Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
“We need violence" (Read 4464 times)
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
“We need violence"
Aug 21st, 2025 at 11:56am
 

“We need violence, I’m sorry, but we need f**king violence.”

Another right-wing extremist showing her true colours.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6121
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #1 - Aug 21st, 2025 at 3:19pm
 
Yet the threats of violence are coming from left wing extremists... Roll Eyes

A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert.
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #2 - Aug 21st, 2025 at 3:29pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Aug 21st, 2025 at 3:19pm:
Yet the threats of violence are coming from left wing extremists... Roll Eyes

A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert.


Incorrect.

I suggest you read the article again, a little more carefully.

Those on the left are trying to prevent the violence which is being threatened by the right-wing extremists.

This is from Bec Freedom - the organiser of the right-wing rally:

“We need violence, I’m sorry, but we need f**king violence.”
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6121
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #3 - Aug 21st, 2025 at 5:47pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 21st, 2025 at 3:29pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 21st, 2025 at 3:19pm:
Yet the threats of violence are coming from left wing extremists... Roll Eyes

A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert.


Incorrect.

I suggest you read the article again, a little more carefully.

Those on the left are trying to prevent the violence which is being threatened by the right-wing extremists.

This is from Bec Freedom - the organiser of the right-wing rally:

“We need violence, I’m sorry, but we need f**king violence.”



Your desperate attempt at spin doctoring ignores the context of both statements. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #4 - Aug 21st, 2025 at 5:54pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Aug 21st, 2025 at 5:47pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 21st, 2025 at 3:29pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 21st, 2025 at 3:19pm:
Yet the threats of violence are coming from left wing extremists... Roll Eyes

A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert.


Incorrect.

I suggest you read the article again, a little more carefully.

Those on the left are trying to prevent the violence which is being threatened by the right-wing extremists.

This is from Bec Freedom - the organiser of the right-wing rally:

“We need violence, I’m sorry, but we need f**king violence.”



Your desperate attempt at spin doctoring ignores the context of both statements. Roll Eyes


This is from Bec Freedom - the organiser of the right-wing rally:

“We need violence, I’m sorry, but we need f**king violence.”
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6121
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #5 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:11pm
 
"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert."
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #6 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:14pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:11pm:
"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert."


Correct.

Raising fears about the violence being called for by the right-wing extremist, Bec Freedom - the organiser of the right-wing rally.

These are her exact words:

“We need violence, I’m sorry, but we need f**king violence.”

Why do you support violence?
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6121
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #7 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:32pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:14pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:11pm:
"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert."


Correct.

Raising fears about the violence being called for by the right-wing extremist, Bec Freedom - the organiser of the right-wing rally.

These are her exact words:

“We need violence, I’m sorry, but we need f**king violence.”

Why do you support violence?


The left wing mob are clearly calling for violence. Why do you support it?
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #8 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:00pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:32pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:14pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:11pm:
"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert."


Correct.

Raising fears about the violence being called for by the right-wing extremist, Bec Freedom - the organiser of the right-wing rally.

These are her exact words:

“We need violence, I’m sorry, but we need f**king violence.”

Why do you support violence?


The left wing mob are clearly calling for violence. Why do you support it?


This is the best I can suggest for you.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21931
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #9 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:16pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:11pm:
"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert."


Why is it always the same breed of people who immediately default to playing the victim?

We're dealing with a pack of right-wing, self-proclaimed white supremacists, openly marching to promote racism. The organiser of their little rally has been exposed in leaked audio flat-out saying "we need violence". Their intent could not be clearer, they want violence.

And you're lining up to defend them?  What?!

Yet somehow, when their opposition says this racist nonsense needs to be stamped out, you twist that into proof the left are the real aggressors calling for violence?

The same left who are literally standing against those calling for violence.

By your logic, when Scott Morrison vowed to "stamp out bullying" of women MPs in his own party, he was actually advocating violence against them too? Is that honestly the argument you want to run with?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6121
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #10 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:53pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:16pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:11pm:
"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert."


Why is it always the same breed of people who immediately default to playing the victim?

We're dealing with a pack of right-wing, self-proclaimed white supremacists, openly marching to promote racism. The organiser of their little rally has been exposed in leaked audio flat-out saying "we need violence". Their intent could not be clearer, they want violence.

And you're lining up to defend them?  What?!

Yet somehow, when their opposition says this racist nonsense needs to be stamped out, you twist that into proof the left are the real aggressors calling for violence?

The same left who are literally standing against those calling for violence.

By your logic, when Scott Morrison vowed to "stamp out bullying" of women MPs in his own party, he was actually advocating violence against them too? Is that honestly the argument you want to run with?


You seem to have had no problem with the racists for Gaza march the other day, displaying terrorist symbols and calling for the death of Israelis and involving known terrorist advocates and terrorist organisation members. Now decent Australians have had enough and want their own march you bitch and moan and scream RACIST!!, totally ignoring the obvious call to violence in the statement by the anti Australian leftists who are proposing their own demonstration designed to conflict with the Australians.    Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21931
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #11 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 3:18pm
 
Goalpost change much?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #12 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 3:20pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:53pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:16pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:11pm:
"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert."


Why is it always the same breed of people who immediately default to playing the victim?

We're dealing with a pack of right-wing, self-proclaimed white supremacists, openly marching to promote racism. The organiser of their little rally has been exposed in leaked audio flat-out saying "we need violence". Their intent could not be clearer, they want violence.

And you're lining up to defend them?  What?!

Yet somehow, when their opposition says this racist nonsense needs to be stamped out, you twist that into proof the left are the real aggressors calling for violence?

The same left who are literally standing against those calling for violence.

By your logic, when Scott Morrison vowed to "stamp out bullying" of women MPs in his own party, he was actually advocating violence against them too? Is that honestly the argument you want to run with?


You seem to have had no problem with the racists for Gaza march the other day, displaying terrorist symbols and calling for the death of Israelis and involving known terrorist advocates and terrorist organisation members. Now decent Australians have had enough and want their own march you bitch and moan and scream RACIST!!, totally ignoring the obvious call to violence in the statement by the anti Australian leftists who are proposing their own demonstration designed to conflict with the Australians.    Roll Eyes


Again, you need to work on your comprehension skills.

The left aren't calling for violence - they're simply giving a warning that it's coming (from the right).

The right-wing organiser is the one quite clearly, in plain English, promoting violence.

These are her exact words:

“We need violence, I’m sorry, but we need f**king violence.”
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36384
Gender: female
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #13 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 3:55pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:53pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:16pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:11pm:
"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert."


Why is it always the same breed of people who immediately default to playing the victim?

We're dealing with a pack of right-wing, self-proclaimed white supremacists, openly marching to promote racism. The organiser of their little rally has been exposed in leaked audio flat-out saying "we need violence". Their intent could not be clearer, they want violence.

And you're lining up to defend them?  What?!

Yet somehow, when their opposition says this racist nonsense needs to be stamped out, you twist that into proof the left are the real aggressors calling for violence?

The same left who are literally standing against those calling for violence.

By your logic, when Scott Morrison vowed to "stamp out bullying" of women MPs in his own party, he was actually advocating violence against them too? Is that honestly the argument you want to run with?


