whiteknight wrote on Sep 7
th, 2025 at 4:12pm:
The Australian Greens have called on the Government to follow the science and set 2035 targets at net-zero and stop approving new coal and gas mines, or risk losing our critical opportunity to prevent disastrous global heating.
Ah, they mean the scientific consensus only.
whiteknight wrote on Sep 7
th, 2025 at 4:12pm:
Anything below net zero by 2035 condemns Australia to more than 2 degrees of warming, in breach of the Paris Agreement.
The Paris Agreement has no teeth, it is entirely voluntary. How can there be a breach of a voluntary agreement? You can simply change your mind and then there is no breach.
whiteknight wrote on Sep 7
th, 2025 at 4:12pm:
“With the government planning their 2035 climate targets, it’s vital that they listen to climate scientists, people in regional communities and our Pacific Island neighbours; and not take us backwards on climate."
So tell us which Pacific island has sunk, which has increased in size and which one has reduced in size.
whiteknight wrote on Sep 7
th, 2025 at 4:12pm:
They're life or death events for people in our region and people in regional communities and all Australians who are suffering from natural disasters that are turbo charged by the climate crisis.
Not according to the IPCC. Strange that.
whiteknight wrote on Sep 7
th, 2025 at 4:12pm:
“The government just needs to listen to scientists, listen to bushfire survivors, listen to our Pacific neighbors, the unions and businesses who are all saying the same thing - Australia must settle on strong science based 2035 targets - and that means net zero.
They are ALL saying it? Complete bullshit.
whiteknight wrote on Sep 7
th, 2025 at 4:12pm:
“The first act of Labor after being re-elected was a tick off on Woodside's massive North West shelf gas project out to 2070. That is inconsistent with strong climate action, and just like Pacifica leaders, the bushfire survivors, and scientists, the Greens say we need strong science based targets that tackle climate pollution and keep us all safe.
Nope. They say we need to keep gas for the forseeable future. More lies.
whiteknight wrote on Sep 7
th, 2025 at 4:12pm:
“Australia has done too little for too long - and now science based targets that keep warming below 2 degrees requires a monumental effort of reaching net zero in the next ten years, not by 2050.
It is impossible to get to net zero. Wind and solar are too diverse. Think - What power generation are they going to use so that it becomes net zero rather than absolute zero.
whiteknight wrote on Sep 7
th, 2025 at 4:12pm:
“We can see that states and territories are doing some good work already in this space, and if you put all of their contributions together, that would already see us reduce emissions by 71%
All of their contributions together so far have not achieved reductions of that magnitude.
whiteknight wrote on Sep 7
th, 2025 at 4:12pm:
“It can be done and the economic modelling even shows that if the federal Government invests well and soon, a net zero climate target can even be a driver of economic growth, bringing with it cheaper, cleaner energy, new industries, lifelines for regional communities, more Australian manufacturing - as well as less suffering for Australia and our Pacific neighbours and fewer species sent to extinction.”
Oh noes more poor Pacific Islanders. Of course they COULD be a driver of economic growth, if the renewables actually worked at the time required.