Home Articles Forum Wiki Poll Garden Contact

 
 
 
  
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
 
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

  Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › Aboriginal Affairs › The VOICE 2.0…
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
The VOICE 2.0… (Read 2842 times)
SerialBrain9
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3473
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #30 - May 2nd, 2025 at 6:28pm  
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:44pm:
"Speaking to The Australian in April, Prof Langton said if the Voice failed non-Indigenous Australians would feel too ashamed to ask traditional owners to do a Welcome to Country.

'How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference?' she said.

'If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.'"

Well - nobody's asking.... so there's no need for her to say no, ay?


greggy and Brian had 2 options…

Run away like little girls (which they do regularly)

Or try and stay and twist things into something they are NOT…

Looks like they chose the latter in this case…

Pathetic Losers…  Grin
Back to top
 
From a Place You Will Not See, Comes a Sound You Will Not Hear. .  ▄︻デ╦═一━
………..
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57350
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #31 - May 2nd, 2025 at 6:33pm  
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:27pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:09pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…



Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?


Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fig...

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  Grin Grin


That doesn't say: "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…"

You must have highlighted the wrong bit.


Both you and Bbwiyawn are sly idiots, liars and ****wits.

You put Serial's words between quotation marks and then moronically pretend he was quoting an Aborigines verbatim. He wasn't. He conveyed the meaning of what Langdon said, whose actual words I quilted.

Now **** off, both of you, lying bozos.


Why are we "lying", Soren?  All I have asked is an accurate quote that reflects what CerealBrain9 proclaimed.  How is that, "lying"?  The only people who seem upset are those who want to believe what ever they want about Indigenous Australians.  Does that describe you, Soren?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

I gave you the accurate quote, incomprehending cvvnt.
**** off, moron.
Back to top
 
Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 46311
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #32 - May 2nd, 2025 at 6:36pm  
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:28pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:44pm:
"Speaking to The Australian in April, Prof Langton said if the Voice failed non-Indigenous Australians would feel too ashamed to ask traditional owners to do a Welcome to Country.

'How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference?' she said.

'If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.'"

Well - nobody's asking.... so there's no need for her to say no, ay?


greggy and Brian had 2 options…

Run away like little girls (which they do regularly)

Or try and stay and twist things into something they are NOT…

Looks like they chose the latter in this case…

Pathetic Losers…  Grin


Oh, dearie, dearie, me, CerealBrain9 you really need to work on your insulting technique.  That was utterly pathetic, you really need to work on that.  You seem to have posted at the near same time I did.  I not have run away, I am here.  You weren't terribly accurate in your quote, either, now were you?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 2nd, 2025 at 6:42pm by Brian Ross »  
It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 46311
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #33 - May 2nd, 2025 at 6:42pm  
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:33pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:27pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:09pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…



Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?


Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fig...

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  Grin Grin


That doesn't say: "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…"

You must have highlighted the wrong bit.


Both you and Bbwiyawn are sly idiots, liars and ****wits.

You put Serial's words between quotation marks and then moronically pretend he was quoting an Aborigines verbatim. He wasn't. He conveyed the meaning of what Langdon said, whose actual words I quilted.

Now **** off, both of you, lying bozos.


Why are we "lying", Soren?  All I have asked is an accurate quote that reflects what CerealBrain9 proclaimed.  How is that, "lying"?  The only people who seem upset are those who want to believe what ever they want about Indigenous Australians.  Does that describe you, Soren?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

I gave you the accurate quote, incomprehending cvvnt.
**** off, moron.


You claimed it was accurate but your quote conveyed very accurately what Marcia Langton said, which wasn't what CerealBrain9 said.  Why do you claim the reverse all the time, Soren?  What was your PhD thesis like with these inaccurate quotes?  I wonder about you and your claims.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57350
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #34 - May 2nd, 2025 at 6:46pm  
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:36pm:
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:28pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:44pm:
"Speaking to The Australian in April, Prof Langton said if the Voice failed non-Indigenous Australians would feel too ashamed to ask traditional owners to do a Welcome to Country.

'How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference?' she said.

'If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.'"

Well - nobody's asking.... so there's no need for her to say no, ay?


greggy and Brian had 2 options…

Run away like little girls (which they do regularly)

Or try and stay and twist things into something they are NOT…

Looks like they chose the latter in this case…

Pathetic Losers…  Grin


Oh, dearie, dearie, me, CerealBrain9 you really need to work on your insulting technique.  That was utterly pathetic, you really need to work on that.  You seem to have posted at the near same time I did.  I not have run away, I am here.  You weren't terribly accurate in your quote, either, now were you?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

You are lying, nappy shitter.
Back to top
 
Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 46311
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #35 - May 2nd, 2025 at 6:57pm  
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:46pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:36pm:
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:28pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:44pm:
"Speaking to The Australian in April, Prof Langton said if the Voice failed non-Indigenous Australians would feel too ashamed to ask traditional owners to do a Welcome to Country.