You seem to have had no problem with the racists for Gaza march the other day, displaying terrorist symbols and calling for the death of Israelis and involving known terrorist advocates and terrorist organisation members. Now decent Australians have had enough and want their own march you bitch and moan and scream RACIST!!, totally ignoring the obvious call to violence in the statement by the anti Australian leftists who are proposing their own demonstration designed to conflict with the Australians.    Roll Eyes


The overwhelming majority of those protestors support no terrorist organisations, displayed no such symbols and are the abolute furtherst form racist that a person can be. Sure there were some angrier folk there but that's to be expected at any such event.

For instance, the organiser of the event Greg has brought to our attention by white supremacists you call "decent people" is demanding violence. They are saying we "need" violence.

What do you think of that, Belgarion?
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6121
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #14 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 5:40pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 3:18pm:
Goalpost change much?


Unable to face reality much? Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #15 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 5:43pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 5:40pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 3:18pm:
Goalpost change much?


Unable to face reality much? Roll Eyes


Here's reality.

The right-wing organiser said this:

“We need violence, I’m sorry, but we need f**king violence.”

Why do you like violence so much?
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6121
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #16 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 5:43pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 3:20pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:53pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:16pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:11pm:
"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert."


Why is it always the same breed of people who immediately default to playing the victim?

We're dealing with a pack of right-wing, self-proclaimed white supremacists, openly marching to promote racism. The organiser of their little rally has been exposed in leaked audio flat-out saying "we need violence". Their intent could not be clearer, they want violence.

And you're lining up to defend them?  What?!

Yet somehow, when their opposition says this racist nonsense needs to be stamped out, you twist that into proof the left are the real aggressors calling for violence?

The same left who are literally standing against those calling for violence.

By your logic, when Scott Morrison vowed to "stamp out bullying" of women MPs in his own party, he was actually advocating violence against them too? Is that honestly the argument you want to run with?


You seem to have had no problem with the racists for Gaza march the other day, displaying terrorist symbols and calling for the death of Israelis and involving known terrorist advocates and terrorist organisation members. Now decent Australians have had enough and want their own march you bitch and moan and scream RACIST!!, totally ignoring the obvious call to violence in the statement by the anti Australian leftists who are proposing their own demonstration designed to conflict with the Australians.    Roll Eyes


Again, you need to work on your comprehension skills.

The left aren't calling for violence - they're simply giving a warning that it's coming (from the right).

The right-wing organiser is the one quite clearly, in plain English, promoting violence.

These are her exact words:

“We need violence, I’m sorry, but we need f**king violence.”



"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence"

The left wing is in their own words, clearly promoting violence 



Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6121
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #17 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 5:47pm
 
mothra wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 3:55pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:53pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:16pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:11pm:
"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert."


Why is it always the same breed of people who immediately default to playing the victim?

We're dealing with a pack of right-wing, self-proclaimed white supremacists, openly marching to promote racism. The organiser of their little rally has been exposed in leaked audio flat-out saying "we need violence". Their intent could not be clearer, they want violence.

And you're lining up to defend them?  What?!

Yet somehow, when their opposition says this racist nonsense needs to be stamped out, you twist that into proof the left are the real aggressors calling for violence?

The same left who are literally standing against those calling for violence.

By your logic, when Scott Morrison vowed to "stamp out bullying" of women MPs in his own party, he was actually advocating violence against them too? Is that honestly the argument you want to run with?


You seem to have had no problem with the racists for Gaza march the other day, displaying terrorist symbols and calling for the death of Israelis and involving known terrorist advocates and terrorist organisation members. Now decent Australians have had enough and want their own march you bitch and moan and scream RACIST!!, totally ignoring the obvious call to violence in the statement by the anti Australian leftists who are proposing their own demonstration designed to conflict with the Australians.    Roll Eyes


The overwhelming majority of those protestors support no terrorist organisations, displayed no such symbols and are the abolute furtherst form racist that a person can be. Sure there were some angrier folk there but that's to be expected at any such event.

For instance, the organiser of the event Greg has brought to our attention by white supremacists you call "decent people" is demanding violence. They are saying we "need" violence.

What do you think of that, Belgarion?


I think you are living in a fantasy land. The symbols and chants were there on display for all to see and the background of many of the participants has been all over the news.

As for the woman in the OP, in your own words : "Sure there were some angrier folk there but that's to be expected at any such event."



Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #18 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 5:49pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 5:43pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 3:20pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:53pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:16pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:11pm:
"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert."


Why is it always the same breed of people who immediately default to playing the victim?

We're dealing with a pack of right-wing, self-proclaimed white supremacists, openly marching to promote racism. The organiser of their little rally has been exposed in leaked audio flat-out saying "we need violence". Their intent could not be clearer, they want violence.

And you're lining up to defend them?  What?!

Yet somehow, when their opposition says this racist nonsense needs to be stamped out, you twist that into proof the left are the real aggressors calling for violence?

The same left who are literally standing against those calling for violence.

By your logic, when Scott Morrison vowed to "stamp out bullying" of women MPs in his own party, he was actually advocating violence against them too? Is that honestly the argument you want to run with?


You seem to have had no problem with the racists for Gaza march the other day, displaying terrorist symbols and calling for the death of Israelis and involving known terrorist advocates and terrorist organisation members. Now decent Australians have had enough and want their own march you bitch and moan and scream RACIST!!, totally ignoring the obvious call to violence in the statement by the anti Australian leftists who are proposing their own demonstration designed to conflict with the Australians.    Roll Eyes


Again, you need to work on your comprehension skills.

The left aren't calling for violence - they're simply giving a warning that it's coming (from the right).

The right-wing organiser is the one quite clearly, in plain English, promoting violence.

These are her exact words:

“We need violence, I’m sorry, but we need f**king violence.”



"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence"

The left wing is in their own words, clearly promoting violence 



No.

You have English comprehension issues.

The left aren't promoting violence - they're simply giving a warning that it's coming (from the right).

The right-wing organiser is the one quite clearly, in plain English, promoting violence.

These are her exact words:

“We need violence, I’m sorry, but we need f**king violence.”

Why do you love violence so much?

Are you a violent person yourself?

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36384
Gender: female
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #19 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 5:57pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 5:47pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 3:55pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:53pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:16pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:11pm:
"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert."


Why is it always the same breed of people who immediately default to playing the victim?

We're dealing with a pack of right-wing, self-proclaimed white supremacists, openly marching to promote racism. The organiser of their little rally has been exposed in leaked audio flat-out saying "we need violence". Their intent could not be clearer, they want violence.

And you're lining up to defend them?  What?!

Yet somehow, when their opposition says this racist nonsense needs to be stamped out, you twist that into proof the left are the real aggressors calling for violence?

The same left who are literally standing against those calling for violence.

By your logic, when Scott Morrison vowed to "stamp out bullying" of women MPs in his own party, he was actually advocating violence against them too? Is that honestly the argument you want to run with?


You seem to have had no problem with the racists for Gaza march the other day, displaying terrorist symbols and calling for the death of Israelis and involving known terrorist advocates and terrorist organisation members. Now decent Australians have had enough and want their own march you bitch and moan and scream RACIST!!, totally ignoring the obvious call to violence in the statement by the anti Australian leftists who are proposing their own demonstration designed to conflict with the Australians.    Roll Eyes


The overwhelming majority of those protestors support no terrorist organisations, displayed no such symbols and are the abolute furtherst form racist that a person can be. Sure there were some angrier folk there but that's to be expected at any such event.

For instance, the organiser of the event Greg has brought to our attention by white supremacists you call "decent people" is demanding violence. They are saying we "need" violence.

What do you think of that, Belgarion?


