…. before this guy is now under investigation as a pedo.
OMG… slower than taking forever … I ask… was this young bloke with other adults in these child centres?
I’m just shocked at the enormity of it.

https://apple.news/AY81N5JPmQvWJmHK9JZzaSQ

Good GRIEF!!!  What is going in with this world?  What part does DEI have in this?

Jasin wrote on Jul 1^st, 2025 at 6:21pm:


Tiny kids - what is this monster?  Where do they come from?  The greatest trick the paedophile ever pulled on childcare was convincing them he didn't exist.  Truly the face of evil doesn't look evil... look at this guy...

Gon'Mo anyone?  Any supporters yet?  You'll get there ..... one evil at a time ....

Aquarius wrote on Jul 1^st, 2025 at 6:10pm:


I remember that case! OMG it was so frustrating… that poor woman felt she had to do something ….
And I asked as I saw the news about this latest case… weren’t there cctv cams anywhere?
Now I think there is a need for it!
He started as an 18 year old… hardly the mothering type for this type of job 
Something is off… how he shifted around to so many different day cares and areas.
Police now find a lot of disturbing content on his computer.
These cams don’t cost a fortune and should be installed as mandatory in child care centres.

This guy should have his genitals removed, with nothing other then a rusty razor blade and some methylated spirits, then thrown in jail for the rest of his life

Bobby. wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2025 at 8:44am:


Oh definitely! And do they feel dumb not reading the signs if their child/children were being tampered with? Or was this young bloke very good at grooming? (oh how cool… a young man with a charming smile and Tatts! Becomes a fave with kids as he makes them feel special or favoured amongst others? Ssshhh…. It’s a secret and here’s a bag of lollies?)
I’m certain there’s a lot of questions going to be asked and probably not all can be answered.

Those missing Beaumont children were approached many times by a 17 year old pedo that groomed them on the beach they went to. But mainly the older one (10 year old Jane). The little sister would go home and say mockingly to mum…”Jane’s got a boyfriend”

Then easily lured away once the pedo got their confidence and familiarity with him.

Bobby. wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2025 at 8:53am:


Strange as it may seem… in jail….  for whatever time they do for their crime, there’s this silent code of understanding between them all, that any crime against children is a huge no no and I bet these child perpetrators get put in a more isolated area of jail for want of inmates getting their justice their way with that.

John Smith wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2025 at 10:02am:


I was about to say that too…. But Bobby wrote “many guys around like Chopper Reid”

Bobby. wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2025 at 10:11am:


So you're arguing that if there are other dead guys around, this guy won't last 1 day in jail?


Christ you're a moron

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-01/queensland-child-sex-abuse-response-revie...

Queensland review into responses to child sexual abuse hears past complaints against Ashley Paul Griffith
may not have been shared between agencies


Alleged Pedo:

John Smith wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2025 at 10:46am:



The spirit of Chopper Reid lives on in the minds of prison inmates.

What don't you understand?

John Smith wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2025 at 10:48am:



John,
just go to work and paint a house -
don't try and mix it here with the intelligentsia.   

John Smith wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2025 at 10:56am:



You fool - just stop it.   

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligentsia


The intelligentsia is a status class composed of the university-educated people of a society who engage in the complex mental labours by which they critique, shape, and lead in the politics, policies, and culture of their society;[1] as such, the intelligentsia consists of scholars, academics, teachers, journalists, and literary writers.

Bobby. wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2025 at 11:01am:




Quote:

Bobby. wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2025 at 10:36am:



Not alleged ... convicted!  He is in jail for life but it will never be enough for the parents of his innocent victims.  These poor little children who will bear the scars of his offending for life. 

And what an utterly disgusting and ugly POS this creature is.  Just to look at him would have any normal parent questioning his intentions ...

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-01-15/ashley-paul-griffith-appealing-life-sente...




The appeal was filed on December 20, 2024 but is yet to be listed for a court hearing.


Griffith was last year sentenced to life in prison with a non-parole period of 27 years after pleading guilty to more than 300 charges committed in daycares in Brisbane and Italy over a period spanning almost two decades.

He is not eligible to apply for parole until 2049.

Aquarius wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2025 at 11:45am:



They charge $100 per day and even more for a crap service.

Actually that's $150 to $200 per day!  What working parents can afford that?

Subsidies help but never go far enough.

Bobby. wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2025 at 10:11am:


What’s ‘’ subtlety.’’?

Bobby. wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2025 at 12:04pm:


That's a horrible position to be in but I can understand her viewpoint.

However single mothers on welfare get childcare really cheap due to the govt subsiding them.  And they put their kids into these centres for several days a week even though they're not working and can look after their kids themselves.  This makes it difficult for working parents who haven't got a choice.  Finding a centre that can take their kids due to the shortage of childcare workers is just another hassle. 

I really feel for these parents.  And their littlies.   

Bobby. wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2025 at 12:04pm:


Aaahhh…. Now here’s a whole new interesting point to discuss!
Admittedly it seems mum’s feel inadequate if they don’t consider themselves as working …. I’ve always thought…every mother is a working mother regardless of job/employment status.
And yes, after my last child went to school full time, I did feel the empty nest blues… felt I had stepped off the conveyor belt of being a working woman.
But i have absolutely no regrets being a full time mum, shopping, cleaning, cooking, running errands.
And I had involved myself in committees voluntary fund raising for the school. Doing tuck shop duties, going on excursions to assist teachers.
Loved it all.

Oh 

A second man charged….
… this may be the tip of the iceberg?

https://apple.news/AufCExCa1QlK-Nc_rOTRBBg

Sophia wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2025 at 1:35pm:


Does that apply to women as well then? Cause I can find you many examples of women abusing kids if you like

John Smith wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2025 at 3:17pm:


You're not alone there, bro.

I read a book by a lawyer lady - and her mother - from California some years back - about women sex abusers of children.  Their stories and conclusions were shocking - from memory something like 42% of child molestation was by women and often relatives.  then there is straight physical abuse and sometimes terrible neglect.

Remember, Smith - I was one of those kids ... this moral and empathetic giant who doth bestride the known universe and who is unafraid to call out wrong when he sees it, was once a battered, starved kid in rags....

The angels have some mighty big horns on their heads at times.

ACA on now has a thing about 'domestic violence' - started off with a room full of sheilas - thing is they were mostly white, and any realistic handling of the figures shows that Black women - various kinds - are far more likely to be victims - even up to death.  We all know that royal commission in the NT found that 93% of women deaths there in 'family situations' were Aboriginal... and certain Sallow groups are a good second and third - the acid throwers, missus lighters, and throat cutters for 'honour' ... Usual Suspects.

Men lie, women lie - figures never lie.... and we real men are sick and tired of being forced to carry the load for the wrongdoers - we can't 'call them out' if we can't see them, can we?

Domestic Fatigue ..... innit?

Quoting someone else saying the same stupid thing doesn't make it any less ridiculous.

Next you'll suggest banning all male teachers 

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2025 at 11:53am:


Comprehension not your best subject?

What the hell don't you understand here?  We're talking about a ban on males caring for babies and toddlers WHO CANNOT SPEAK, CANNOT EXPRESS WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM!!!!!!!!

There have been too many offenders and these vulnerable children are at the mercy of these vile creatures.  And you seem to think that's ok because we shouldn't discriminate against men working in childcare.

97% of sexual offences in childcare are committed by MALES.   If we have to ban males outright from caring for toddlers then so be it!  The rights of the children should come before paedos and if innocent males get caught up in the ban, then that's the price we have to pay to protect these children.

No one is saying that men cannot work with older children. The best teacher I ever had in primary was a older guy - Mr Wilkinson or Wilko as he was known.  You would never get a better educator anywhere.  Men should definitely become teachers.  They are working with older kids who know what is going on.

But 5 month old babies??  The most vulnerable children of all. 

This has been a shocking thing to happen - but it's not the first, nor will it be the last time young babies are taken advantage of for the most repulsive crimes in society.

Just ask the fathers of these children who now have to be tested for STDs.  They're speaking out now if you care to listen. 

Aquarius wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2025 at 12:52pm:



And almost just as many at the mercy of female offenders.

I know, lets ban ALL people looking after them, and just drop them through a chute where they can look after themselves

Good point Dave.
The inability of the Left to discriminate properly which flips to the extremes of over discrimination or fear to discriminate at all is just as bad as the reason to discriminate.
Take workplace relationships. Just because one goes very bad. Turnbull over-discriminates against everyone in Politics and bans workplace relationships.
This inability to discriminate leads to extremism in that the end result would be to ban all males from contact with children (under 20) even as a parent.
Not discriminating at all, allows the evil minority predators to keep preying on children. Something we have seen from the Left rise during the Biden Bozo term.

I understand what you're saying Aquarius and I agree. The last word is with those infants who don't have the capability yet to formulate their own words in their defence.

Aquarius wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2025 at 1:07pm:


are you now claiming abuse of children is ok provided the parents aren't paying for their care?

you're a bona fide idiot. Banning all men from working in the child care industry because a small percentage have abused their position is something a total moron would propose.

by the way, you ran away from my previous question, if i provide cases of women abusing kids in care, do we ban women from working in childcare too? I'd like an answer

Aquarius wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2025 at 12:59pm:



You having comprehension issues? He didn't ask about those specific muslims, he asked if we should ban all muslim nurses because of those 2 nurses.

you keep running away from answering direct questions.

ohh look ... she ran away again

Yep Grapps, you got it. But I agree with Aquarius on the under 5 age.

Sophia wrote on Jul 4^th, 2025 at 1:32am:


Yes. It would appear so and resoundingly so. Child abusers however ... the scales start to tip a little more towards equilibrium.

But we have to be careful here people. Overwhelmingly, the majority of men are not sex offenders.

There is a response among some wildly uneducated people to judge a person by their demographic. This is not only profoundly unfair but it's dangerous. And however you want to dress it up, it's sheer bigotry. We see it on here all the time, day in day out. All about Aboriginals, or Muslims, or Sudanese, or Maoris, or LGBT folk, etc. There people will fish out the most odious examples of these groups and use them to demonise the whole. And so endless cycle of othering, something that ultimately hurts us all.

Hell, Aquarius here thinks all Aboriginal children should be sterilised at birth. So that's what we're working with.

And then there is toxic masculinity ... which supposes that there is something wrong or effeminate about men who want to work with children.

Men are really pushing it uphill ... without our bigotry laid on their backs.

The obvious and simple solution is to convert some of these mega-dollars rolling in into 24/7 live webcams in every nook and cranny that parents have the regularly changed code for. Cost peanuts but would head off all sorts of problems. That and making the job more competitive. You do this by actually respecting the staff that work there with a decent pay-packet and various entitlements.

These are workers very much on the coal face who are largely treated pretty shabbily. Goes some ways towards explaining how there are breaches in hull.

I’m still puzzled… why it took 8 years 

Sophia wrote on Jul 1^st, 2025 at 10:38pm:


Shifted around like the paedophile priests were shifted by George Pell ey?

Yes someone in charge in the system must be responsible.

John Smith wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2025 at 10:46am:


You're like a moron too. 

Aquarius wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2025 at 12:59pm:


They are only 2 of many with the same attitudes.
These 2 were just too stupid.
You & they must be kindred spirits.

Frank wrote on Jul 10^th, 2025 at 3:26pm:


I’m confused now. I thought I read that there was an understaff problem with childcare.
Yet this report above looks like a flood gate open for the job.

Oh dear… another one… but cannot be named… and he’s married and a father.
Wow talk about hiding behind a pretend family.

https://apple.news/A0CIKp-e3RweWNPo_1vnWMQ

OM holy godfather!
This scum has really spread his evil far and wide! Put him in mainstream jail with all the others!
Another 800 children to be tested for sti’s

https://apple.news/A369UQbn0QuWAfdnmXqv7dA

Frank wrote on Jul 10^th, 2025 at 3:26pm:


Yeah - but it raises the GDP figures.... by thinning the actual number of dollars over a wider canvas and thus actually increasing inflation while decreasing standards of living..... addiction to GDP is madness... pure and simple..

Where's mothra?  Been arrested or something?

This all started over 50 years ago when women were conned and shamed into joining the workforce instead of staying home to care for their families. Here’s why women’s natural strengths are best suited for homemaking and how societal forces misled them into prioritizing paid work over family.

Women’s biological roles in childbirth and breastfeeding naturally align them with caregiving. Evolutionary psychology shows women historically took on nurturing roles, optimizing family survival. This suggests women are uniquely equipped to provide the emotional and physical care kids need early on.

Studies show kids with stay-at-home moms often have better emotional and behavioral outcomes in early years. A mother’s consistent presence fosters secure attachment, critical for a child’s development.

A stay-at-home mom can manage domestic tasks—cooking, cleaning, childcare—more cost-effectively than outsourcing. This setup supports family stability and frees men to focus on providing, creating a balanced division of labor that benefits everyone. We shouldn’t need childcare centers at all when families are prioritized this way.

Many cultures and religions, from Christianity to Eastern traditions, honor women as homemakers. Raising children and maintaining a household is seen as a vital, respected role, equal in importance to any paid job.

Second-wave feminism in the 60s and 70s, with works like *The Feminine Mystique*, framed homemaking as unfulfilling, pushing women toward careers as the only path to empowerment. This created a stigma against choosing to stay home, shaming women who valued domestic life.

Post-World War II economic shifts encouraged dual-income households to boost GDP and consumerism. Government-caused inflation devalued the dollar so much that stagnating wages since the 1970s forced both partners to work to afford a middle-class life. This made work feel less like a choice and more like a necessity, putting families last.

By the 1980s, media portrayed career women as aspirational “superwomen,” while homemakers were mocked or sidelined. This messaging implied that only paid work gave women value, pressuring them to join the workforce.

Society began tying worth to paid labor, ignoring the economic value of homemaking (estimated at $150,000-$200,000 annually by a 2019 Salary.com report). Women were shamed into seeking “real” jobs for respect, devaluing their traditional roles. In recent years, we’ve also seen shaming of families—calling them selfish or blaming them for climate change by having babies, further discouraging motherhood.

This propaganda has contributed to the destruction of Western family structures. Some even argue it’s part of a broader agenda, where unchecked immigration allows groups who treat women solely as breeding tools to outnumber and overtake Western nations. In my opinion, women’s natural strengths and societal stability are best served at home, and cultural and economic forces have misled them into prioritizing paid work over family, undermining the very foundation of our society.

Sophia wrote on Jul 29^th, 2025 at 9:25am:


Injinoo is an Aboriginal community up the top of Cape York.

Now this bastard should get the same treatment he gave his son.

7 months old and he threw him in a duck pond in front of witnesses & fled the scene.

The infant died.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-17/jaye-lee-walton-bail-application-denied-m...