Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print
The VOICE 2.0… (Read 2847 times)
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 46311
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #15 - May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm
 
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…



Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?


Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fig...

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #16 - May 2nd, 2025 at 1:28pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…



Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?




the voices in his head

the same place he gets all his other news Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #17 - May 2nd, 2025 at 1:31pm
 
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…



Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?


Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fig...



temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition




Grin Grin Grin

English is not your forte is it Agatha
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 57357
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #18 - May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…



Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?


Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fig...

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  Grin Grin
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 90009
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #19 - May 2nd, 2025 at 2:05pm
 
Marcia Langton - a 'professor' of some kind of identifying Aboriginal artefacts from some pokey little college in Mau Mau Country, way out on some dusty peninsula way up north there and of which nobody has ever heard - is an 'academic'?

Over-rated, over-indulged, over-stated, overpaid and over here... what a laugh.

Aboriginal Participation in simple class award professor.

Let's make Brian a Professor of identifying times to tsk, tsk.... step forward, Professor Brian!!  We don't always agree with your work and its essential simplicity, but we do see and value its input!!

Professor John Smith - for his long and arduous work in  identifying occasions to use lambast and hyperbole instead of reason... Professor Smith has opened up new frontiers of human knowledge....

Professor mothra - for adding to human knowledge by identifying opportunities to sail in with ad homs and an utter lack of supporting evidence for views, thus creating a new form of discussion..

Professor Phil from Perth - for developing the art of name-calling and personal insult to the highest degree of uncivilised behaviour, while retaining and extending the properties and merits of both Professor Smith and Professor mothra...

Professor Sad Kanga - for relentless dedication to personal put-down and ascension to the lofty heights of moral and intellectual superiority in his own lunch-time....

Professor dividie  - in acknowledgement of his uncanny ability to turn around and around like a dog chasing its tail, building an edifice of his Reason piece by piece into a house of cards that has withstood all attempts to reduce it to reason...

Step forward - all you New Professors...  Freediver's new OzPol University welcomes you all ...

Oh - and Professor Grappler for his dedicated work in developing being a bastard born and bred to the lofty heights of total superiority over all contenders... ya coulda bin a contender, but nothin' more, chumps.....  the Old Master has you by the hearts, minds and balls..

...


Back to top
« Last Edit: May 2nd, 2025 at 2:16pm by Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 46311
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #20 - May 2nd, 2025 at 3:33pm
 
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…



Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?


Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fig...

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  Grin Grin


I read, "If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no." which is not, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…" which is what CerealBrain9 claimed was said.  Now, rather than be an ignoramus and claim something says something it doesn't, Soren, how about you prove you have a PhD and show us where it was claimed, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…" or is English a too hard a language for you to understand, Dane?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 57357
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #21 - May 2nd, 2025 at 3:43pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 3:33pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…



Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?


Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fig...

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  Grin Grin


I read, "If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no." which is not, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…" which is what CerealBrain9 claimed was said.  Now, rather than be an ignoramus and claim something says something it doesn't, Soren, how about you prove you have a PhD and show us where it was claimed, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…" or is English a too hard a language for you to understand, Dane?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Marcia Langton:

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”

This means that if the Voice referendum fails, aborigines like her will say no to performing WTC even if non-aborigines have the temerity to ask for it.  Non-aborigines should not now have the temerity to look her in the eye and ask for a WTC ceremony and she would say no even if they did.



This is what she said and this is what it means.  I don't know what you think it means if not this. Do tell us.









Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 46311
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #22 - May 2nd, 2025 at 3:55pm
 
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 3:43pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 3:33pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…



Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?


Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fig...

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  Grin Grin


I read, "If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no." which is not, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…" which is what CerealBrain9 claimed was said.  Now, rather than be an ignoramus and claim something says something it doesn't, Soren, how about you prove you have a PhD and show us where it was claimed, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…" or is English a too hard a language for you to understand, Dane?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Marcia Langton:

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”

This means that if the Voice referendum fails, aborigines like her will say no to performing WTC even if non-aborigines have the temerity to ask for it.  Non-aborigines should not now have the temerity to look her in the eye and ask for a WTC ceremony and she would say no even if they did.

This is what she said and this is what it means.  I don't know what you think it means if not this. Do tell us.


I read, "If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no." which is not, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…" which is what CerealBrain9 claimed was said.  Now, rather than be an ignoramus and claim something says something it doesn't, Soren, how about you prove you have a PhD and show us where it was claimed, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…" or is English a too hard a language for you to understand, Dane?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 151060
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #23 - May 2nd, 2025 at 4:09pm
 
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…



Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?


Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fig...

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  Grin Grin


That doesn't say: "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…"

You must have highlighted the wrong bit.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 90009
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #24 - May 2nd, 2025 at 4:15pm
 
Peccary twisting like another Japanese carrier at Midway...

...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 57357
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #25 - May 2nd, 2025 at 4:15pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:09pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…



Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?


Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fig...

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  Grin Grin


That doesn't say: "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…"

You must have highlighted the wrong bit.




Both you and Bbwiyawn are sly idiots, liars and ****wits.

You put Serial's words between quotation marks and then moronically pretend he was quoting an Aborigines verbatim. He wasn't. He conveyed the meaning of what Langdon said, whose actual words I quilted.


Now **** off, both of you, lying bozos.


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 90009
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #26 - May 2nd, 2025 at 4:16pm
 
Peccary twisting like another Japanese carrier at Midway...

...
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 2nd, 2025 at 4:41pm by Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 151060
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #27 - May 2nd, 2025 at 4:18pm
 
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:09pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…



Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?


Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fig...

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  Grin Grin


That doesn't say: "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…"

You must have highlighted the wrong bit.




Both you and Bbwiyawn are sly idiots, liars and ****wits.

You put Serial's words between quotation marks and then moronically pretend he was quoting an Aborigines verbatim. He wasn't. He conveyed the meaning of what Langdon said, whose actual words I quilted.


Now **** off, both of you, lying bozos.




White flag accepted.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 90009
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #28 - May 2nd, 2025 at 4:44pm
 
"Speaking to The Australian in April, Prof Langton said if the Voice failed non-Indigenous Australians would feel too ashamed to ask traditional owners to do a Welcome to Country.

'How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference?' she said.

'If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.'"


Well - nobody's asking.... so there's no need for her to say no, ay?
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 46311
Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Reply #29 - May 2nd, 2025 at 6:27pm
 
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:09pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:
SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…



Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?


Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fig...

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  Grin Grin


That doesn't say: "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…"

You must have highlighted the wrong bit.


Both you and Bbwiyawn are sly idiots, liars and ****wits.

You put Serial's words between quotation marks and then moronically pretend he was quoting an Aborigines verbatim. He wasn't. He conveyed the meaning of what Langdon said, whose actual words I quilted.

Now **** off, both of you, lying bozos.


Why are we "lying", Soren?  All I have asked is an accurate quote that reflects what CerealBrain9 proclaimed.  How is that, "lying"?  The only people who seem upset are those who want to believe what ever they want about Indigenous Australians.  Does that describe you, Soren?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print