I think you are living in a fantasy land. The symbols and chants were there on display for all to see and the background of many of the participants has been all over the news.

As for the woman in the OP, in your own words : "Sure there were some angrier folk there but that's to be expected at any such event."




Ummm, she's the organiser! I think that's kind of important to the fact.

But are you really arguing that some white supremacists are really decent people? You already said so once but i'm giving you an opportunity to clarify.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #20 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:03pm
 
mothra wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 5:57pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 5:47pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 3:55pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:53pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:16pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:11pm:
"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert."


Why is it always the same breed of people who immediately default to playing the victim?

We're dealing with a pack of right-wing, self-proclaimed white supremacists, openly marching to promote racism. The organiser of their little rally has been exposed in leaked audio flat-out saying "we need violence". Their intent could not be clearer, they want violence.

And you're lining up to defend them?  What?!

Yet somehow, when their opposition says this racist nonsense needs to be stamped out, you twist that into proof the left are the real aggressors calling for violence?

The same left who are literally standing against those calling for violence.

By your logic, when Scott Morrison vowed to "stamp out bullying" of women MPs in his own party, he was actually advocating violence against them too? Is that honestly the argument you want to run with?


You seem to have had no problem with the racists for Gaza march the other day, displaying terrorist symbols and calling for the death of Israelis and involving known terrorist advocates and terrorist organisation members. Now decent Australians have had enough and want their own march you bitch and moan and scream RACIST!!, totally ignoring the obvious call to violence in the statement by the anti Australian leftists who are proposing their own demonstration designed to conflict with the Australians.    Roll Eyes


The overwhelming majority of those protestors support no terrorist organisations, displayed no such symbols and are the abolute furtherst form racist that a person can be. Sure there were some angrier folk there but that's to be expected at any such event.

For instance, the organiser of the event Greg has brought to our attention by white supremacists you call "decent people" is demanding violence. They are saying we "need" violence.

What do you think of that, Belgarion?


I think you are living in a fantasy land. The symbols and chants were there on display for all to see and the background of many of the participants has been all over the news.

As for the woman in the OP, in your own words : "Sure there were some angrier folk there but that's to be expected at any such event."




Ummm, she's the organiser! I think that's kind of important to the fact.

But are you really arguing that some white supremacists are really decent people? You already said so once but i'm giving you an opportunity to clarify.


This'll be good.

All it requires is a simple, one word, yes or no answer.

Let's see what Bel thinks   Undecided
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36384
Gender: female
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #21 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:06pm
 
Oh, he's gone. Logged off.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #22 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:08pm
 
mothra wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:06pm:
Oh, he's gone. Logged off.


Ah.
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6121
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #23 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:22pm
 
mothra wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:06pm:
Oh, he's gone. Logged off.


I am back after attending to my life away from this sheltered workshop for leftist retards, and my next question that you will no doubt fail to answer, is why do you think the woman is a white supremacist?
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36384
Gender: female
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #24 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:32pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:22pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:06pm:
Oh, he's gone. Logged off.


I am back after attending to my life away from this sheltered workshop for leftist retards, and my next question that you will no doubt fail to answer, is why do you think the woman is a white supremacist?



You think she's protesting Scandinavian immigrants?

Not really a long bow t draw now is it.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36384
Gender: female
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #25 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:38pm
 
Unsurprising deflection. Wasn't a comfortable question was it, Belgarion.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #26 - Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:03pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 5:57pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 5:47pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 3:55pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:53pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 2:16pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 1:11pm:
"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence ahead of the nationwide events that already have police in capital cities on alert."


Why is it always the same breed of people who immediately default to playing the victim?

We're dealing with a pack of right-wing, self-proclaimed white supremacists, openly marching to promote racism. The organiser of their little rally has been exposed in leaked audio flat-out saying "we need violence". Their intent could not be clearer, they want violence.

And you're lining up to defend them?  What?!

Yet somehow, when their opposition says this racist nonsense needs to be stamped out, you twist that into proof the left are the real aggressors calling for violence?

The same left who are literally standing against those calling for violence.

By your logic, when Scott Morrison vowed to "stamp out bullying" of women MPs in his own party, he was actually advocating violence against them too? Is that honestly the argument you want to run with?


You seem to have had no problem with the racists for Gaza march the other day, displaying terrorist symbols and calling for the death of Israelis and involving known terrorist advocates and terrorist organisation members. Now decent Australians have had enough and want their own march you bitch and moan and scream RACIST!!, totally ignoring the obvious call to violence in the statement by the anti Australian leftists who are proposing their own demonstration designed to conflict with the Australians.    Roll Eyes


The overwhelming majority of those protestors support no terrorist organisations, displayed no such symbols and are the abolute furtherst form racist that a person can be. Sure there were some angrier folk there but that's to be expected at any such event.

For instance, the organiser of the event Greg has brought to our attention by white supremacists you call "decent people" is demanding violence. They are saying we "need" violence.

What do you think of that, Belgarion?


I think you are living in a fantasy land. The symbols and chants were there on display for all to see and the background of many of the participants has been all over the news.

As for the woman in the OP, in your own words : "Sure there were some angrier folk there but that's to be expected at any such event."




Ummm, she's the organiser! I think that's kind of important to the fact.

But are you really arguing that some white supremacists are really decent people? You already said so once but i'm giving you an opportunity to clarify.


This'll be good.

All it requires is a simple, one word, yes or no answer.

Let's see what Bel thinks   Undecided


Yes or no, Bel?

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21931
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #27 - Aug 23rd, 2025 at 7:27am
 
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 5:40pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 3:18pm:
Goalpost change much?


Unable to face reality much? Roll Eyes


It's off topic.

If some people were chanting "death to Israel" or waving terrorist symbols, then yes, they should be condemned.

But was that everyone in the march? No.

Do I support the idea that innocent civilians, especially children, shouldn't be killed in Gaza? Of course. Any reasonable person does.

Do I twist that into an excuse for open white supremacy just because "why not"? No.

And none of that changes the fact that the organisers of what you're trying to pass off as a "counter march" to an anti-war protest were explicitly calling for violence, saying they "need it".

So the real question is this: why are you standing shoulder to shoulder with white supremacist groups, trying to sanitise them, and pretending their anti-immigration rallies are somehow on the same moral ground as marches demanding an end to the war in Gaza?

Seriously, what is wrong with you?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36384
Gender: female
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #28 - Aug 26th, 2025 at 9:37am
 
Wowsers, Belgarion really didn't want to answer the question, did he.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57245
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #29 - Aug 26th, 2025 at 6:45pm
 
It is NOT 'white supremacist' to want to limit immigration from anywhere.
Nor is it 'white supremacist' to want to limit it from coutries whose people are harder to assimilate/refuse to assimilate. And yes, assimilation is good aim and is not 'white supremacist'.



In Oman the Shura Council has decreed that the migrant class can be no more than a third of the total population. If you'd propose the same law for Australia, Europe or America it would be called, of course, totally white supremacist. But Omanis are brown. So  .... er.... OH!! LOOKOVER THERE!

https://web.archive.org/web/20171031144453/http://gulfmigration.eu/media/pubs/ex...


The Uniparty in Australia and Europe are as crap as each other on large scale unassimilating third world immigration and its flow on pathologies. There is no good argument for such mass migration from ANY source, let alone from alien/hostile cultures.

