Australian Politics Forum - USUKA, No Nuke Subs

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › Federal Politics › USUKA, No Nuke Subs

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 2 3

USUKA, No Nuke Subs (Read 772 times)

Marla Gold Member Offline Run for me, MAGA bunny. Posts: 14179 Colorado Gender:	Re: USUKA, No Nuke Subs Reply #30 - Jun 15^th, 2025 at 4:04am Leroy wrote on Jun 12^th, 2025 at 10:16am: WTF did you expect, if our politicians are going to talk about Trump the way they do of course he is going to screw you. Its called self harm. Yeah, stay stupid, Peeroy.
Back to top	All of us get lost in the darkness dreamers learn to steer by the stars IP Logged

Marla Gold Member Offline Run for me, MAGA bunny. Posts: 14179 Colorado Gender:	Re: AUKUS, No Nuke Subs Reply #31 - Jun 15^th, 2025 at 4:06am Bobby. wrote on Jun 13^th, 2025 at 9:13am: China is too powerful for us - they have the largest navy in the world - no matter how much we spend we could never defend ourselves without help from the USA and perhaps the UK too. Told you, Blooby. Might be wise to start learning how to speak Chinese.
Back to top	All of us get lost in the darkness dreamers learn to steer by the stars IP Logged

Sir Eoin O Fada

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2804
New England, NSW
Gender: male

Re: USUKA, No Nuke Subs
Reply #32 - Jun 15^th, 2025 at 9:16am

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 14^th, 2025 at 9:39pm:

Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Jun 14^th, 2025 at 7:53pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 14^th, 2025 at 5:55pm:

Labor majority government wrote on Jun 14^th, 2025 at 5:40pm:

Hopefully they cancel it , can't believe Labor backed scomos brainfart

Here's a question - what alternative was there? Please tell us what alternative was there have had sufficient range and ability to match the proposed atomic powered submarine? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

There you go again,Brian, nobody calls the Steam submarines ‘Atomic’ anymore, the buzz word for these conventionally powered steam boats is ‘Nuclear’.

In answer to your question, try Gotland-class submarine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotland-class_submarine

The Gotland Class is registered to have a range of 1,700 nautical miles. Nuclear submarines have an unlimited range. They do not compare all that well, Eugene. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

The range of the Stirling engined subs is limited by the amount of compressed oxygen that they can carry and that limits their range, however that is a design choice and as we have no need for unlimited range then a Sterling engined sub can do what we need and SILENTLY unlike the noisy steam boats.

Self defence is a right.

IP Logged

Sir Eoin O Fada Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2804 New England, NSW Gender:	Re: USUKA, No Nuke Subs Reply #33 - Jun 16^th, 2025 at 10:22am Pity that Bill Shorten isn’t PM, then we could call him “Steam Boat Bill”.
Back to top	Self defence is a right. IP Logged

Pages: 1 2 3

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Forum

‹ Board

Top of this page