'How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference?' she said.

'If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.'"

Well - nobody's asking.... so there's no need for her to say no, ay?


greggy and Brian had 2 options…

Run away like little girls (which they do regularly)

Or try and stay and twist things into something they are NOT…

Looks like they chose the latter in this case…

Pathetic Losers…  Grin


Oh, dearie, dearie, me, CerealBrain9 you really need to work on your insulting technique.  That was utterly pathetic, you really need to work on that.  You seem to have posted at the near same time I did.  I not have run away, I am here.  You weren't terribly accurate in your quote, either, now were you?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

You are lying, nappy shitter.


Why?  Because I ask for accuracy rather than approximation?  Just because you want to believe whatever that is insulting about Indigenous Australians is indicative of how you regard people different to yourself.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 90008
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #36 - May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00pm  
What's most insulting about Aborigines is the way many of them persist in behaving.
Back to top
 
“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57350
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #37 - May 2nd, 2025 at 8:06pm  
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:57pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:46pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:36pm:
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:28pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:44pm:
"Speaking to The Australian in April, Prof Langton said if the Voice failed non-Indigenous Australians would feel too ashamed to ask traditional owners to do a Welcome to Country.

'How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference?' she said.

'If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.'"

Well - nobody's asking.... so there's no need for her to say no, ay?


greggy and Brian had 2 options…

Run away like little girls (which they do regularly)

Or try and stay and twist things into something they are NOT…

Looks like they chose the latter in this case…

Pathetic Losers…  Grin


Oh, dearie, dearie, me, CerealBrain9 you really need to work on your insulting technique.  That was utterly pathetic, you really need to work on that.  You seem to have posted at the near same time I did.  I not have run away, I am here.  You weren't terribly accurate in your quote, either, now were you?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

You are lying, nappy shitter.


Why?  Because I ask for accuracy rather than approximation?  Just because you want to believe whatever that is insulting about Indigenous Australians is indicative of how you regard people different to yourself.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Here's a challenge you will scuttle away from, nappy shitter:

What do you think Langton, the author of a landmark report on the Voice,  said and meant  here:

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake. “I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
Back to top
 
Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 46311
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #38 - May 2nd, 2025 at 10:22pm  
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 8:06pm:
Here's a challenge you will scuttle away from, nappy shitter:

What do you think Langton, the author of a landmark report on the Voice,  said and meant  here:

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake. “I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”


Another non-sequitur, Soren?  What Marcia Langton said in the Murdock rag is not what we were discussing.  We were discussing CerealBrain9's claims about what Indigenous Australians (note the use of the plural) claimed to have said.  Stick to the topic and stop trying to change it every post.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 20476
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #39 - May 2nd, 2025 at 11:36pm  
.
Back to top
 
Promises_002.png (206 KB | 12 )
Promises_002.png
Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Eoin O Fada
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3614
New England, NSW
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #40 - May 3rd, 2025 at 9:23am  
Baronvonrort wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:36pm:
.

If only.
Back to top
 
Self defence is a right.
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33208
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #41 - May 3rd, 2025 at 9:25am  
Baronvonrort wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:36pm:
.



Another white blackfella activist taking backhanders from the resource industry.  Roll Eyes

Sour nasty racist bint she is.
Back to top
 
"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #42 - May 3rd, 2025 at 9:47am  
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 3:33pm:
Soren, how about you prove you have a PhD

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

unless 'PhD' stands for 'Pharken dickhead', I think he's going to struggle with that one
Back to top
 
Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21977
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #43 - May 4th, 2025 at 7:14am  
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00pm:
What's most insulting about Aborigines is the way many of them persist in behaving.


I think the same about racists, maybe 10% of them are worth saving.

Since Wong floated the idea of the Voice and Labor was voted back in off that, I guess the country supports it again?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Boris
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4443
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #44 - May 4th, 2025 at 8:59am  
Behaviour

First Nations children represented 13% of all child homicide victims.

Counting missing First Nations women and children was equally problematic, somewhat owing to some jurisdictions not recording Indigenous status in their figures.


Despite the flawed data, the Senate inquiry heard 20% of missing women in Australia are Aboriginal women. The report found First Nations children and youth are over-represented in the out-of-home care system (approximately one in 18) and are

markedly overrepresented in reports of missing children. These children make up 53% of missing children reports.

Not only are First Nations women and children more likely to go missing, they are less likely to be found.

The inquiry also heard the problematic nature of the language of “missing” as being passive, and somehow suggestive that people go deliberately missing. We agree with Amy McQuire’s argument that these First Nations women and children are not missing – but disappeared.

https://theconversation.com/the-report-on-murdered-and-missing-indigenous-women-...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
 
 

  « Forum ‹ Board Top of this page

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge