ProudKangaroo wrote on May 28
th, 2025 at 9:41am:
Baronvonrort wrote on May 27
th, 2025 at 10:14pm:
Bobby. wrote on May 27
th, 2025 at 8:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 27
th, 2025 at 8:08pm:
Bobby. wrote on May 27
th, 2025 at 6:37pm:
What do you have to do to get charged with terrorism these days?
Use violence in an attempt to advance a political, religious, or ideological cause .
The 53 year-old white guy who allegedly did this didn't do it for political or religious reasons.
Except that he looks about 25 to 30 and he's tinted:
Evidence:
https://x.com/TRobinsonNewEra/status/1927078397101957372 Was this the 53 year old white guy they arrested for attacking the tinted younger suspect?
https://x.com/TBifford/status/1927094295762190557Suspect was in Police Van MP33 crowd were chanting kill him, police were protecting the suspect.
They haven't released name of the driver.
So stop speculating. Have you learned nothing from the Southport Stabbing and the deliberate disinformation spread about that?
Disinformation championed at the time by none other than Tommy Robinson, who went on to publicise and amplify the protests that followed, which were fueled by his deliberate disinformation about the attacker's identity that he helped spread.
Protests that led to violent riots, mosque attacks, injuries to police, a surge in anti-Muslim hate crimes, and widespread unrest, prompting arrests, parliamentary inquiries, and scrutiny of far-right figures and social media platforms for spreading disinformation.
And guess who is amplifying more disinformation this time, about the identity of the driver?
Tommy fu
cking
Robinson again...
You mouth breathing dickheads are so easily manilulated it's not funny.
“You absolute hypocrites. A man gets arrested and within minutes you’re on air and online shouting ’53 year old White British man’ like it’s a public health warning. Not just a man. Not just a suspect. Not even “a Brit.” A white British man,” wrote one person in response to a Sky News report highlighting the description.
“Race front and centre as if it’s the real story. When the attacker’s not White, where’s the same energy? Where’s the description? Where’s the racial ID blasted out before the facts are in? Oh that’s right you bury it.”
“Remember when Merseyside Police described the Southport attacker as a Welsh Christian schoolboy, inferring that he was WHITE and BRITISH? They can’t get it out quick enough that the Liverpool attacker is actually WHITE and BRITISH. Disgusting,” read another popular post.
“This is horrendous. But why do the BBC/police immediately state ‘White British man’? Just minutes after the incident? Does anyone recall them ever stating ‘Asian man’ or ‘black man’ in similar circumstances? Thought not,”
said TalkTV presenter Russell Quirk.