You morons 'think' that Trump personally manages prisoner releases. You are that stupid.


Prisoners are released by mistakes all the time, in all jurisdictions.
Tasmania:

In the past two years, six prisoners have been accidentally released early from Risdon, prompting Attorney-General Vanessa Goodwin to commission two reviews and an external audit.

A seventh prisoner, a man who struggled with a low IQ, spent four months longer in prison than his sentence mandated.


Sydney:

A man who was wrongly released from Sydney's Long Bay jail called police to let them know where he was after hearing about the search for him on the news.



Britain, under Labour, with a black Justice Secretary:

More than 260 were wrongly released in England and Wales in the year to March, official data shows — more than double the figure the year before.

Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Secretary David Lammy said on X Friday that he was “appalled at the rate of releases in error,” and had ordered “tough new release checks, launched an investigation, and started overhauling archaic prison systems.”



Trump doin' it ALL according to deranged mongs.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 1^st, 2025 at 8:42pm:


Sadly, yes.

That's the best we can expect from Frannie these days.

Frank wrote on Dec 1^st, 2025 at 4:50pm:


Shurely shome mishtake.

mothra wrote Yesterday at 6:45am:


Frank: is that your argument?

aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 11:25am:


If you're busting that out, it's clear sign you're all having a hard time defending Trump's actions, again...

Tired of winning yet?

aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 12:31pm:


I never claimed you were defending him, you waded in to prop up Frank, who is bending over backwards to excuse Trump's actions.

If Trump doesn't even know who he's pardoning, and this isn't the first time it's happened, then he's nothing more than a human auto-pen, a rubber stamp in a suit.

And if the mere use of an auto-pen is supposedly enough to try to invalidate, despite there being no legal mechanism to do so, Biden's pardons and executive orders, then why is it suddenly acceptable for Trump to function as a human auto-pen doing the exact same thing?

It's that question you and so many others are desperate, absolutely desperate, to deflect from, to bury, to dodge at all costs, because facing it means admitting the hypocrisy head on.

Gnads wrote Yesterday at 1:01pm:


While you obsess over women with cocks, I'll point out a short list of reasons why republicans have shown that they see women as second-class to men, if not hate them outright. 

Republicans have a history of:

-Dismissing or trivialising workplace discrimination and the gender pay gap as "made up".
-Mocking women in leadership roles as "unqualified" or "diversity hires".
-Opposing paid parental leave while insisting women should be primary caregivers.
-Treating issues like childcare, reproductive healthcare, or domestic violence as "not real policy areas".
-Systematic votes against the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) renewal.
-Blocking equal-pay legislation such as the Paycheck Fairness Act.
-Opposing laws aimed at workplace protections for pregnant women.
-Restricting access to contraception and sex education despite broad public support.
-Supporting policies that allow doctors or employers to deny women healthcare on "moral" grounds.
-Public figures normalising misogynistic rhetoric ("nasty women", "blood coming out of her wherever").
-Attacks on women journalists, prosecutors, judges, and election workers for simply doing their jobs.
-Elevating influencers who push retrograde ideas like women belonging "in the kitchen" or being "submissive".
-Harassing women online who criticise MAGA politics, often with gendered slurs and threats.
-Full bans on abortion with no exceptions for rape, incest, or non-viable pregnancies.
-Criminalising doctors who provide medically necessary reproductive care.
-Pushing for laws allowing surveillance of women's reproductive choices.
-Attempts to restrict IVF, contraception access, and even emergency care for life-threatening pregnancies.
-Some factions openly advocating for repealing women's right to vote ("household voting" proposals).
-Embracing extremist Christian nationalist movements that argue women should be legally subordinate to men.

There are plenty within the Republican Party and especially MAGA who have issues, even hate women, so my comment was fair.

If you have a problem with it being called out, instead of attacking those speaking the truth, maybe advocate from within, that the MAGA tards you stand shoulder to shoulder with do better?

It's a big ask, I know, because even the Women for Trump even ignore the sexism, just so they can enjoy the racism.

Just wait until it hits them that they're the biggest recipients of DEI policies...

ProudKangaroo wrote Yesterday at 3:37pm:


Yes, but which kind of women, Sad? I believe Gonads was seeking a little clarity, that's all. He must have been brushing up on his gender studies.

He takes the subject of gynacology very seriously indeed, clearly.