https://edition.cnn.com/2025/07/29/politics/maxwell-conditions-congressional-tes...




Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell has offered to testify before Congress, but with major conditions, including immunity, according to a list of her demands sent to the House Oversight Committee by her attorneys.

House Oversight Chair James Comer subpoenaed Maxwell to testify next month. In a new letter sent to Comer Tuesday, Maxwell’s attorneys said they initially decided to invoke her Fifth Amendment rights, but then offered to cooperate with Congress “if a fair and safe path forward can be established.”

Her attorneys noted Maxwell is currently appealing her conviction to the Supreme Court and argued that “any testimony she provides now could compromise her constitutional rights, prejudice her legal claims, and potentially taint a future jury pool.”

“Compounding these concerns are public comments from members of Congress that appear to have prejudged Ms. Maxwell’s credibility without even listening to what she has to say or evaluating the extensive documentation that corroborates it,” the letter states.

aquascoot wrote on Jul 30^th, 2025 at 6:34am:



no, it was because Epstein kept stealing the 'Ms America' girls he had working at his resorts

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/POUEBPovzZo


you need to stop pretending you have a clue

aquascoot wrote on Jul 29^th, 2025 at 6:34pm:


It's disgusting you're still trying to defend the child rapists...

Let's not pretend this post is some revelatory expose. It's little more than a disingenuous attempt to recast a known child sex trafficker as a misunderstood intelligence asset and, in doing so, launder the reputations of the powerful men, including Trump, who were entangled in his orbit.

At best, this is a morally bankrupt exercise in misdirection. At worst, it's an apologia for paedophiles masquerading as analysis. You don't get to parade a list of celebrities, scientists, and billionaires as if you're uncovering some grand geopolitical plot, then conveniently downplay the core issue: the systemic rape and trafficking of underage girls.

Let's walk through the real problem here, not your amateur speculation about Mossad and CIA strings, but your casual absolution of predators.

Trump was not a victim of espionage. He was a long-time associate of Epstein, praised him openly, and partied with him repeatedly. He appointed Alex Acosta, the very man who gave Epstein his sweetheart deal. That is not incidental, it's complicity.

You throw out names like Musk, Dawkins, and Hawking, as though proximity equates to guilt, only to declare, "Doubtful they wanted to have sex with teenagers." Then, moments later, you shrug off the idea that Trump, Clinton and others "probably did." Which is it? Is this about espionage or is this about excusing the rape of trafficked minors when your political idols are involved?

You assert this was a "honeypot" operation, which may have some truth. But honeypots only work when people are willing to engage in criminal acts. You're not describing victims, you're describing men who couldn't resist the opportunity to abuse vulnerable girls, and then got caught.

Your willingness to describe Epstein's crimes in euphemistic terms, "befriending homeless girls", is as sickening as it is revealing. He didn't befriend anyone. He exploited, raped, and trafficked children. If you can't say that plainly, it's because you're trying to soften the reality to protect the people you admire.

This entire post reads like the desperate rationalisations of someone who knows their side is implicated in one of the ugliest scandals of our time, and would rather vomit out pseudo-intellectual noise than confront the possibility that they are defending predators.

Defending Peadophiles!

If you think this is a game of political gotchas or intelligence intrigue, let me remind you: this isn't about foreign policy or espionage, it's about children. Children who were raped. Children who were trafficked. And powerful men, including Trump, who are credibly accused of participating or enabling it.

You don't get to handwave that away with "we'll never know" or "both sides are bad". That's not analysis, it's cowardice.

And the fact that you're more concerned with rehabilitating the image of men who may have raped trafficked minors than seeking justice for the victims tells us everything we need to know about your character.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 30^th, 2025 at 9:43am:



Are you saying/thinking that Maxwell procured teenagers for only two people, Epstein and Trump?

Why didnt this come out in her trial which, presumably had ful access to the Epstein files, and which found that she only procured them for Epstein.

Please explain.

The UK's Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton are among high-profile figures named in US court papers detailing connections of late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The newly released records form part of a case against Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's girlfriend who has been jailed for helping him abuse girls.

But the documents so far unveil no major new allegations about Epstein nor revelations about his associates.

Prince Andrew is accused of groping a woman, which he denies.

Other names in the documents include singer Michael Jackson and magician David Copperfield, though no wrongdoing is alleged.

Mr Clinton appears in a number of the documents. The former US president has acknowledged being a former associate of Epstein but has strongly denied he had any knowledge of his crimes.

The first files from the much-hyped trove - covering about 900 pages - were released on Wednesday, after an order by New York Judge Loretta Preska, who acknowledged many of those named had already been identified by the media or in Maxwell's criminal trial.


BBC, January 2024



Unsealed court documents reveal names of men allegedly linked to Jeffrey Epstein
So these documents, compiled as part of a civil case, show that Epstein, a registered sex offender, continued to move for years in elite circles, associating with people like Prince Andrew, you know, the prominent attorney Alan Dershowitz. The musician Michael Jackson is named here, a former U.S. senator from Maine believed to be George Mitchell, also former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, and, as you mentioned, Donald Trump and also former Vice President Al Gore. Former President Bill Clinton's name comes up frequently in these documents. And, again, being named here doesn't reflect wrongdoing. Most of these people, including Clinton, have said they had no awareness of Epstein's alleged crimes. But the documents also include repeated claims that these social gatherings of powerful men included young women, some of them minors, arranged by Epstein and by his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell, of course, is now serving a 20-year prison sentence on federal sex trafficking charges linked to her work for Epstein.
PBS January 2024


Attorney General Pamela Bondi Releases First Phase of Declassified Epstein Files
Thursday, February 27, 2025
For Immediate Release - Office of Public Affairs
Today, Attorney General Pamela Bondi, in conjunction with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), declassified and publicly released files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his sexual exploitation of over 250 underage girls at his homes in New York and Florida, among other locations. The first phase of declassified files largely contains documents that have been previously leaked but never released in a formal capacity by the U.S. Government.

Frank wrote on Jul 30^th, 2025 at 10:05am:


And despite the sworn testimony of victims who have implicated Trump, he was the only one out of all these people who didn't sexually abuse children with Epstein?

You're not helping your case...

Stop defending peadophiles.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 30^th, 2025 at 10:08am:

You are (still, as ever) out of your mind with deranged self-rigteous indignation, teapot. And you now saying that ALL the people named are pedos?

Frank wrote on Jul 30^th, 2025 at 10:20am:


Are you saying they're not, and therefore Trump is not?