3:04am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 6^th, 2025 at 3:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30^th, 2025 at 7:31pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 30^th, 2025 at 4:02pm:

I say, old boy, did you know? The US attorney given the Comey case said no go. We can't get a conviction on this, he said. We're stuck even finding a crime.

So the big fella told Pam to fire him. He then gave her a replacement - some old insurance lawyer who worked on his bank fraud case, Lindsey Halligan.

This is a senior government position, you understand. They require things called skills. Lindsey has none. She's never prosecuted a case, never even argued a case in a court.

Pam obeyed her DL's orders, swore Lindsey in as a US attorney, and told her to get Comey.

Lindsey typed up a quick affidavit and asked her colleagues: anybody in?

One by one, they read her affidavit and shook their heads. You're out of your mind, they said. No way.

So, Lindsey grit her teeth and filed the indictment. DL texted her a thumbs-up. Lindsey blushed.

Literally everybody says the case is doomed. No crime, no evidence, no case. And do you know?

All Comey has to do in his defence is hand over DL's own posts. Believe it or not, lawfare's illegal in the US. Prosecutors have very limited guidelines in which to press charges, as you'd expect. First, they need evidence of a crime. Second, they need to be able to present the facts before a court.

Rule of law, all that.

Only in America, eh?

Excellent post.

It's all true.

Halligan has destroyed her legal career.

Clueless Barbie is as dumb as a bag of hammers.

David Pakman is a ****wit after creepy gweggy's own heart. He is as malicious, he edits videos ad thdm talks shite about his handywork.
Creepy, stupid, TDS.

He didn't edit out the part where Hair Extension Barbie spewed out a garbled word salad Grin

Back to top

IP Logged