There has been a total failure by the Uniparty to respond to electoral, democratic pressure on immigration. So it is no wonder that people are talking about bringing non-electoral pressure to bear. You cannot repress people for ever, the pressure will erupt somewhere. It is bound to.You can't PR 'manage' the increasing pathologies of mass third world immigration.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 89988
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #30 - Aug 26th, 2025 at 6:54pm
 
mothra wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:32pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:22pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:06pm:
Oh, he's gone. Logged off.


I am back after attending to my life away from this sheltered workshop for leftist retards, and my next question that you will no doubt fail to answer, is why do you think the woman is a white supremacist?



You think she's protesting Scandinavian immigrants?

Not really a long bow t draw now is it.


So she didn't actually SAY what the claim was - about Australia for the Wharte Man???  If she had, you only have to post it via link ... not wonder about Scandinavians...  I'm getting to know a lovely Scandi lady.... hmmmm ...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6121
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #31 - Aug 26th, 2025 at 7:00pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
Ummm, she's the organiser! I think that's kind of important to the fact.

But are you really arguing that some white supremacists are really decent people? You already said so once but i'm giving you an opportunity to clarify.


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
This'll be good.

All it requires is a simple, one word, yes or no answer.

Let's see what Bel thinks   Undecided


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
Yes or no, Bel?



You expect me to justify a position you have decided I support. Sorry to disappoint you, so how about answering why do you think this woman is a white supremacist?

Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 89988
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #32 - Aug 26th, 2025 at 7:01pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 5:43pm:
"A group of radical left-wing groups in Melbourne have vowed to “stamp out” controversial anti-immigration rallies planned for August 31, raising fears of violence"

The left wing is in their own words, clearly promoting violence 





To be expected of that lot of hilarious clowns who wear hoodies and black and wave terrorist flags and such... the REAL government behind Albo will be having a field day filming and photographing them and infiltrating them... for future rendition, you understand.

You don't actually believe Albo and his government support these mad lefties, do you?  They are Trotskyites - common Communist folk demanding equal billing with government ...  they would oppose HIS form of Stalinist government... and he will take care of that, you mark my words...

Could be a great movie in this if one could assemble good footage of this rising civil war between the True Left of Australian Fair
Go and the ratbags of the 'progressive' groups... the True Left are just wanting a fair go for everyone - the 'progressives' are all out for everything for themselves... 

Be interesting to see some of those hooded cowards assaulting grannies who march for their country and flag...

Bet each way Albo is correct at every turn... it's not just Chalmers who is a snake... (Snake Chalmers)...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #33 - Aug 26th, 2025 at 7:07pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Aug 26th, 2025 at 7:00pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
Ummm, she's the organiser! I think that's kind of important to the fact.

But are you really arguing that some white supremacists are really decent people? You already said so once but i'm giving you an opportunity to clarify.


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
This'll be good.

All it requires is a simple, one word, yes or no answer.

Let's see what Bel thinks   Undecided


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
Yes or no, Bel?



You expect me to justify a position you have decided I support. Sorry to disappoint you, so how about answering why do you think this woman is a white supremacist?



I'm asking you a simple question:

Do you think that some white supremacists are decent people?

Why is this so hard to answer?

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57245
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #34 - Aug 26th, 2025 at 8:33pm
 
mothra wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:32pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:22pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 6:06pm:
Oh, he's gone. Logged off.


I am back after attending to my life away from this sheltered workshop for leftist retards, and my next question that you will no doubt fail to answer, is why do you think the woman is a white supremacist?



You think she's protesting Scandinavian immigrants?

Not really a long bow t draw now is it.

Your hoof is showing, dishonest frightbat.

You DO recognise the difference between Scandinavians and Somalis and Niggerians.



Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21931
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #35 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 7:10am
 
mothra wrote on Aug 26th, 2025 at 9:37am:
Wowsers, Belgarion really didn't want to answer the question, did he.


All they have to do is wait for the page to flip and they can ignore it forever.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #36 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 9:34am
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 7:10am:
mothra wrote on Aug 26th, 2025 at 9:37am:
Wowsers, Belgarion really didn't want to answer the question, did he.


All they have to do is wait for the page to flip and they can ignore it forever.


True, but at least now we all know what the answer is.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57245
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #37 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:17am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 26th, 2025 at 7:07pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 26th, 2025 at 7:00pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
Ummm, she's the organiser! I think that's kind of important to the fact.

But are you really arguing that some white supremacists are really decent people? You already said so once but i'm giving you an opportunity to clarify.


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
This'll be good.

All it requires is a simple, one word, yes or no answer.

Let's see what Bel thinks   Undecided


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
Yes or no, Bel?



You expect me to justify a position you have decided I support. Sorry to disappoint you, so how about answering why do you think this woman is a white supremacist?



I'm asking you a simple question:

Do you think that some white supremacists are decent people?

Why is this so hard to answer?




What?! You don't think that white majority countries are better than, say, black majority countries?  Do you think that African and European countries are indistinguishable?

Of course not. You, like everyone else, including Africans, recognise that white ajority countries are better (superior, in Latinate English). That is why the traffic is one way, from brown/balck countries to white countries.
Once you compare - and comparisons are inevitable in every aspect of life, not just in this regard - you establish a rank order of  better and worse, superior and inferior, preferable and less desirable/undesirble and so on. 
Why there are superior and inferior countries (or anything else) is a different although related issue. That there IS a difference and therefore a rank order, is obvious and undeniable.

There is, of course, such rank order even among white majority as well as black majority countries, Finland being obviously preferable to Belorus next door, or Namibia being superior to the DRC.

You are just playing silly buggers about the word 'supremacist'.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #38 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:19am
 
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:17am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 26th, 2025 at 7:07pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 26th, 2025 at 7:00pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
Ummm, she's the organiser! I think that's kind of important to the fact.

But are you really arguing that some white supremacists are really decent people? You already said so once but i'm giving you an opportunity to clarify.


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
This'll be good.

All it requires is a simple, one word, yes or no answer.

Let's see what Bel thinks   Undecided


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
Yes or no, Bel?



You expect me to justify a position you have decided I support. Sorry to disappoint you, so how about answering why do you think this woman is a white supremacist?



I'm asking you a simple question:

Do you think that some white supremacists are decent people?

Why is this so hard to answer?




What?



Do you think that some white supremacists are decent people?

Yes, or no?
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57245
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #39 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:32am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:19am:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:17am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 26th, 2025 at 7:07pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 26th, 2025 at 7:00pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
Ummm, she's the organiser! I think that's kind of important to the fact.

But are you really arguing that some white supremacists are really decent people? You already said so once but i'm giving you an opportunity to clarify.


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
This'll be good.

All it requires is a simple, one word, yes or no answer.

Let's see what Bel thinks   Undecided


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
Yes or no, Bel?



You expect me to justify a position you have decided I support. Sorry to disappoint you, so how about answering why do you think this woman is a white supremacist?



I'm asking you a simple question:

Do you think that some white supremacists are decent people?

Why is this so hard to answer?




What?



Do you think that some white supremacists are decent people?

Yes, or no?


I am not accepting your definition sight unseen, since you have not provided it. Give us an explanation of what you mean by it like I provided my take and meaning of it. Don't ignore it, it is an important clarification. Do you accept my definition/understanding of it?

Yes or no?
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #40 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:50am
 
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:32am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:19am:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:17am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 26th, 2025 at 7:07pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 26th, 2025 at 7:00pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
Ummm, she's the organiser! I think that's kind of important to the fact.

But are you really arguing that some white supremacists are really decent people? You already said so once but i'm giving you an opportunity to clarify.


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
This'll be good.

All it requires is a simple, one word, yes or no answer.

Let's see what Bel thinks   Undecided


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
Yes or no, Bel?



You expect me to justify a position you have decided I support. Sorry to disappoint you, so how about answering why do you think this woman is a white supremacist?



I'm asking you a simple question:

Do you think that some white supremacists are decent people?

Why is this so hard to answer?




What?



Do you think that some white supremacists are decent people?

Yes, or no?


I am not accepting your definition sight unseen, since you have not provided it. Give us an explanation of what you mean by it like I provided my take and meaning of it. Don't ignore it, it is an important clarification. Do you accept my definition/understanding of it?

Yes or no?


"white supremacist: a person who believes that white people constitute a superior race and should therefore dominate society, typically to the exclusion or detriment of other racial and ethnic groups."

Do you think that some white supremacists are decent people?
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57245
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #41 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 11:32am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:50am:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:32am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:19am:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:17am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 26th, 2025 at 7:07pm:
Belgarion wrote on Aug 26th, 2025 at 7:00pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
Ummm, she's the organiser! I think that's kind of important to the fact.

But are you really arguing that some white supremacists are really decent people? You already said so once but i'm giving you an opportunity to clarify.


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
This'll be good.

All it requires is a simple, one word, yes or no answer.

Let's see what Bel thinks   Undecided


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:
Yes or no, Bel?



You expect me to justify a position you have decided I support. Sorry to disappoint you, so how about answering why do you think this woman is a white supremacist?



I'm asking you a simple question:

Do you think that some white supremacists are decent people?

Why is this so hard to answer?




What?



Do you think that some white supremacists are decent people?

Yes, or no?


I am not accepting your definition sight unseen, since you have not provided it. Give us an explanation of what you mean by it like I provided my take and meaning of it. Don't ignore it, it is an important clarification. Do you accept my definition/understanding of it?

Yes or no?


"white supremacist: a person who believes that white people constitute a superior race and should therefore dominate society, typically to the exclusion or detriment of other racial and ethnic groups."

Do you think that some white supremacists are decent people?



On my definition yes, on your definition no.

It is much more about culture and assimilation than merely race. I think Thomas Sowell or Jacinta Price, for example, are ininitely preferable to you, even though they are black/ish and you are white. But Slovenia is preferable (without you in it especially) to the darker Democratic Republic of Congo or the blonderBelarus.


You are just playing silly bugger games as usual.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21931
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #42 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 12:49pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 11:32am:
On my definition yes, on your definition no.


We all see the way you twist things to protect your little fantasy world, untouched by reality. At least you've now admitted it, so thanks for that.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57245
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #43 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 1:50pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 12:49pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 11:32am:
On my definition yes, on your definition no.


We all see the way you twist things to protect your little fantasy world, untouched by reality. At least you've now admitted it, so thanks for that.

What?! You don't think that white majority countries are better than, say, black majority countries?  Do you think that African and European countries are indistinguishable?

Of course not. You, like everyone else, including Africans, recognise that white majority countries are better (superior, in Latinate English). That is why the traffic is one way, from brown/balck countries to white countries.
Once you compare - and comparisons are inevitable in every aspect of life, not just in this regard - you establish a rank order of  better and worse, superior and inferior, preferable and less desirable/undesirable and so on.
Why there are superior and inferior countries (or anything else) is a different although related issue. That there IS a difference and therefore a rank order, is obvious and undeniable.

There is, of course, such rank order even among white majority as well as black majority countries, Finland being obviously preferable to Belorus next door, or Namibia being superior to the DRC.

You too are just playing silly buggers about the word 'supremacist, teapot.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #44 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 3:02pm
 

I just learned some good news.

Milton Alexander Linder died last month  Smiley

Not sure what the cause of death was though.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21931
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #45 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 3:27pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 1:50pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 12:49pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 11:32am:
On my definition yes, on your definition no.


We all see the way you twist things to protect your little fantasy world, untouched by reality. At least you've now admitted it, so thanks for that.

What?! You don't think that white majority countries are better than, say, black majority countries?  Do you think that African and European countries are indistinguishable?


Your problem is that you can't get your head around the simple truth, it's not the colour of people's skin that makes a country better or worse, no matter how desperately you want to obsess over it.

Australia isn't ahead of the nations you keep harping on about because of racial makeup. It's because we're a capitalist democracy with guaranteed and implied freedoms, universal healthcare, workers' rights and protections, food security, a mostly hospitable climate, first-world infrastructure, and a generous minimum wage.

You're trying to simplify it to race because it puts you on top without having to try.  What happened to your hard on for merit?

By constantly dragging the conversation back to skin colour, you're exposing your own supremacist leanings. That's not on anyone else, that's entirely on you.

So have your sook, throw out your insults and pretend to be the victim all you like.  All you're doing is further proving who and what you are.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57245
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #46 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 5:27pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 3:27pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 1:50pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 12:49pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 11:32am:
On my definition yes, on your definition no.


We all see the way you twist things to protect your little fantasy world, untouched by reality. At least you've now admitted it, so thanks for that.

What?! You don't think that white majority countries are better than, say, black majority countries?  Do you think that African and European countries are indistinguishable?


Your problem is that you can't get your head around the simple truth, it's not the colour of people's skin that makes a country better or worse, no matter how desperately you want to obsess over it.


Who said this, then?

Quote:
It is much more about culture and assimilation than merely race. I think Thomas Sowell or Jacinta Price, for example, are ininitely preferable to you, even though they are black/ish and you are white. But Slovenia is preferable (without you in it especially) to the darker Democratic Republic of Congo or the blonderBelarus.



Why did you ignore it, cut it from my post and then rant as if I had not said it?

You ARE dishonest, teapot, no better than creepy gweggy. You do sneak, cut, misrepresent and misinterpret on purpose, so as to get in your 200 word idiotic overwrought blather.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 27th, 2025 at 5:35pm by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21931
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #47 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 5:46pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 5:27pm:
Why did you ignore it, cut it from my post and then rant as if I had not said it?


I didn't ignore what you said, here is your full, unedited quote:

Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 1:50pm:
What?! You don't think that white majority countries are better than, say, black majority countries?  Do you think that African and European countries are indistinguishable?

Of course not. You, like everyone else, including Africans, recognise that white majority countries are better (superior, in Latinate English). That is why the traffic is one way, from brown/balck countries to white countries.
Once you compare - and comparisons are inevitable in every aspect of life, not just in this regard - you establish a rank order of  better and worse, superior and inferior, preferable and less desirable/undesirable and so on.
Why there are superior and inferior countries (or anything else) is a different although related issue. That there IS a difference and therefore a rank order, is obvious and undeniable.

There is, of course, such rank order even among white majority as well as black majority countries, Finland being obviously preferable to Belorus next door, or Namibia being superior to the DRC.

You too are just playing silly buggers about the word 'supremacist, teapot.


You made it abundantly clear this was about white supremacy in the old-fashioned sense. You made no reference to anything beyond skin colour, specifically the majority white population, as the supposed marker of superiority in the countries you cited.

If you now want to drag in other comments you've made as a belated get-out-of-jail-free card to downplay the reality of your views, that's your choice. But let's be honest, you don't extend me the courtesy of context, or of considering full comments in their entirety, FULL STOP.

So forgive me if I don't extend to you the courtesy you refuse to extend to me. Instead, I'll extend to you the invitation to go fornicate with yourself, you racist, bigoted piece of crap.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6121
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #48 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 8:49pm
 
Everyone who disagrees with the flawed concepts of multiculturalism and unchecked immigration is a white supremacist according to the usual suspects. This simple accusation repeated ad nauseam saves them from actually having to make a logical argument.  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57245
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #49 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 9:00pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 5:46pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 5:27pm:
Why did you ignore it, cut it from my post and then rant as if I had not said it?


I didn't ignore what you said, here is your full, unedited quote:

Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 1:50pm:
What?! You don't think that white majority countries are better than, say, black majority countries?  Do you think that African and European countries are indistinguishable?

Of course not. You, like everyone else, including Africans, recognise that white majority countries are better (superior, in Latinate English). That is why the traffic is one way, from brown/balck countries to white countries.
Once you compare - and comparisons are inevitable in every aspect of life, not just in this regard - you establish a rank order of  better and worse, superior and inferior, preferable and less desirable/undesirable and so on.
Why there are superior and inferior countries (or anything else) is a different although related issue. That there IS a difference and therefore a rank order, is obvious and undeniable.

There is, of course, such rank order even among white majority as well as black majority countries, Finland being obviously preferable to Belorus next door, or Namibia being superior to the DRC.

You too are just playing silly buggers about the word 'supremacist, teapot.


You made it abundantly clear this was about white supremacy in the old-fashioned sense. You made no reference to anything beyond skin colour, specifically the majority white population, as the supposed marker of superiority in the countries you cited.

If you now want to drag in other comments you've made as a belated get-out-of-jail-free card to downplay the reality of your views, that's your choice. But let's be honest, you don't extend me the courtesy of context, or of considering full comments in their entirety, FULL STOP.

So forgive me if I don't extend to you the courtesy you refuse to extend to me. Instead, I'll extend to you the invitation to go fornicate with yourself, you racist, bigoted piece of crap.

You are lying again, creepy little teapot.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57245
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #50 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 9:02pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 5:46pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 5:27pm:
Why did you ignore it, cut it from my post and then rant as if I had not said it?


I didn't ignore what you said, here is your full, unedited quote:

Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 1:50pm:
What?! You don't think that white majority countries are better than, say, black majority countries?  Do you think that African and European countries are indistinguishable?

Of course not. You, like everyone else, including Africans, recognise that white majority countries are better (superior, in Latinate English). That is why the traffic is one way, from brown/balck countries to white countries.
Once you compare - and comparisons are inevitable in every aspect of life, not just in this regard - you establish a rank order of  better and worse, superior and inferior, preferable and less desirable/undesirable and so on.
Why there are superior and inferior countries (or anything else) is a different although related issue. That there IS a difference and therefore a rank order, is obvious and undeniable.

There is, of course, such rank order even among white majority as well as black majority countries, Finland being obviously preferable to Belorus next door, or Namibia being superior to the DRC.

You too are just playing silly buggers about the word 'supremacist, teapot.


You made it abundantly clear this was about white supremacy in the old-fashioned sense. You made no reference to anything beyond skin colour, specifically the majority white population, as the supposed marker of superiority in the countries you cited.

If you now want to drag in other comments you've made as a belated get-out-of-jail-free card to downplay the reality of your views, that's your choice. But let's be honest, you don't extend me the courtesy of context, or of considering full comments in their entirety, FULL STOP.

So forgive me if I don't extend to you the courtesy you refuse to extend to me. Instead, I'll extend to you the invitation to go fornicate with yourself, you racist, bigoted piece of crap.

You are lying again, creepy little teapot.

Here's my post.

You deleted/ignored the pertinent bit to allow yourself your moronc little dishonest blather.

Despicable.

This is what you partially quoted and responded to, lying little mong. Why are you woke toddlers lie so fluently, readily, constantly?


https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755741396/41#41

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21931
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #51 - Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:25pm
 
I quoted the full post I replied to, in full context, unedited, you lying sack of crap.

If you don't like what the mirror shows then change dumb ass.

You even quoted it, twice, dummy...

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 3:27pm:
So have your sook, throw out your insults and pretend to be the victim all you like.  All you're doing is further proving who and what you are.


Couldn't have said it better myself... Oh wait, I did say that...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57245
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #52 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 7:39am
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:25pm:
I quoted the full post I replied to, in full context, unedited, you lying sack of crap.




You are lying, little arse covered.

This was my full post:

Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 11:32am:
On my definition yes, on your definition no.

It is much more about culture and assimilation than merely race. I think Thomas Sowell or Jacinta Price, for example, are ininitely preferable to you, even though they are black/ish and you are white. But Slovenia is preferable (without you in it especially) to the darker Democratic Republic of Congo or the blonderBelarus.


You are just playing silly bugger games as usual.


You responded to the first sentence with a stupid misrepresentation and deleted the rest.

Have a look, ya little 'intellectuak' squirmer.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755741396/42#42
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21931
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #53 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 10:38am
 
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 7:39am:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:25pm:
I quoted the full post I replied to, in full context, unedited, you lying sack of crap.



You are lying, little arse covered.

This was my full post:

Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 11:32am:
On my definition yes, on your definition no.

It is much more about culture and assimilation than merely race. I think Thomas Sowell or Jacinta Price, for example, are ininitely preferable to you, even though they are black/ish and you are white. But Slovenia is preferable (without you in it especially) to the darker Democratic Republic of Congo or the blonderBelarus.


You are just playing silly bugger games as usual.


You responded to the first sentence with a stupid misrepresentation and deleted the rest.

Have a look, ya little 'intellectuak' squirmer.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755741396/42#42


I don't appreciate your constant, baseless accusations of lying, particularly coming from someone as flagrantly loose with the truth as you.

This all started because I replied to your post here,

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755741396/43#43

I quoted you in my reply,

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 3:27pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 1:50pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 12:49pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 11:32am:
On my definition yes, on your definition no.


We all see the way you twist things to protect your little fantasy world, untouched by reality. At least you've now admitted it, so thanks for that.

What?! You don't think that white majority countries are better than, say, black majority countries?  Do you think that African and European countries are indistinguishable?


Your problem is that you can't get your head around the simple truth, it's not the colour of people's skin that makes a country better or worse, no matter how desperately you want to obsess over it.

Australia isn't ahead of the nations you keep harping on about because of racial makeup. It's because we're a capitalist democracy with guaranteed and implied freedoms, universal healthcare, workers' rights and protections, food security, a mostly hospitable climate, first-world infrastructure, and a generous minimum wage.

You're trying to simplify it to race because it puts you on top without having to try.  What happened to your hard on for merit?

By constantly dragging the conversation back to skin colour, you're exposing your own supremacist leanings. That's not on anyone else, that's entirely on you.

So have your sook, throw out your insults and pretend to be the victim all you like.  All you're doing is further proving who and what you are.


You took issue with me not quoting your whole reply in this post as you made clear here,

Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 5:27pm:
Why did you ignore it, cut it from my post and then rant as if I had not said it?


So I quoted the whole post a replied to and sure enough, it only made you look worse,

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 5:46pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 5:27pm:
Why did you ignore it, cut it from my post and then rant as if I had not said it?


I didn't ignore what you said, here is your full, unedited quote:

Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 1:50pm:
What?! You don't think that white majority countries are better than, say, black majority countries?  Do you think that African and European countries are indistinguishable?

Of course not. You, like everyone else, including Africans, recognise that white majority countries are better (superior, in Latinate English). That is why the traffic is one way, from brown/balck countries to white countries.
Once you compare - and comparisons are inevitable in every aspect of life, not just in this regard - you establish a rank order of  better and worse, superior and inferior, preferable and less desirable/undesirable and so on.
Why there are superior and inferior countries (or anything else) is a different although related issue. That there IS a difference and therefore a rank order, is obvious and undeniable.

There is, of course, such rank order even among white majority as well as black majority countries, Finland being obviously preferable to Belorus next door, or Namibia being superior to the DRC.

You too are just playing silly buggers about the word 'supremacist, teapot.


You made it abundantly clear this was about white supremacy in the old-fashioned sense. You made no reference to anything beyond skin colour, specifically the majority white population, as the supposed marker of superiority in the countries you cited.

If you now want to drag in other comments you've made as a belated get-out-of-jail-free card to downplay the reality of your views, that's your choice. But let's be honest, you don't extend me the courtesy of context, or of considering full comments in their entirety, FULL STOP.

So forgive me if I don't extend to you the courtesy you refuse to extend to me. Instead, I'll extend to you the invitation to go fornicate with yourself, you racist, bigoted piece of crap.


Continued below >>
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21931
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #54 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 10:39am
 
In that reply I pointed out where you'd deliberately lifted a quote of mine out of context, cherry-picked it, and then spun outright falsehoods about me. You've made no effort to correct this. In fact, you've doubled down and reposted your lies.

I posted your full quote in which you spoke only about skin colour and race. I didn't edit it, I didn't distort it. Now you want to drag in other posts of yours that supposedly offer "context". I'm happy to entertain that, but only after you correct the falsehoods you've peddled about me.

If you can't do that, if you can't admit you lied, admit you cherry-picked, admit you smeared me dishonestly, why on earth would I help you sanitise your own racism and white-supremacist garbage?

If you don't like having your own behaviour turned back on you, then perhaps stop behaving that way. The onus is on you to change. I owe you nothing.

And since you're always the first to collapse into name-calling and playground insults the moment you're cornered, it's actually you who's running a courtesy or simple baseline respect debt here. I know you'll never settle it, you're too petty, too fragile, too much of a little bitch. So don't whine about being denied what you won't extend yourself.

Until you can argue in good faith, don't expect any in return, you pathetic, whiny little bitch.

Always the victim...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57245
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #55 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 11:25am
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 10:38am:
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 7:39am:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:25pm:
I quoted the full post I replied to, in full context, unedited, you lying sack of crap.



You are lying, little arse covered.

This was my full post:

Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 11:32am:
On my definition yes, on your definition no.

It is much more about culture and assimilation than merely race. I think Thomas Sowell or Jacinta Price, for example, are ininitely preferable to you, even though they are black/ish and you are white. But Slovenia is preferable (without you in it especially) to the darker Democratic Republic of Congo or the blonderBelarus.


You are just playing silly bugger games as usual.


You responded to the first sentence with a stupid misrepresentation and deleted the rest.

Have a look, ya little 'intellectuak' squirmer.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755741396/42#42


I don't appreciate your constant, baseless accusations of lying, particularly coming from someone as flagrantly loose with the truth as you.

This all started because I replied to your post here,

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755741396/43#43


A lie.

In fact it started here:
https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755741396/42#42
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21931
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #56 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 11:47am
 
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 11:25am:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 10:38am:
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 7:39am:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:25pm:
I quoted the full post I replied to, in full context, unedited, you lying sack of crap.



You are lying, little arse covered.

This was my full post:

Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 11:32am:
On my definition yes, on your definition no.

It is much more about culture and assimilation than merely race. I think Thomas Sowell or Jacinta Price, for example, are ininitely preferable to you, even though they are black/ish and you are white. But Slovenia is preferable (without you in it especially) to the darker Democratic Republic of Congo or the blonderBelarus.


You are just playing silly bugger games as usual.


You responded to the first sentence with a stupid misrepresentation and deleted the rest.

Have a look, ya little 'intellectuak' squirmer.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755741396/42#42


I don't appreciate your constant, baseless accusations of lying, particularly coming from someone as flagrantly loose with the truth as you.

This all started because I replied to your post here,

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755741396/43#43


A lie.

In fact it started here:
https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755741396/42#42


I never replied to that post, I replied to a different one.

I don't know what you want from me.

You can start by correcting your lies about me, and then, maybe, I'll consider including some of your past posts in a feeble attempt to whitewash your racism.

But dear, ladies first.

If you can't admit to, or correct, your fabrications about me and your selective quoting, then you can eat an entire bag of dicks before your request will even be entertained.

After your long, well-documented trail of disrespect and insults, you are owed no good faith.

You are entitled to nothing.

Though your sense of entitlement is strong, your grasp of reality isn't.

You are not the victim here. You are simply experiencing a taste of the contempt you so eagerly dish out, reduced to a cowering, blithering mess when confronted by it.

You can dish it out, but you can't take it? Absolutely pathetic.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57245
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #57 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 11:52am
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 11:47am:
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 11:25am:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 10:38am:
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 7:39am:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 10:25pm:
I quoted the full post I replied to, in full context, unedited, you lying sack of crap.



You are lying, little arse covered.

This was my full post:

Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 11:32am:
On my definition yes, on your definition no.

It is much more about culture and assimilation than merely race. I think Thomas Sowell or Jacinta Price, for example, are ininitely preferable to you, even though they are black/ish and you are white. But Slovenia is preferable (without you in it especially) to the darker Democratic Republic of Congo or the blonderBelarus.


You are just playing silly bugger games as usual.


You responded to the first sentence with a stupid misrepresentation and deleted the rest.

Have a look, ya little 'intellectuak' squirmer.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755741396/42#42


I don't appreciate your constant, baseless accusations of lying, particularly coming from someone as flagrantly loose with the truth as you.

This all started because I replied to your post here,

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755741396/43#43


A lie.

In fact it started here:
https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755741396/42#42


I never replied to that post, I replied to a different one.


Bollocks, silly little teapot. You are obviously lying.  Click on the link, reply No 42. It is your reply to a post of mine that you truncated, leaving out the pertinent bit.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 12:49pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 11:32am:
On my definition yes, on your definition no.


We all see the way you twist things to protect your little fantasy world, untouched by reality. At least you've now admitted it, so thanks for that.




Now bugger orf.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21931
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #58 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 11:57am
 
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 11:52am:
Now bugger orf.


So you've chosen the bag of dicks?

I knew it.  You and Bobbi are the same.

You're a weak, pathetic excuse for a man.

You posture as though you're tough, yet every time you're pressed, you retreat into victimhood and dodge accountability and responsibility.

It must gnaw at you, knowing how utterly pathetic you are.

No wonder your only instinct is to lash out at others.

And in this case, not only are you trying to avoid accountability for the things you said, in black and white, but also the lies you've said about others...

Be better Frank...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 37520
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #59 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 12:42pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 11:57am:
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 11:52am:
Now bugger orf.


So you've chosen the bag of dicks?

I knew it.  You and Bobbi are the same.

You're a weak, pathetic excuse for a man.

You posture as though you're tough, yet every time you're pressed, you retreat into victimhood and dodge accountability and responsibility.

It must gnaw at you, knowing how utterly pathetic you are.

No wonder your only instinct is to lash out at others.

And in this case, not only are you trying to avoid accountability for the things you said, in black and white, but also the lies you've said about others...

Be better Frank...




