Australian Politics Forum - The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21660 Gordon Gender:	The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Sep 19^th, 2025 at 5:53pm Upload a full and unedited video of Charlie being hateful.
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 149654 Gender:	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #1 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 6:04pm Gordy wants people to spread hate
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21660 Gordon Gender:	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #2 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 6:42pm Nine posted so far.
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 149654 Gender:	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #3 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 6:43pm Love it European Parliament Refuses Moment of Silence for Charlie Kirk
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21748
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #4 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 6:49pm

He's gathered a handful of pre-prepared excuses to trot out whenever you post a video of Kirk saying openly racist things, misrepresenting DEI, and using it as cover to claim Black people are "too stupid" to earn those positions without affirmative action or DEI supposedly lowering standards, claims that are outright false.

DEI does not lower standards, that's just the excuse bigoted white people give when traditional hiring practices no longer grant them automatic advantage because of their race.

They claim to champion "meritocracy," failing to understand that DEI is meritocracy, it simply restores opportunities they're no longer entitled to by default. Their idea of merit is nothing more than regaining the privileges lost when race no longer dictates access.

Gordon thinks he's armed with clever gotchas, ready to step on every rake like a Frank. Yet even if you post an hour-long podcast highlighting the exact moments where Kirk makes these racist statements in full context, he'll fall back on the tired "taken out of context" defence.

He simply does not see them as racist because he agrees with them.

The dance has already been performed to death, we know exactly how it will play out.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21660 Gordon Gender:	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #5 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 7:00pm Videos of Kirk hate speech = 0.
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 100476	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #6 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 7:12pm I'm afraid you're taking him out of context there, Sad. Gordon's not racist. He once went to Delhi. He's fingered a Boong. Some of his best friends are black hommers. Gordon knows the tinted races all too well. If this makes him a little wary, you can hardly blame Gordon. That's on them, no?
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 149654
Gender: male

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #7 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 7:14pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 19^th, 2025 at 6:49pm:

He's gathered a handful of pre-prepared excuses to trot out whenever you post a video of Kirk saying openly racist things, misrepresenting DEI, and using it as cover to claim Black people are "too stupid" to earn those positions without affirmative action or DEI supposedly lowering standards, claims that are outright false.

DEI does not lower standards, that's just the excuse bigoted white people give when traditional hiring practices no longer grant them automatic advantage because of their race.

They claim to champion "meritocracy," failing to understand that DEI is meritocracy, it simply restores opportunities they're no longer entitled to by default. Their idea of merit is nothing more than regaining the privileges lost when race no longer dictates access.

Gordon thinks he's armed with clever gotchas, ready to step on every rake like a Frank. Yet even if you post an hour-long podcast highlighting the exact moments where Kirk makes these racist statements in full context, he'll fall back on the tired "taken out of context" defence.

He simply does not see them as racist because he agrees with them.

The dance has already been performed to death, we know exactly how it will play out.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21660 Gordon Gender:	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #8 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 7:20pm Videos of Kirk hate speech = 0.
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

Armchair_Politician Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 28322 Gender:	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #9 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 9:02pm Charlie Kirk gets owned by a kid way smarter than him... https://youtube.com/shorts/zWvd91So5GI?si=h2BWqdRrp64iU8cv
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 149654
Gender: male

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #10 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 9:59pm

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 19^th, 2025 at 9:02pm:

Charlie Kirk gets owned by a kid way smarter than him...

Well, to be fair, that would be most kids.

Kirk was very articulate - I'll give him that.

However, he wasn't smart or intelligent.

He was quite ignorant, in fact.

And, quite evil.

Having said that, he certainly did not deserve to be murdered by a right-wing, MAGA, Christian gun-nut.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21748
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #11 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 10:08pm

Gordon wrote on Sep 19^th, 2025 at 7:20pm:

Videos of Kirk hate speech = 0.

How about this, why don't I just post a compilation of the things he's actually said, instead of wasting my time hand-holding you through the full clips, transcripts, and context, only for you to parrot the same pre-packaged excuses anyway, and then whinge about "context" or simply defend it outright as if bigotry becomes magically acceptable if you agree with it.

So why don't I just put the compilation up, and you can trot out the exact same tired deflections you were going to post regardless. Then, at least, we can respond to the script you're working from without playing the charade that you're engaging honestly.

Sound like a plan?

Here we go:

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 36342 Gender:	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #12 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 10:35pm
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

Baronvonrort Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20275 Gender:	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #13 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 11:12pm Anyone got videos of Charlie debating someone instead of youtubers posting edited videos? You need the context of the exchange you can't just pick snippets.
Back to top	Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it. IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21748
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #14 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 11:14pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Sep 19^th, 2025 at 11:12pm:

Anyone got videos of Charlie debating someone instead of youtubers posting edited videos?

You need the context of the exchange you can't just pick snippets.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 19^th, 2025 at 10:08pm:

How about this, why don't I just post a compilation of the things he's actually said, instead of wasting my time hand-holding you through the full clips, transcripts, and context, only for you to parrot the same pre-packaged excuses anyway, and then whinge about "context" or simply defend it outright as if bigotry becomes magically acceptable if you agree with it.

So why don't I just put the compilation up, and you can trot out the exact same tired deflections you were going to post regardless. Then, at least, we can respond to the script you're working from without playing the charade that you're engaging honestly.

Sound like a plan?

Back to top

IP Logged