I've been warning you all for many years -

first they start out with cultural Marxism and
now it's elevated to full blown Marxism on the agenda.

New land taxes are also a way that you pay rent to use your own land -
pure communism.

Grappler Racist Filth wrote on Jun 8^th, 2025 at 8:22pm:



They are a 5th column of communist insurgents right here amongst us.

Grappler Racist Filth wrote on Jun 8^th, 2025 at 8:32pm:



Be prepared - the Greens now have the balance of power in the Federal Senate too.

Aussies wanted communism.

https://hansardsearch.parliament.sa.gov.au/daily/uh/2025-06-04/62


Bills



Second Reading

Adjourned debate on second reading.

(Continued from 19 October 2022.)

The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (20:09): I rise to place on the record some remarks in relation to this bill. It will come as little surprise, I think, that the Liberal Party will not be supporting this bill. I have not checked the record, but I am assuming that when it has been brought to this chamber in the past by the Hon. Mark Parnell, the Liberal Party did not support it then for similar reasons, which I will outline now.

This bill allows the designated entity, as prescribed in this bill, to take temporary control of privately owned, vacant, underutilised land for public purposes, notably for emergency and portable housing. Under the bill, landowners who are deemed unable or unwilling to develop their land can be subject to statutory leasing by the state or the council, depending on where, without their consent or compensation. The bill was inspired, I am advised, by a similar Victorian program—and Victorian programs or ideas should always be considered with caution. The socialist state of Victoria has taken a number of measures which have seen people, who would otherwise be able to build and supply housing, flee the market because of suggestions such as these.

While we appreciate that there is a significant need for housing, we certainly do not think that this is a good approach. Ninety-seven per cent—I think is the figure that industry uses—of housing is built by the private sector, so I think we need to bear that in mind and not make them some sort of bogey in this debate. If we do not make things easier for the private sector, they are not going to be able to build.

This bill effectively allows for occupation of private land without the consent of the landowner or payment of rent for it either, which is a fundamental breach of property rights that have operated in this state since settlement. It sets a precedent that would undermine confidence in secure land ownership, and that is very significant indeed. I think there would be a number of people who might otherwise operate in South Australia who would see that as a sovereign risk. We have concerns about key terms in this bill, such as 'public purpose' and 'underutilised land', and whether there is any appeal mechanism that would allow landowners to prevail against the designated entity's decisions. There is also a concern about politicisation.

The bill proposes an insertion into the Planning, Development and Infrastructure Act of new section 243A, subsection (9) of which contains the definition of 'designated entity':

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 8^th, 2025 at 9:03pm:


No.

Are you a Cultural Marxist?

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1660808671/1845#1848

Ai's explanation :

The term "Cultural Marxist" is a controversial label often used in political and academic debates, but its meaning varies depending on who is using it. Here’s a breakdown of its different interpretations:

1. Academic & Critical Theory Perspective
Cultural Marxism refers to a branch of Marxist theory that analyzes culture, ideology, and media rather than focusing solely on economics.

It emerged from the Frankfurt School (1920s–30s), a group of German intellectuals (e.g., Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Herbert Marcuse) who studied how culture and mass media reinforce capitalist domination.

Later thinkers like Antonio Gramsci (with his concept of "cultural hegemony") and figures in critical theory expanded on these ideas, examining how power operates through institutions like education, art, and entertainment.

2. Right-Wing Conspiracy Theory
In far-right and conservative circles, "Cultural Marxism" is often used as a pejorative term to describe a supposed leftist plot to undermine Western values.

This conspiracy theory claims that Marxist intellectuals (particularly the Frankfurt School) deliberately promoted progressive ideas—feminism, multiculturalism, LGBTQ+ rights, political correctness—to destroy traditional culture.

This narrative is popular among white nationalists, reactionaries, and some conservative commentators (e.g., Jordan Peterson, Andrew Breitbart).

3. Misuse & Controversy
Scholars reject the conspiracy version, noting that the Frankfurt School criticized both capitalism and Soviet communism, and had no organized agenda to "destroy the West."

The term is sometimes used as a dog whistle to attack social justice movements, equating progressive activism with a secret Marxist takeover.

Critics argue it’s a modern rebranding of older antisemitic tropes (e.g., "Cultural Bolshevism," a Nazi propaganda term).
If used accurately, "Cultural Marxism" refers to Marxist-inspired cultural critique. However, in political rhetoric, it often functions as a smear against progressive movements. Be cautious of context when encountering the term.


Oh I see, you are attempting to deflect away from you using a nazi site, to push a false agenda.

Got it. You are tricky and dangerous.

No need to go hunting under the bed for any 'Neo-Nazis' - who I described last week (now) as being something of a joke in Australia - we have REAL New Nazis in our Parliaments  and in positions of power in government departments and courts and houses of learning .... they are called 'progressives' .... but their agenda is one of absolute control.... so they are Progressive New Nazis ...