Bobby. wrote on Aug 3
rd, 2025 at 11:41am:
Since Trump never went to Epstein's island it looks like he is innocent.
Deals for immunity happen every day in the USA so
that the FBI can go after the worst crooks - the Mr. Bigs.
Without eye witness accounts there is often no other way to get them.
Ghislaine would be putting her life in jeopardy to reveal who they are in court -
many such witnesses have been bumped off in the USA - or had "accidents".
Your entire premise rests on the idea that the abuse only happened on Epstein's island, which is factually wrong and intellectually lazy.
Here are just some of the locations where abuse tied to Epstein has been documented or credibly alleged:
- Palm Beach, Florida
- Manhattan, New York
- Little St. James Island, US Virgin Islands ("The Island")
- Zorro Ranch, New Mexico
- Onboard Epstein's private jet ("Lolita Express")
- Paris, France (alleged)
- London, UK (alleged, including links to Ghislaine Maxwell)
So no, Trump not going to "the island" doesn't prove anything, and anyone clinging to that as proof of innocence is either desperate or being deliberately obtuse.
Trump had more than enough overlap with Epstein, both socially and geographically, to warrant suspicion, especially when combined with the things he's publicly said about young girls, his long-standing friendship with Epstein, and his bragging about how he could "get away with" sexual assault.
Surely even you, Bobby, can concede that there's enough smoke here to at least raise serious questions. Or is your defence of Trump now so blind that you're willing to rewrite reality to suit it?