chimera wrote on May 16
th, 2025 at 7:51am:
The Arctic is 14mill sq kms. A 55sq km area is appropriate for a total area trend.
A 55 sq km is the size of ONE 0.5x0.5 grid. Grid size area increases as you get further away from the poles. If they were all one area it would take over 254,000 grid cells, each with its own error bars.
chimera wrote on May 16
th, 2025 at 7:51am:
Compared to speculation, the smoothed data is correct for the basic q.: is the total area or volume changing significantly?
So you say there are no error bars in their calculations. R-i-i-ght.

"As 1 example year, we find that in 2015 the average observational uncertainties of the SIA are 306 000 km2 for daily estimates, 275 000 km2 for weekly estimates, and 164 000 km2 for monthly estimates. "
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/2473/2024/BTW - Multiple measurements do NOT decrease uncertainty. So they are wrong about that.
chimera wrote on May 16
th, 2025 at 8:15am:
ests show the classification accuracy of this method typically exceeds 96 %'.
So let's see only 4% wrong. How much is 4% you ask? Only 560,000 sq km. Good enough for government work.
chimera wrote on May 16
th, 2025 at 12:41pm:
'Ship voyages in the Arctic have increased significantly due to declining sea ice, opening up new routes and making the region more accessible to ships. From 2013 to 2023, the number of unique ships operating in the Arctic Polar Code area increased by 37%, and the distance they sailed increased by 111%'.
Science uses thermometers and ship-owners use dollars.
And they STILL use ice breakers. Russia is building bigger and stronger, why is that? Ship owners build ice breakers. Could it be Sea Ice also hasoscillations, you know like AMO and most things, or is it all Climate Change?