John Smith wrote on Aug 5^th, 2025 at 8:20pm:

Thanks for lying - again.
Now go and sweep up.

Frank wrote on Aug 5^th, 2025 at 5:44pm:



I don't think of them as that Frank.

To me, the obsession with Trump
The obsession with the strong confident man is a sub Dom sexual fetish.

Probably these obsessed guys had a really weak sauce dad.
He was probably a bit of a loser and mum wore the pants.

That's certainly true in a lot of leftie households nowadays.

Note the obsession with trumps pens shape.
We have had threads started on that

The obsession with stormy and how she described her encounters
The obsession with E Jean who even wrote that it was strangely erotic.
The obsession with Trumps daughter and her ssex life.

Now the obsession with the vaginally flora of malenia.

It's a weird sex based obsession with a guy who is dominating them

I think the cure for leftie intellectuals is to realise they are in a  weird Dom sub fetish and try to find a quality woman who can stop them living vicariously.

I'm pretty sure Freud and nietche would agree.

At its core , the TDS  is about the sexual inadequacy of the guys who want to be seen as nice guys and are resentful that they get no respect for being meek and submissive

aquascoot wrote on Aug 6^th, 2025 at 6:16am:


This is a textbook example of psychological projection wrapped in a poor mans Freud and bastardised Nietzsche. You're bending over backwards to reframe legitimate outrage over abuse, corruption and criminality into some sort of sexual kink fantasy, because you can't defend the actions on their merits, so you turn to deflection, smut and mockery.

You're the one bringing up "vaginal flora" and sex lives, not anyone else. If someone posted about Trump's criminal behaviour, and you immediately leap to "they must be sexually obsessed with him", that says far more about what's going on in your subconscious than anyone else's.

Also, stop dragging Freud and Nietzsche into your fantasy. Freud wrote about repressed trauma, not just sex, and Nietzsche's disdain was for herd morality, not those calling out the rich and powerful for raping children.

You're not channelling philosophy, you're cosplaying as an intellectual to cover for enabling predators.

Your whole post reads like the desperate lashing out of someone who knows they're defending the indefensible. You're not just excusing Trump's documented abuse, you're trying to shame the people who still have the moral clarity to call it out.

Nobody's buying your pop-psychology drivel. If anyone needs to examine their fetishes, it's the guy who keeps reflexively sexualising every mention of criminal behaviour.

aquascoot wrote on Aug 6^th, 2025 at 6:16am:



Yes, that is a strong element. ANother, related one, is the compulson to degrade and humiliate and dehumanise.

They do not merely disagree, protest, critique - they want to simultaneously degrade and demonise. So they make out their opponents to be sexual perverts and mentally sub-human or devilishly demonic (the paradox is lost on them since the dehumanisation is the point).

Solzhenitsyn and others documented this extensively when reporting on the Soviet method of psychologcal strategy and tactics, others have written about the fascists ways of psychologically breaking their opponents. Today we notice these tactics among the left and the militant activists of their various pet identity group.

The phrase, 'her majesty's loyal opposotion' doesn't chime with the Left anymore. opposition to them is evil and/or subhuman. their rhetoric cofirms and reinforces that in their own minds in their every utterance. They are not debating democratic equals who are on their level but think and reason differenly, they are fighting evil demons. There is no 'loyal opposition', no recognised, shared foudation when you are battling evil demons.  This requires their constant sexually, mental and moral dirtying, degrading and dehumanising those who oppose them. 

There are honourable exceptions, some sober, rational voices can still be heard on the Left but they are over-shouted, over-snarled by the mob. It has always been like this.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 6^th, 2025 at 7:45am:



Barefaced, insidious lies wrapped in bombast:


greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 11^th, 2025 at 7:03pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 6^th, 2025 at 7:45am:



You are lying, and you know it, bombastic, shifty little gauleiter of Meanjin.


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 4^th, 2025 at 4:22pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 6^th, 2025 at 9:39am:



Excellent post Frank.

I note that nearly all the left post things like

Melania is going to need dark glasses tomorrow after Trump bashes her.
Gweggy of course says it's well known he rapes her.
They all agree she has to be paid to appear with him.

Where is their evidence.
Where is she going on Oprah like bill gates wife saying how disgusting her husband is.
Where is the kids standing up for their mum if this were true.
They seem a close and fairly functional family.

I think the left just repeat lying possip so much They believe it to be true.


Oh Trump is putins puppet.
Putin has a piss tape.

Now we have Trump staring down putin. Even going to India and telling them they can't buy Russian oil

It's just gossip they convince themselves is true

Amazing lack of self examination

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 6^th, 2025 at 7:45am:



References to the influences of Freud and Nietzsche are apt. They are signposts that are present in any discussion on 'man's soul' in the modern era. They are not the only influeences but they are very significant when psycho-political matters are the topic.
Marx was, in his own inflated self-estimation, a scientist of history and economics. Nietzsche and Freud looked below that mechanical surface into modern man's soul, more artistically than scientifically (pace Feud). As did many others at their direct and indirect prompting since. As every schoolboy knows if he has read more of and about them than what can be gleaned from Wiki.