Consider yourself officially "scalded" frank  Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150900
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #60 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 12:45pm
 

Bec Freedom - the organiser of the right-wing rally:

“We need violence, I’m sorry, but we need f**king violence.”
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57245
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #61 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 1:58pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 11:57am:
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 11:52am:
Now bugger orf.


So you've chosen the bag of dicks?

I knew it.  You and Bobbi are the same.

You're a weak, pathetic excuse for a man.

You posture as though you're tough, yet every time you're pressed, you retreat into victimhood and dodge accountability and responsibility.

It must gnaw at you, knowing how utterly pathetic you are.

No wonder your only instinct is to lash out at others.

And in this case, not only are you trying to avoid accountability for the things you said, in black and white, but also the lies you've said about others...

Be better Frank...



Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Bollocks, lying little blowhard.
Click on the link, reply No 42. It is your reply to a post of mine that you truncated, leaving out the pertinent bit.  Stop lying.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 12:49pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 11:32am:
On my definition yes, on your definition no.


We all see the way you twist things to protect your little fantasy world, untouched by reality. At least you've now admitted it, so thanks for that.




Now bugger orf.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21931
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #62 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 2:28pm
 
So where in this post, which I've quoted in full, did you talk about anything not race or skin colour related?

Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 1:50pm:
What?! You don't think that white majority countries are better than, say, black majority countries?  Do you think that African and European countries are indistinguishable?

Of course not. You, like everyone else, including Africans, recognise that white majority countries are better (superior, in Latinate English). That is why the traffic is one way, from brown/balck countries to white countries.
Once you compare - and comparisons are inevitable in every aspect of life, not just in this regard - you establish a rank order of  better and worse, superior and inferior, preferable and less desirable/undesirable and so on.
Why there are superior and inferior countries (or anything else) is a different although related issue. That there IS a difference and therefore a rank order, is obvious and undeniable.

There is, of course, such rank order even among white majority as well as black majority countries, Finland being obviously preferable to Belorus next door, or Namibia being superior to the DRC.

You too are just playing silly buggers about the word 'supremacist, teapot.


Well?

I even gave you an out, listing some of the reasons why in my opinion, Australia is a great country to live in and better than many of the alternatives.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 3:27pm:
Australia isn't ahead of the nations you keep harping on about because of racial makeup. It's because we're a capitalist democracy with guaranteed and implied freedoms, universal healthcare, workers' rights and protections, food security, a mostly hospitable climate, first-world infrastructure, and a generous minimum wage.


We really are lucky to live here.

But you still want to blame me for quoting you, in full, for the racist things you said?

The problem isn't the spotlight I aimed at you, the problem is what it revealed.

It's not like you're a serial child predator or anything.

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57245
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #63 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 2:32pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 2:28pm:
So where in this post, which I've quoted in full, did you talk about anything not race or skin colour related?

Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 1:50pm:
What?! You don't think that white majority countries are better than, say, black majority countries?  Do you think that African and European countries are indistinguishable?

Of course not. You, like everyone else, including Africans, recognise that white majority countries are better (superior, in Latinate English). That is why the traffic is one way, from brown/balck countries to white countries.
Once you compare - and comparisons are inevitable in every aspect of life, not just in this regard - you establish a rank order of  better and worse, superior and inferior, preferable and less desirable/undesirable and so on.
Why there are superior and inferior countries (or anything else) is a different although related issue. That there IS a difference and therefore a rank order, is obvious and undeniable.

There is, of course, such rank order even among white majority as well as black majority countries, Finland being obviously preferable to Belorus next door, or Namibia being superior to the DRC.

You too are just playing silly buggers about the word 'supremacist, teapot.


Well?

I even gave you an out, listing some of the reasons why in my opinion, Australia is a great country to live in and better than many of the alternatives.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27th, 2025 at 3:27pm:
Australia isn't ahead of the nations you keep harping on about because of racial makeup. It's because we're a capitalist democracy with guaranteed and implied freedoms, universal healthcare, workers' rights and protections, food security, a mostly hospitable climate, first-world infrastructure, and a generous minimum wage.


We really are lucky to live here.

But you still want to blame me for quoting you, in full, for the racist things you said?

The problem isn't the spotlight I aimed at you, the problem is what it revealed.

https://y.yarn.co/50d81142-43b3-4a1c-a44d-89b340268545_text.gif

Come clean on your post #42. Do not skip it like it isnt the one I actually pulled you up on.

Then we can move on to post # 43.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21931
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #64 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 2:51pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 2:32pm:
Come clean on your post #42. Do not skip it like it isnt the one I actually pulled you up on.

Then we can move on to post # 43.


You first:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755822881/84#84

If you're not able to admit you took that out of context and have been lying about what I've said, why should I extend the same courtesy to you?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57245
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #65 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 3:52pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 2:51pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 2:32pm:
Come clean on your post #42. Do not skip it like it isnt the one I actually pulled you up on.

Then we can move on to post # 43.


You first:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755822881/84#84

If you're not able to admit you took that out of context and have been lying about what I've said, why should I extend the same courtesy to you?

Cheesy Cheesy

Full stop.  It evidently doesn't mean what you think it means.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21931
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #66 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 4:20pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 3:52pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 2:51pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 2:32pm:
Come clean on your post #42. Do not skip it like it isnt the one I actually pulled you up on.

Then we can move on to post # 43.


You first:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755822881/84#84

If you're not able to admit you took that out of context and have been lying about what I've said, why should I extend the same courtesy to you?

Cheesy Cheesy

Full stop.  It evidently doesn't mean what you think it means.



I guess you're too busy abusing children to bother acknowledging the context and previous or subsequent posts, as you're demanding others do for you?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57245
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #67 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 10:21pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 4:20pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 3:52pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 2:51pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 2:32pm:
Come clean on your post #42. Do not skip it like it isnt the one I actually pulled you up on.

Then we can move on to post # 43.


You first:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755822881/84#84

If you're not able to admit you took that out of context and have been lying about what I've said, why should I extend the same courtesy to you?

Cheesy Cheesy

Full stop.  It evidently doesn't mean what you think it means.



I guess you're too busy abusing children to bother acknowledging the context and previous or subsequent posts, as you're demanding others do for you?



The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵


Meenjin, Me AND Jin,


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20453
Gender: male
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #68 - Aug 28th, 2025 at 10:31pm
 
Immigrant says he has Glock with full auto switch.

The only violence will come from deranged leftists

Back to top
 

protest_violence.jpg (48 KB | 16 )
protest_violence.jpg

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21931
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: “We need violence"
Reply #69 - Aug 29th, 2025 at 6:53am
 
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 10:21pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 4:20pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 3:52pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 2:51pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 2:32pm:
Come clean on your post #42. Do not skip it like it isnt the one I actually pulled you up on.

Then we can move on to post # 43.


You first:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1755822881/84#84

If you're not able to admit you took that out of context and have been lying about what I've said, why should I extend the same courtesy to you?

Cheesy Cheesy

Full stop.  It evidently doesn't mean what you think it means.



I guess you're too busy abusing children to bother acknowledging the context and previous or subsequent posts, as you're demanding others do for you?



The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵


Meenjin, Me AND Jin,


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵


That's how it works right? I can make any sort of claim I like, then pretend I didn't, blaming you for not quoting something else?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 2:28pm:
It's not like you're a serial child predator or anything.


So it's your fault, right?

Like you, I was only asking a question, and you left out the part in your quote where I told you that you're not a child predator, so by your defence of the racist things you said, I have also done nothing wrong. 

Ok, I like it.  We can have some fun with this.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print