Australian Politics Forum - Charlie Kirk’s widow speaks

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 98932

Re: Charlie Kirk’s widow speaks
Reply #90 - Sep 17^th, 2025 at 5:53pm

scope wrote on Sep 17^th, 2025 at 2:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 17^th, 2025 at 1:26pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 17^th, 2025 at 1:16pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 17^th, 2025 at 1:04pm:

They want their civil war.

Yep, reminds me of the 2024 film Civil War.

Can't remember if I've seen that or not.

It gets 7/10 on IMDb

Available on Prime.

And yes, the MAGA morons sure do want their civil war - they just love violence.

Has Kirk's widow been out dog whistling the violent mobs again? Roll Eyes

Nah, shes been busy sending thousands and thousands of begging emails, text messages ,and updating kirks webpage asking for "donations" to help keep kirks legacy alive, apparently shes raked in close to a million or so already, but hey shes just the grieving widow.

Just so, Scope. The cost of a memorial shrine will not come cheap, but there's also the ongoing work of Turning Point USA, its marketing, merchandising and monetisation.

We're talking a national movement here. The big fella's not going to live forever, dear. Every dollar given to Erika takes the fight to the leftards, illegals and shithole countries.

We will make America great again, no?

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 60258 Here Gender:	Re: Charlie Kirk’s widow speaks Reply #91 - Sep 17^th, 2025 at 6:22pm Chuck was with the Calvary Chapel Association. These believe that men lead and women follow. Mrs Kirk's job was to do what she was told. Before this period Kirk was described as secular and a critic of religious influence on politics and the state. Chuck was flexible with what he believed.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 98932

Re: Charlie Kirk’s widow speaks
Reply #92 - Sep 17^th, 2025 at 6:49pm

Dnarever wrote on Sep 17^th, 2025 at 6:22pm:

Chuck was with the Calvary Chapel Association. These believe that men lead and women follow. Mrs Kirk's job was to do what she was told.

Before this period Kirk was described as secular and a critic of religious influence on politics and the state.

Chuck was flexible with what he believed.

Oh, sure. If Jeb Bush had won the 2016 primaries, Chuck would be getting about college campuses in round, Waspy spectacles, tweed jackets and brogues, selling boring American conservatism and family values.

Thanks to the big fella, Chuck got the opportunity to sell fascism.

What a swell party it is, no?

Back to top

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 20890
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Charlie Kirk’s widow speaks
Reply #93 - Sep 18^th, 2025 at 7:44am

As I learn more about her, she's actually quite an impressive woman. Certainly way out of Kirk's league.

Makes you wonder how accurate the rumours are about her being a honeypot to control him and keep him on message.

A message that seemed recently to be faltering a little bit, at least around the Epstein files and Israel.

Back to top

IP Logged

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88653
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male

Re: Charlie Kirk’s widow speaks
Reply #94 - Sep 18^th, 2025 at 8:27am

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 7:44am:

As I learn more about her, she's actually quite an impressive woman. Certainly way out of Kirk's league.

Makes you wonder how accurate the rumours are about her being a honeypot to control him and keep him on message.

A message that seemed recently to be faltering a little bit, at least around the Epstein files and Israel.

You seriously need to re-align your thinking.

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 20890
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Charlie Kirk’s widow speaks
Reply #95 - Sep 18^th, 2025 at 10:16am

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 8:27am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 7:44am:

As I learn more about her, she's actually quite an impressive woman. Certainly way out of Kirk's league.

Makes you wonder how accurate the rumours are about her being a honeypot to control him and keep him on message.

A message that seemed recently to be faltering a little bit, at least around the Epstein files and Israel.

You seriously need to re-align your thinking.

She is an extraordinary woman, highly educated, an accomplished athlete, a Miss USA pageant competitor, and had amassed considerable wealth long before she ever met Kirk.

When they met, he was far from the established figure he is today. TPUSA was growing, but it wasn't until Trump lost to Biden that young conservatives truly turned to him, as he began echoing Trump's messages on a platform that reached them, while Biden dominated the spotlight.

Kirk was undeniably ambitious, a rising star in conservative activism, steadily building his reputation and online presence, but he was nowhere near her league.

It's not uncommon for rising figures to be paired with influential women, often exceptionally impressive women, to enhance their profile and visibility but to also guide them towards the interests of those who made their union possible.

He had also recently moderated his stance on Israel and the Epstein Files, signalling a softer approach: less support for their atrocities and advocating for the files to be released unredacted.

Hate me all you like, Grap, but what in the above is inaccurate?

Would you prefer I think in alternative facts?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 145866
Gender: male

Re: Charlie Kirk’s widow speaks
Reply #96 - Sep 18^th, 2025 at 11:28am

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 10:16am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 8:27am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 7:44am:

As I learn more about her, she's actually quite an impressive woman. Certainly way out of Kirk's league.

Makes you wonder how accurate the rumours are about her being a honeypot to control him and keep him on message.

A message that seemed recently to be faltering a little bit, at least around the Epstein files and Israel.

You seriously need to re-align your thinking.

She is an extraordinary woman, highly educated, an accomplished athlete, a Miss USA pageant competitor, and had amassed considerable wealth long before she ever met Kirk.

When they met, he was far from the established figure he is today. TPUSA was growing, but it wasn't until Trump lost to Biden that young conservatives truly turned to him, as he began echoing Trump's messages on a platform that reached them, while Biden dominated the spotlight.

Kirk was undeniably ambitious, a rising star in conservative activism, steadily building his reputation and online presence, but he was nowhere near her league.

It's not uncommon for rising figures to be paired with influential women, often exceptionally impressive women, to enhance their profile and visibility but to also guide them towards the interests of those who made their union possible.

He had also recently moderated his stance on Israel and the Epstein Files, signalling a softer approach: less support for their atrocities and advocating for the files to be released unredacted.

Hate me all you like, Grap, but what in the above is inaccurate?

Would you prefer I think in alternative facts?

She's still repugnant though.

She fully supports and endorses Donald Trump - a convicted felon and adjudicated rapist.

That makes her every bit as bad as Trump and her dead husband.

I'll never understand why women support and defend rapists.

Back to top

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 20890
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Charlie Kirk’s widow speaks
Reply #97 - Sep 18^th, 2025 at 11:37am

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 11:28am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 10:16am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 8:27am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 7:44am:

As I learn more about her, she's actually quite an impressive woman. Certainly way out of Kirk's league.

Makes you wonder how accurate the rumours are about her being a honeypot to control him and keep him on message.

A message that seemed recently to be faltering a little bit, at least around the Epstein files and Israel.

You seriously need to re-align your thinking.

She is an extraordinary woman, highly educated, an accomplished athlete, a Miss USA pageant competitor, and had amassed considerable wealth long before she ever met Kirk.

When they met, he was far from the established figure he is today. TPUSA was growing, but it wasn't until Trump lost to Biden that young conservatives truly turned to him, as he began echoing Trump's messages on a platform that reached them, while Biden dominated the spotlight.

Kirk was undeniably ambitious, a rising star in conservative activism, steadily building his reputation and online presence, but he was nowhere near her league.

It's not uncommon for rising figures to be paired with influential women, often exceptionally impressive women, to enhance their profile and visibility but to also guide them towards the interests of those who made their union possible.

He had also recently moderated his stance on Israel and the Epstein Files, signalling a softer approach: less support for their atrocities and advocating for the files to be released unredacted.

Hate me all you like, Grap, but what in the above is inaccurate?

Would you prefer I think in alternative facts?

She's still repugnant though.

She fully supports and endorses Donald Trump - a convicted felon and adjudicated rapist.

That makes her every bit as bad as Trump and her dead husband.

I'll never understand why women support and defend rapists.

I only know about her past, not so much about who she is or what she stands for now.

But given where she's aligned, I don't see any reason to doubt what you're saying, it seems plausible.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gnads Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 32013 Gender:	Re: Charlie Kirk’s widow speaks Reply #98 - Sep 18^th, 2025 at 1:29pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 17^th, 2025 at 1:04pm: They want their civil war. Yes the lunatic left obviously do. And if anyone has set such a tone then it's the left.
Back to top	"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 145866
Gender: male

Re: Charlie Kirk’s widow speaks
Reply #99 - Sep 18^th, 2025 at 2:32pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 11:37am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 11:28am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 10:16am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 8:27am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 7:44am:

As I learn more about her, she's actually quite an impressive woman. Certainly way out of Kirk's league.

Makes you wonder how accurate the rumours are about her being a honeypot to control him and keep him on message.

A message that seemed recently to be faltering a little bit, at least around the Epstein files and Israel.

You seriously need to re-align your thinking.

She is an extraordinary woman, highly educated, an accomplished athlete, a Miss USA pageant competitor, and had amassed considerable wealth long before she ever met Kirk.

When they met, he was far from the established figure he is today. TPUSA was growing, but it wasn't until Trump lost to Biden that young conservatives truly turned to him, as he began echoing Trump's messages on a platform that reached them, while Biden dominated the spotlight.

Kirk was undeniably ambitious, a rising star in conservative activism, steadily building his reputation and online presence, but he was nowhere near her league.

It's not uncommon for rising figures to be paired with influential women, often exceptionally impressive women, to enhance their profile and visibility but to also guide them towards the interests of those who made their union possible.

He had also recently moderated his stance on Israel and the Epstein Files, signalling a softer approach: less support for their atrocities and advocating for the files to be released unredacted.

Hate me all you like, Grap, but what in the above is inaccurate?

Would you prefer I think in alternative facts?

She's still repugnant though.

She fully supports and endorses Donald Trump - a convicted felon and adjudicated rapist.

That makes her every bit as bad as Trump and her dead husband.

I'll never understand why women support and defend rapists.

I only know about her past, not so much about who she is or what she stands for now.

But given where she's aligned, I don't see any reason to doubt what you're saying, it seems plausible.

She fully supported a "man" who did everything he possibly could to get a rapist and convicted criminal who stole money from charities into the White House.

Her husband also organised bus transportation for the Jan. 6 insurrectionists, and she stood by his side while he did it.

I don't care what she's done in the past, that makes her an evil POS right now.

Back to top

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 20890
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Charlie Kirk’s widow speaks
Reply #100 - Sep 18^th, 2025 at 2:45pm

Gnads wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 1:29pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 17^th, 2025 at 1:04pm:

They want their civil war.

Yes the lunatic left obviously do.

And if anyone has set such a tone then it's the left.

That's the best you can do?

People on the right were calling for civil war before there was even a suspect in the shooting. Trump came out, again without knowing who the suspect was, blaming the so-called radical left.

Now there are hundreds if not thousands of videos all over social media of Trump supporters openly begging him to give the word so they can start their long-dreamed civil war.

Meanwhile, the left isn't doing anything remotely comparable. Even the claims that the left are celebrating Kirk's death are flimsy at best, and certainly not coming from politicians or mainstream media. But right-wing politicians, media figures and influencers are loudly calling for civil war.

And the best you can offer in response to Kimmel's so-called "cancelling" is that he accurately pointed out how, between the finger-pointing and narrative-spinning to make sure the shooter couldn't possibly be one of their own, MAGA somehow found time to grieve. That's 100% correct.

But he wasn't celebrating Kirk's death, he wasn't calling for civil war. The standards you apply to the left are worlds apart from the ones you allow for your own side.

But what we see from those on the right, not even just random people on the internet, but their personalities:

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 145866 Gender:	Re: Charlie Kirk’s widow speaks Reply #101 - Sep 18^th, 2025 at 3:03pm Gnads worries me lately. He used to be a reasonable person, and you could argue with him in good faith. Not any more The same thing happened to Setanta. It's a shame.
Back to top	IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 52831 Gender:	Re: Charlie Kirk’s widow speaks Reply #102 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 2:27am greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 3:03pm: Gnads worries me lately. He used to be a reasonable person, and you could argue with him in good faith. Not any more The same thing happened to Setanta. It's a shame. You havent posted a single thing in good faith in 15 years, creepy plonker.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Armchair_Politician

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 27491
Gender: male

Re: Charlie Kirk’s widow speaks
Reply #103 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 6:05am

Dnarever wrote on Sep 17^th, 2025 at 6:22pm:

Chuck was with the Calvary Chapel Association. These believe that men lead and women follow. Mrs Kirk's job was to do what she was told.

Before this period Kirk was described as secular and a critic of religious influence on politics and the state.

Chuck was flexible with what he believed.

So was Vance and Rubio and they ended up being among his most vocal champions when he gave them a job after being among his most vocal critics. Very flexible.

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 60258
Here
Gender: male

Re: Charlie Kirk’s widow speaks
Reply #104 - Sep 19^th, 2025 at 3:48pm

Frank wrote on Sep 19^th, 2025 at 2:27am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 18^th, 2025 at 3:03pm:

Gnads worries me lately.

He used to be a reasonable person, and you could argue with him in good faith.

Not any more Undecided

The same thing happened to Setanta.

It's a shame.

You havent posted a single thing in good faith in 15 years, creepy plonker.

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha - Ho Ho Ho - sniffle sniffle - Frank - Ha Ha Ha. Oh Oh stop it hurts.

Back to top

IP Logged