Australian Politics Forum - The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 89707 Proud Old White Australian Man Gender:	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #165 - Oct 4^th, 2025 at 11:11pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 4^th, 2025 at 4:53pm: To what end, what's the point of your post? The purpose of the post? Why - to defeat your position!
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 89707
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #166 - Oct 4^th, 2025 at 11:15pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 4^th, 2025 at 7:49am:

Setanta wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 9:57pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 4:45pm:

And?

The articulation of your point has won me over. Maybe.. What was your point again? Undecided

He posted a Breitbart article without any reference to the source or an opinion given.

What exactly is his point meant to be here?

Is he suggesting the government should dictate what courses Harvard can or can't teach?

Is he trying to undermine the reputation of Harvard itself?

Or is it just another lazy attempt to pass off a copy/paste job as if it's his own insight, when in reality it's nothing more than parroting whatever source has told him what and how to think this week?

Honestly, is it too much to expect actual discussion on a discussion forum?

Or are the far-right extremists on here a heavily protected species now?

Pointed question:- Does Harvard have a reputation these days after its support for Hamas and for chopping up children with chemicals and knives? How could it possibly defend what it always knew to be indefensible?

Well - this is scarcely a scientific study - the free thinking mind would instantly associate such a post with the reason it is posted... if one has to explain it - one is dealing with Philistines who have the sense of humour and intellect of a sand adder .......

Humour is the greatest finger pointer of reality.... and parody is one of the most penetrating aspects of humour... but one must never lose track of the simple truth that parody and hyperbole are not one and the same .....

I would suggest the REAL issue that would require government intervention is the simple set of questions - is this course mandatory? If so, on what basis? What is its purpose? On what basis should any student be compelled to pay for such a course, especially if it is mandatory?

In the 1980's here a mandatory social science component was enforced in degree courses................. how now the rather loose definition of 'social science' these days? The study of minority anti=-social groups is not really social science for the majority - that is a very specialised niche suitable only for discussion at high-flying specialist cosktail parties as some kind of frippery .... but having little to no relevance to society at large......

Back to top

« Last Edit: Oct 4^th, 2025 at 11:23pm by Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM »

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21748
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #167 - Oct 5^th, 2025 at 6:59am

Frank wrote on Oct 4^th, 2025 at 4:56pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 4^th, 2025 at 4:53pm:

To what end, what's the point of your post?

Gawd, you ARE thick and slow. A true 'intellectual'.

Quote:

Speaking of wee sons of Lahore...

So there was no point then.

That makes more sense. Better watch out for those rakes dear.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 56166
Gender: male

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #168 - Oct 5^th, 2025 at 5:21pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 5^th, 2025 at 6:59am:

Frank wrote on Oct 4^th, 2025 at 4:56pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 4^th, 2025 at 4:53pm:

To what end, what's the point of your post?

Gawd, you ARE thick and slow. A true 'intellectual'.

Quote:

Speaking of wee sons of Lahore...

So there was no point then.

That makes more sense. Better watch out for those rakes dear.

Gawd, you ARE thick and slow. A true 'intellectual'.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21748
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #169 - Oct 5^th, 2025 at 5:23pm

Frank wrote on Oct 5^th, 2025 at 5:21pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 5^th, 2025 at 6:59am:

Frank wrote on Oct 4^th, 2025 at 4:56pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 4^th, 2025 at 4:53pm:

To what end, what's the point of your post?

Gawd, you ARE thick and slow. A true 'intellectual'.

Quote:

Speaking of wee sons of Lahore...

So there was no point then.

That makes more sense. Better watch out for those rakes dear.

Gawd, you ARE thick and slow. A true 'intellectual'.

And you're reverting to insults again, I must be over the target.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 56166
Gender: male

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #170 - Oct 5^th, 2025 at 5:27pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 5^th, 2025 at 5:23pm:

Frank wrote on Oct 5^th, 2025 at 5:21pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 5^th, 2025 at 6:59am:

Frank wrote on Oct 4^th, 2025 at 4:56pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 4^th, 2025 at 4:53pm:

To what end, what's the point of your post?

Gawd, you ARE thick and slow. A true 'intellectual'.

Quote:

Speaking of wee sons of Lahore...

So there was no point then.

That makes more sense. Better watch out for those rakes dear.

Gawd, you ARE thick and slow. A true 'intellectual'.

And you're reverting to insults again, I must be over the target.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1758268395/154#154

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 149654
Gender: male

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #171 - Oct 5^th, 2025 at 8:03pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 5^th, 2025 at 5:23pm:

Frank wrote on Oct 5^th, 2025 at 5:21pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 5^th, 2025 at 6:59am:

Frank wrote on Oct 4^th, 2025 at 4:56pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 4^th, 2025 at 4:53pm:

To what end, what's the point of your post?

Gawd, you ARE thick and slow. A true 'intellectual'.

Quote:

Speaking of wee sons of Lahore...

So there was no point then.

That makes more sense. Better watch out for those rakes dear.

Gawd, you ARE thick and slow. A true 'intellectual'.

And you're reverting to insults again, ...

It's literally all he has.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Baronvonrort Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20275 Gender:	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #172 - Oct 5^th, 2025 at 10:30pm .
Back to top	hate_charlie.jpg (103 KB \| 10 ) Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it. IP Logged

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 89707 Proud Old White Australian Man Gender:	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #173 - Oct 5^th, 2025 at 10:52pm More like revering insults - some of you would drive a saint to insult.... you just go on and on...
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21748
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #174 - Oct 6^th, 2025 at 6:55am

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 5^th, 2025 at 10:30pm:

.

Make it make sense?

Most people on the left didn't cheer what Kirk did. Engaging with freshmen college students who aren't studying anything related to politics and "debating" them for content, often spouting made up stats and lies to "prove" your point, isn't something to be proud of. And you can see how bad at actual debate it is, sorry, was, when he went up against people ready to talk to him.

When he went to Cambridge University and got destroyed by those students, for example. And it was telling who he was too afraid to face, be it Dean Withers, Hasan Piker etc.

It's because of this that people criticised him when he was alive.

However, they also condemned what happened to him, the manner in which it occurred, and the secrecy surrounding it. If we ever get the truth about who killed him or how it really happened, I guarantee the same people will be demanding accountability.

It's the same logic with the Palestinians. I don't support their political leadership, not even remotely, but I still condemn the wholesale slaughter of civilians by Israel, be it with their attacks or by their war crimes, starving the population.

So if you're outraged about what happened to Kirk, blaming it on the radical left and political violence, yet you somehow believe Palestinians deserve what is happening to them, explain how that isn't the height of hypocrisy.

Make that make sense.

I don't think you realise, but if you can't share the same concern and outrage over what happened to Kirk, to what is happening to innocent men, women and children in Gaza, you're the one with the problem, and your "all lives matter" bullshit is just that.

Bullshit.

Back to top

IP Logged