Australian Politics Forum - Epstein/Maxwell and Friends.

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39495
Gender: male

Epstein/Maxwell and Friends.
Aug 28^th, 2025 at 5:32pm

I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell.

My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island.......

Quote:

But did I, like, think these guys were coming for that? I really don't know. If you met Epstein, there is no way that this cast of character, of which it's extraordinary, and

some are in your cabinet,

who you value as your coworkers, and you know, would be with him if he was a creep because they wanted sexual favors.

A man wants sexual favors, he will find that. They didn't have to come to Epstein for it.

Did Blanche immediately follow up and ask who she was referring to as being in the current cabinet. NO. The most obvious question to ask her...but NO ~

HE DOES NOT ASK

.

And then there is the damning...."They didn't have to come to Epstein for it." Fact is, according to her, they DID come to Epstein, on to his Lolita Island and if they were not there for what was in the Epstein

Well, what the hell were CABINET MEMBERS doing there??????????

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 146771 Gender:	Re: Epstein/Maxwell and Friends. Reply #1 - Aug 28^th, 2025 at 8:39pm Release the Trumpstein files.
Back to top	IP Logged

Marla

Gold Member

Offline

Run for me, MAGA bunny.

Posts: 14426
Colorado
Gender: female

Re: Epstein/Maxwell and Friends.
Reply #2 - Aug 29^th, 2025 at 5:15am

Aussie wrote on Aug 28^th, 2025 at 5:32pm:

I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell.

My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island.......

In other words, Blanche's interview wasn't racist, bigoted or pseudo-Christian for you to comprehend.

Back to top

I like takin' Tuinal. It keeps me edgy and mean. I'm a teenage schizoid I'm a teenage dope fiend

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21170
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Epstein/Maxwell and Friends.
Reply #3 - Aug 29^th, 2025 at 9:03am

Marla wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 5:15am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 28^th, 2025 at 5:32pm:

I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell.

My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island.......

In other words, Blanche's interview wasn't racist, bigoted or pseudo-Christian for you to comprehend.

Really? I guess we read different things...

It read to me like Aussie was stunned that the second Maxwell started to touch on the "list" of island visitors, Blanche shut it down to shield Trump from being named, making both her and Trump look cleaner than they are.

That doesn't smack of incompetence, it reeks of deliberate protection.

Back to top

IP Logged

Leroy

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3797
Gender: male

Re: Epstein/Maxwell and Friends.
Reply #4 - Aug 29^th, 2025 at 11:24am

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 9:03am:

Marla wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 5:15am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 28^th, 2025 at 5:32pm:

I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell.

My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island.......

In other words, Blanche's interview wasn't racist, bigoted or pseudo-Christian for you to comprehend.

Really? I guess we read different things...

It read to me like Aussie was stunned that the second Maxwell started to touch on the "list" of island visitors, Blanche shut it down to shield Trump from being named, making both her and Trump look cleaner than they are.

That doesn't smack of incompetence, it reeks of deliberate protection.

Sadroo can you provide all the evidence you have of Trump ever being involved with Epstein, I want to compare that evidence with how that affects anyone in the same situation.

Back to top

Trump derangement syndrome
Fareed Zakaria defined the term as "hatred of President Trump so intense that it impairs people's judgment"

Lets check in at 5pm on 23rd July 2025 then at 5pm on 30th July

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146771
Gender: male

Re: Epstein/Maxwell and Friends.
Reply #5 - Aug 29^th, 2025 at 11:29am

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 9:03am:

Marla wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 5:15am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 28^th, 2025 at 5:32pm:

I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell.

My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island.......

In other words, Blanche's interview wasn't racist, bigoted or pseudo-Christian for you to comprehend.

Really? I guess we read different things...

It read to me like Aussie was stunned that the second Maxwell started to touch on the "list" of island visitors, Blanche shut it down to shield Trump from being named, making both her and Trump look cleaner than they are.

That doesn't smack of incompetence, it reeks of deliberate protection.

Indeed.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------
JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP and
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No.:
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
---------------------------------------------------------------
COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS,
SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL
AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE
IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36829
Gender: male

Re: Epstein/Maxwell and Friends.
Reply #6 - Aug 30^th, 2025 at 6:12am

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 11:29am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 9:03am:

Marla wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 5:15am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 28^th, 2025 at 5:32pm:

I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell.

My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island.......

In other words, Blanche's interview wasn't racist, bigoted or pseudo-Christian for you to comprehend.

Really? I guess we read different things...

It read to me like Aussie was stunned that the second Maxwell started to touch on the "list" of island visitors, Blanche shut it down to shield Trump from being named, making both her and Trump look cleaner than they are.

That doesn't smack of incompetence, it reeks of deliberate protection.

Indeed.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------
JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP and
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No.:
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
---------------------------------------------------------------
COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS,
SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL
AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE
IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION

When was the trial?

I mean Trump was charged with book keeping errors, so surely if this had legs , there would have been a trial.

Oh , there wasn't one?

Must have been vexacious

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 53519
Gender: male

Re: Epstein/Maxwell and Friends.
Reply #7 - Oct 27^th, 2025 at 8:12am

The daughter of former Labor prime minister Paul Keating has revealed details of a dinner she went to with notorious convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

As part of the ongoing investigation by US congress into the so-called Epstein files, Katherine Keating was revealed to have attended a dinner with Epstein, organised by disgraced royal Prince Andrew.

In an email dated February 16, 2011, Epstein asked Andrew to organise a dinner with then 29-year-old socialite Ms Keating, to which the prince responded “will do”.

“Would you ask Katherine Keating if she would like to come for dinner with Woody Allen next week in New York?” the invite read.

More than 14 years on, Ms Keating confirmed she had attended the dinner with Epstein along with a “sizeable chunk of NY society”.

“I did attend a February dinner at Andrew’s invitation – a large social event,” she told the Mail on Sunday. “A sizeable chunk of NY society was there, including Barbara Walters, Charlie Rose and Katie Couric.”

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 99212

Re: Epstein/Maxwell and Friends.
Reply #8 - Oct 27^th, 2025 at 8:29am

Aussie wrote on Aug 28^th, 2025 at 5:32pm:

I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell.

My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island.......

Quote:

But did I, like, think these guys were coming for that? I really don't know. If you met Epstein, there is no way that this cast of character, of which it's extraordinary, and

some are in your cabinet,

who you value as your coworkers, and you know, would be with him if he was a creep because they wanted sexual favors.

A man wants sexual favors, he will find that. They didn't have to come to Epstein for it.

Did Blanche immediately follow up and ask who she was referring to as being in the current cabinet. NO. The most obvious question to ask her...but NO ~

HE DOES NOT ASK

.

And then there is the damning...."They didn't have to come to Epstein for it." Fact is, according to her, they DID come to Epstein, on to his Lolita Island and if they were not there for what was in the Epstein

Well, what the hell were CABINET MEMBERS doing there??????????

But of course. Todd Blanche is DL's personal attorney. He's not the deputy DOJ Director, Aussie, not really.

All of them are there for one reason only. Not even Putin has client/attorney privilege with his underlings, only DL.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 99212

Re: Epstein/Maxwell and Friends.
Reply #9 - Oct 27^th, 2025 at 8:31am

aquascoot wrote on Aug 30^th, 2025 at 6:12am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 11:29am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 9:03am:

Marla wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 5:15am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 28^th, 2025 at 5:32pm:

I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell.

My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island.......

In other words, Blanche's interview wasn't racist, bigoted or pseudo-Christian for you to comprehend.

Really? I guess we read different things...

It read to me like Aussie was stunned that the second Maxwell started to touch on the "list" of island visitors, Blanche shut it down to shield Trump from being named, making both her and Trump look cleaner than they are.

That doesn't smack of incompetence, it reeks of deliberate protection.

Indeed.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------
JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP and
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No.:
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
---------------------------------------------------------------
COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS,
SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL
AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE
IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION

When was the trial?

I mean Trump was charged with book keeping errors, so surely if this had legs , there would have been a trial.

Oh , there wasn't one?

Must have been vexacious

Where are all your pics of the Clinton's on Epstein Airlines?

You seem to have gone rather shy, dear.

Why is that, do you think?

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 99212

Re: Epstein/Maxwell and Friends.
Reply #10 - Oct 27^th, 2025 at 8:33am

Frank wrote on Oct 27^th, 2025 at 8:12am:

The daughter of former Labor prime minister Paul Keating has revealed details of a dinner she went to with notorious convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

As part of the ongoing investigation by US congress into the so-called Epstein files, Katherine Keating was revealed to have attended a dinner with Epstein, organised by disgraced royal Prince Andrew.

In an email dated February 16, 2011, Epstein asked Andrew to organise a dinner with then 29-year-old socialite Ms Keating, to which the prince responded “will do”.

“Would you ask Katherine Keating if she would like to come for dinner with Woody Allen next week in New York?” the invite read.

More than 14 years on, Ms Keating confirmed she had attended the dinner with Epstein along with a “sizeable chunk of NY society”.

“I did attend a February dinner at Andrew’s invitation – a large social event,” she told the Mail on Sunday. “A sizeable chunk of NY society was there, including Barbara Walters, Charlie Rose and Katie Couric.”

Hey, old boy, it is rumoured that the former PM in Guiffre's book is none other than KRudd.

Up for a bit of LAWFARE?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146771
Gender: male

Re: Epstein/Maxwell and Friends.
Reply #11 - Oct 27^th, 2025 at 11:23am

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------
JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP and
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No.:
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
---------------------------------------------------------------
COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS,
SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL
AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE
IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 36829 Gender:	Re: Epstein/Maxwell and Friends. Reply #12 - Oct 27^th, 2025 at 12:48pm Jane doe Bring on charge 35. 0/34....not a good strike rate
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146771
Gender: male

Re: Epstein/Maxwell and Friends.
Reply #13 - Oct 27^th, 2025 at 12:59pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 27^th, 2025 at 11:23am:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------
JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP and
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No.:
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
---------------------------------------------------------------
COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS,
SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL
AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE
IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION

10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties.
On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiff
to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the
course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but
with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in
the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B.

Back to top

IP Logged

Armchair_Politician

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 27672
Gender: male

Re: Epstein/Maxwell and Friends.
Reply #14 - Oct 27^th, 2025 at 1:02pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 28^th, 2025 at 5:32pm:

I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell.

My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island.......

Quote:

But did I, like, think these guys were coming for that? I really don't know. If you met Epstein, there is no way that this cast of character, of which it's extraordinary, and

some are in your cabinet,

who you value as your coworkers, and you know, would be with him if he was a creep because they wanted sexual favors.

A man wants sexual favors, he will find that. They didn't have to come to Epstein for it.

Did Blanche immediately follow up and ask who she was referring to as being in the current cabinet. NO. The most obvious question to ask her...but NO ~

HE DOES NOT ASK

.

And then there is the damning...."They didn't have to come to Epstein for it." Fact is, according to her, they DID come to Epstein, on to his Lolita Island and if they were not there for what was in the Epstein

Well, what the hell were CABINET MEMBERS doing there??????????

Blanche wasn't there to conduct a proper investigation or interview. He was there for one reason and one reason only - to find out how compromised Trump is and to convince Maxwell to keep it to herself. That's why she was moved to a different prison. I reckon Blanche made certain promises to her in exchange for her silence.

Back to top

IP Logged