Australian Politics Forum - Ben loses appeal

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Ben loses appeal - costs $35 million so far
Reply #60 - May 19^th, 2025 at 2:50pm

lee wrote on May 19^th, 2025 at 11:09am:

John Smith wrote on May 18^th, 2025 at 8:03pm:

well who do you think was going to pillar him?

There are even forum members here who pilloried Roberts-Smith, once it was made public. And you believe it wouldn't happen again? You really are thick. Roll Eyes

If you were worried about forum members here pilloring him on here, why did you announce it on this forum?? Cheesy

Dumb as dogsh1t you are

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20221 Gender:	Re: Ben loses appeal - costs $35 million so far Reply #61 - May 19^th, 2025 at 4:00pm John Smith wrote on May 19^th, 2025 at 2:50pm: If you were worried about forum members here pilloring him on here, why did you announce it on this forum?? They have already pilloried Roberts-Smith dumbarse. What's to stop then doing it against another? Geez you are stupid.
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39726 Gender:	Re: Ben loses appeal - costs $35 million so far Reply #62 - May 19^th, 2025 at 4:36pm Some post stuff about why I have largely withdrawn from debate here at OzPol. The comments from Lee and Gnads are very good examples why. Just pointless.
Back to top	IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20221 Gender:	Re: Ben loses appeal - costs $35 million so far Reply #63 - May 19^th, 2025 at 4:53pm And Aussie knows because most of his posts are pointless.
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Ben loses appeal - costs $35 million so far
Reply #64 - May 19^th, 2025 at 5:04pm

Gnads wrote on May 19^th, 2025 at 12:55pm:

John Smith wrote on May 17^th, 2025 at 9:57am:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 9:15pm:

John Smith wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 8:48pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 8:45pm:

John Smith wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 8:32pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 5:49pm:

Criminalizing the killing of the enemy by soldiers w

you mean killing unarmed people who have their arms tied behind their backs

they're soldiers, not executioners.

Enemy.

We sent them to kill the enemy.
They did. Good.

only in your head. They were sent to defeat the enemy, not kill them. There's a difference

No there isn't.

the fact that war crimes tribunals even exist proves just what a moron you are

When did they come into existence?

There was a 1 off in 1945 with the Nuremburg Trials for the Nazis who gassed & murdered 6 million Jewish civilians - fairly obvious.

Then the UN established the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in 1993.

In 1994 the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). Where nearly 1 million people were either murdered, bashed/attacked & raped.

The supposedly independent International Criminal Court wasn't established until 2002.

They usually don't deal with 1 soldier over 1 alleged incident.

Irrelevant when it was started.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Ben loses appeal - costs $35 million so far
Reply #65 - May 19^th, 2025 at 5:06pm

lee wrote on May 19^th, 2025 at 4:00pm:

John Smith wrote on May 19^th, 2025 at 2:50pm:

If you were worried about forum members here pilloring him on here, why did you announce it on this forum??

They have already pilloried Roberts-Smith dumbarse. What's to stop then doing it against another? Geez you are stupid.

You already posted on ozpol that there was another person involved then you cry you don't want to report it to the authorities because members of ozpol might pillar him

are you really that stupid? Cheesy

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20221
Gender: male

Re: Ben loses appeal - costs $35 million so far
Reply #66 - May 19^th, 2025 at 5:09pm

John Smith wrote on May 19^th, 2025 at 5:06pm:

You already posted on ozpol that there was another person involved then you cry you don't want to report it to the authorities because members of ozpol might pillar him

He hasn't been named for the maroons like you to pillory him. Grin

Note: Not pillar. You pillock. Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Ben loses appeal - costs $35 million so far
Reply #67 - May 19^th, 2025 at 6:05pm

lee wrote on May 19^th, 2025 at 5:09pm:

John Smith wrote on May 19^th, 2025 at 5:06pm:

You already posted on ozpol that there was another person involved then you cry you don't want to report it to the authorities because members of ozpol might pillar him

He hasn't been named for the maroons like you to pillory him. Grin

Note: Not pillar. You pillock. Wink

do you actually believe the authorities didn't chase him, because they were worried ozpolians might pillar him? Grin

you make no sense you moron

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33211
Gender: male

Re: Ben loses appeal - costs $35 million so far
Reply #68 - May 20^th, 2025 at 12:23pm

chimera wrote on May 19^th, 2025 at 1:50pm:

https://www.ag.gov.au/national-security/australias-counter-terrorism-laws

Anti terror laws are applied to convict law-breakers such as:
1) Australian Army
2) Gnads.
This is because of extremist terrorists knocking off the World Trade Center before the Australians had a go at it.

Dipstick

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Gnads Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 33211 Gender:	Re: Ben loses appeal - costs $35 million so far Reply #69 - May 20^th, 2025 at 12:28pm Aussie wrote on May 19^th, 2025 at 4:36pm: Some post stuff about why I have largely withdrawn from debate here at OzPol. The comments from Lee and Gnads are very good examples why. Just pointless. I asked you what was your excuse... you go all coy & boohoo. A cup of cement powder is cheap.
Back to top	"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 118181
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Ben loses appeal - costs $35 million so far
Reply #70 - May 20^th, 2025 at 12:40pm

lee wrote on May 19^th, 2025 at 5:09pm:

John Smith wrote on May 19^th, 2025 at 5:06pm:

You already posted on ozpol that there was another person involved then you cry you don't want to report it to the authorities because members of ozpol might pillar him

He hasn't been named for the maroons like you to pillory him. Grin

Note: Not pillar. You pillock. Wink

John left school when he was 15. Embarrassed

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39726
Gender: male

Re: Ben loses appeal - costs $35 million so far
Reply #71 - May 20^th, 2025 at 1:26pm

Gnads wrote on May 20^th, 2025 at 12:28pm:

Aussie wrote on May 19^th, 2025 at 4:36pm:

Some post stuff about why I have largely withdrawn from debate here at OzPol. The comments from Lee and Gnads are very good examples why.

Just pointless.

I asked you what was your excuse... you go all coy & boohoo.

A cup of cement powder is cheap.

You tried to get attention with an expression used in the kindergarten sand pits, and you got the response it therefore deserved.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33211
Gender: male

Re: Ben loses appeal - costs $35 million so far
Reply #72 - May 20^th, 2025 at 1:30pm

Aussie wrote on May 20^th, 2025 at 1:26pm:

Gnads wrote on May 20^th, 2025 at 12:28pm:

Aussie wrote on May 19^th, 2025 at 4:36pm:

Some post stuff about why I have largely withdrawn from debate here at OzPol. The comments from Lee and Gnads are very good examples why.

Just pointless.

I asked you what was your excuse... you go all coy & boohoo.

A cup of cement powder is cheap.

You tried to get attention with an expression used in the kindergarten sand pits, and you got the response it therefore deserved.

Really? attention that? Grin

... maybe it went over your head?

I thought you'd have got my drift. Roll Eyes

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20221 Gender:	Re: Ben loses appeal - costs $35 million so far Reply #73 - May 20^th, 2025 at 1:41pm John Smith wrote on May 19^th, 2025 at 6:05pm: do you actually believe the authorities didn't chase him, because they were worried ozpolians might pillar him? No petal. He was the one with the lower profile. They wanted big boots. But it was the rabid here that would have pilloried.
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Ben loses appeal - costs $35 million so far Reply #74 - May 20^th, 2025 at 7:46pm lee wrote on May 20^th, 2025 at 1:41pm: John Smith wrote on May 19^th, 2025 at 6:05pm: do you actually believe the authorities didn't chase him, because they were worried ozpolians might pillar him? No petal. then why did you say that was why you wouldn't report him to the authorities?
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged