Australian Politics Forum - MTG goes ballistic at UK reporter

scope

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1514
Gender: male

Re: MTG goes ballistic at UK reporter
Reply #15 - Mar 28^th, 2025 at 11:15am

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:54am:

scope wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:21am:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:00am:

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 12:57am:

Frank wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 3:28pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 12:38pm:

MTG showing how small minded she really is. Rather pathetic but not surprising...

Gotcha! didn't work. Good.

That's right. MTG deflected, played whatabout that, then ran off.

But now you're here, would you care to share your thoughts on the most incompetent security breach in US history?

Cheers.

I have read the transcript. There is nothing there that you wouldn't read in any newspaper the next day. Or even any newspaper the day before.

How Goldberg got onto that list is a question. I even wondered if he was included out of mischief, deliberately, as a leak to friend and foe, to give a glimpse into the 'unguarded' thinking of the US national security leadership. In any case, was able to publish that chat because there was nothing in it to threaten national security.

More bs from frank.

Hey frank, you dont broadcast what time the bombing will start 3 hours before the first bombs are dropped.

For once grow some balls and call these idiots out for their incompetence.

It was not broadcast. Wake up.

https://x.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1904938349883797850

Hegseth broadcast information to 18 other people in the chat frank, learn English.

Given that certain passwords used by hegseth have been found online, who knows exactly who may have been privy to that chat frank.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 55199
Gender: male

Re: MTG goes ballistic at UK reporter
Reply #16 - Mar 28^th, 2025 at 11:59am

scope wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 11:15am:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:54am:

scope wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:21am:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:00am:

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 12:57am:

Frank wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 3:28pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 12:38pm:

MTG showing how small minded she really is. Rather pathetic but not surprising...

Gotcha! didn't work. Good.

That's right. MTG deflected, played whatabout that, then ran off.

But now you're here, would you care to share your thoughts on the most incompetent security breach in US history?

Cheers.

I have read the transcript. There is nothing there that you wouldn't read in any newspaper the next day. Or even any newspaper the day before.

How Goldberg got onto that list is a question. I even wondered if he was included out of mischief, deliberately, as a leak to friend and foe, to give a glimpse into the 'unguarded' thinking of the US national security leadership. In any case, was able to publish that chat because there was nothing in it to threaten national security.

More bs from frank.

Hey frank, you dont broadcast what time the bombing will start 3 hours before the first bombs are dropped.

For once grow some balls and call these idiots out for their incompetence.

It was not broadcast. Wake up.

https://x.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1904938349883797850

Hegseth broadcast information to 18 other people in the chat frank, learn English.

Given that certain passwords used by hegseth have been found online, who knows exactly who may have been privy to that chat frank.

Broadcast doesn't mean what you think it means. 18 people in a chat room is not broadcast.

How Goldberg was invited in is the question. I expect it was someone in Mike Walz's communication team who made the mistake. It's a techy error. A DEI hire left-over.... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 148715
Gender: male

Re: MTG goes ballistic at UK reporter
Reply #17 - Mar 28^th, 2025 at 12:39pm

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 11:59am:

scope wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 11:15am:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:54am:

scope wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:21am:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:00am:

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 12:57am:

Frank wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 3:28pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 12:38pm:

MTG showing how small minded she really is. Rather pathetic but not surprising...

Gotcha! didn't work. Good.

That's right. MTG deflected, played whatabout that, then ran off.

But now you're here, would you care to share your thoughts on the most incompetent security breach in US history?

Cheers.

I have read the transcript. There is nothing there that you wouldn't read in any newspaper the next day. Or even any newspaper the day before.

How Goldberg got onto that list is a question. I even wondered if he was included out of mischief, deliberately, as a leak to friend and foe, to give a glimpse into the 'unguarded' thinking of the US national security leadership. In any case, was able to publish that chat because there was nothing in it to threaten national security.

More bs from frank.

Hey frank, you dont broadcast what time the bombing will start 3 hours before the first bombs are dropped.

For once grow some balls and call these idiots out for their incompetence.

It was not broadcast. Wake up.

https://x.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1904938349883797850

Hegseth broadcast information to 18 other people in the chat frank, learn English.

Given that certain passwords used by hegseth have been found online, who knows exactly who may have been privy to that chat frank.

Broadcast doesn't mean what you think it means. 18 people in a chat room is not broadcast.

Broadcast messaging, also known as message broadcasting, batch messaging, and bulk messaging, is a technique used to send a message to a large number of recipients simultaneously.

In the Signal app, you can send multimedia messages to multiple contacts by using the "Broadcast Media" feature: open Signal, tap the camera icon, capture or select media, optionally create a view-once message, select up to 5 chats, and tap send.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

scope

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1514
Gender: male

Re: MTG goes ballistic at UK reporter
Reply #18 - Mar 28^th, 2025 at 1:04pm

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 11:59am:

scope wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 11:15am:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:54am:

scope wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:21am:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:00am:

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 12:57am:

Frank wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 3:28pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 12:38pm:

MTG showing how small minded she really is. Rather pathetic but not surprising...

Gotcha! didn't work. Good.

That's right. MTG deflected, played whatabout that, then ran off.

But now you're here, would you care to share your thoughts on the most incompetent security breach in US history?

Cheers.

I have read the transcript. There is nothing there that you wouldn't read in any newspaper the next day. Or even any newspaper the day before.

How Goldberg got onto that list is a question. I even wondered if he was included out of mischief, deliberately, as a leak to friend and foe, to give a glimpse into the 'unguarded' thinking of the US national security leadership. In any case, was able to publish that chat because there was nothing in it to threaten national security.

More bs from frank.

Hey frank, you dont broadcast what time the bombing will start 3 hours before the first bombs are dropped.

For once grow some balls and call these idiots out for their incompetence.

It was not broadcast. Wake up.

https://x.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1904938349883797850

Hegseth broadcast information to 18 other people in the chat frank, learn English.

Given that certain passwords used by hegseth have been found online, who knows exactly who may have been privy to that chat frank.

Broadcast doesn't mean what you think it means. 18 people in a chat room is not broadcast.

How Goldberg was invited in is the question. I expect it was someone in Mike Walz's communication team who made the mistake. It's a techy error. A DEI hire left-over.... Roll Eyes

Can never admit you are wrong,can you frank Grin

You know who was responsible for Goldberg being invited frank?

Walz frank, he invited Goldberg not some left over dei hire from Grin

bugger youre pathetic frank.

It seems Goldberg had the same initials as the correct person who Walz wanted to invite.

Everytime you twist frank,you keep getting it wrong, grow some balls frank, blame those top people trump hired. Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 55199
Gender: male

Re: MTG goes ballistic at UK reporter
Reply #19 - Mar 28^th, 2025 at 1:45pm

scope wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 1:04pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 11:59am:

scope wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 11:15am:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:54am:

scope wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:21am:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:00am:

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 12:57am:

Frank wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 3:28pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 12:38pm:

MTG showing how small minded she really is. Rather pathetic but not surprising...

Gotcha! didn't work. Good.

That's right. MTG deflected, played whatabout that, then ran off.

But now you're here, would you care to share your thoughts on the most incompetent security breach in US history?

Cheers.

I have read the transcript. There is nothing there that you wouldn't read in any newspaper the next day. Or even any newspaper the day before.

How Goldberg got onto that list is a question. I even wondered if he was included out of mischief, deliberately, as a leak to friend and foe, to give a glimpse into the 'unguarded' thinking of the US national security leadership. In any case, was able to publish that chat because there was nothing in it to threaten national security.

More bs from frank.

Hey frank, you dont broadcast what time the bombing will start 3 hours before the first bombs are dropped.

For once grow some balls and call these idiots out for their incompetence.

It was not broadcast. Wake up.

https://x.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1904938349883797850

Hegseth broadcast information to 18 other people in the chat frank, learn English.

Given that certain passwords used by hegseth have been found online, who knows exactly who may have been privy to that chat frank.

Broadcast doesn't mean what you think it means. 18 people in a chat room is not broadcast.

How Goldberg was invited in is the question. I expect it was someone in Mike Walz's communication team who made the mistake. It's a techy error. A DEI hire left-over.... Roll Eyes

Can never admit you are wrong,can you frank Grin

You know who was responsible for Goldberg being invited frank?

Walz frank, he invited Goldberg not some left over dei hire from Grin

bugger youre pathetic frank.

It seems Goldberg had the same initials as the correct person who Walz wanted to invite.

Everytime you twist frank,you keep getting it wrong, grow some balls frank, blame those top people trump hired. Grin

My surmise is that these guys are not maintaining their various Signal, email, Twatter, phone etc lists. People a lot lower in the pecking order have personal and executive assistants to do that.

Who is this other JG who was meant to be on the list? Nobody has said he'd been left out.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

FD

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 100117

Re: MTG goes ballistic at UK reporter
Reply #20 - Mar 28^th, 2025 at 5:41pm

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:00am:

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 12:57am:

Frank wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 3:28pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 12:38pm:

MTG showing how small minded she really is. Rather pathetic but not surprising...

Gotcha! didn't work. Good.

That's right. MTG deflected, played whatabout that, then ran off.

But now you're here, would you care to share your thoughts on the most incompetent security breach in US history?

Cheers.

I have read the transcript. There is nothing there that you wouldn't read in any newspaper the next day. Or even any newspaper the day before.

How Goldberg got onto that list is a question. I even wondered if he was included out of mischief, deliberately, as a leak to friend and foe, to give a glimpse into the 'unguarded' thinking of the US national security leadership. In any case, was able to publish that chat because there was nothing in it to threaten national security.

No newspaper has ever been accidentally invited to a war plan meeting, dear - not in the history of print media, anyway.

Two world wars, a cold war and all the endless wars since - never ever.

How Goldberg got onto that list is on the public record. Mike Waltz said he accidentally added him to the chat, you silly old thing.

Mike didn't say if he accidentally invited anybody else.

Loose lips sink ships, innit. Who knows? Maybe Vlad was in there too.

So now you know that, would you care to share your newly informed views?

Cheers.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 55199
Gender: male

Re: MTG goes ballistic at UK reporter
Reply #21 - Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:13pm

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 5:41pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:00am:

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 12:57am:

Frank wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 3:28pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 12:38pm:

MTG showing how small minded she really is. Rather pathetic but not surprising...

Gotcha! didn't work. Good.

That's right. MTG deflected, played whatabout that, then ran off.

But now you're here, would you care to share your thoughts on the most incompetent security breach in US history?

Cheers.

I have read the transcript. There is nothing there that you wouldn't read in any newspaper the next day. Or even any newspaper the day before.

How Goldberg got onto that list is a question. I even wondered if he was included out of mischief, deliberately, as a leak to friend and foe, to give a glimpse into the 'unguarded' thinking of the US national security leadership. In any case, was able to publish that chat because there was nothing in it to threaten national security.

No newspaper has ever been accidentally invited to a war plan meeting, dear - not in the history of print media, anyway.

Two world wars, a cold war and all the endless wars since - never ever.

How Goldberg got onto that list is on the public record. Mike Waltz said he accidentally added him to the chat, you silly old thing.

Mike didn't say if he accidentally invited anybody else.

Loose lips sink ships, innit. Who knows? Maybe Vlad was in there too.

So now you know that, would you care to share your newly informed views?

Cheers.

A hit on the hootin' Hotties has been promised. So no surprise there.

Who they would target?? Hmm... that's a mystery, innit? Leaders? Comms? Capability? Really, really hard to know, innit.
Will allies be involved? They never have been before, so who could possibly guess?

Tell us, paki, what was said in those texts that could not be published in a newspaper the next day - or the previous day - because it's highly sensitive, classified information?

Nothing. Birdy num num. That's why it could be published.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 148715
Gender: male

Re: MTG goes ballistic at UK reporter
Reply #22 - Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:22pm

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:13pm:

Tell us, paki, what was said in those texts that could not be published in a newspaper the next day - or the previous day - because it's highly sensitive, classified information?

The target, their location, and the exact time they were going to attack.

e.g. 1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package) 1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

FD

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 100117

Re: MTG goes ballistic at UK reporter
Reply #23 - Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:30pm

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:13pm:

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 5:41pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:00am:

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 12:57am:

Frank wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 3:28pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 12:38pm:

MTG showing how small minded she really is. Rather pathetic but not surprising...

Gotcha! didn't work. Good.

That's right. MTG deflected, played whatabout that, then ran off.

But now you're here, would you care to share your thoughts on the most incompetent security breach in US history?

Cheers.

I have read the transcript. There is nothing there that you wouldn't read in any newspaper the next day. Or even any newspaper the day before.

How Goldberg got onto that list is a question. I even wondered if he was included out of mischief, deliberately, as a leak to friend and foe, to give a glimpse into the 'unguarded' thinking of the US national security leadership. In any case, was able to publish that chat because there was nothing in it to threaten national security.

No newspaper has ever been accidentally invited to a war plan meeting, dear - not in the history of print media, anyway.

Two world wars, a cold war and all the endless wars since - never ever.

How Goldberg got onto that list is on the public record. Mike Waltz said he accidentally added him to the chat, you silly old thing.

Mike didn't say if he accidentally invited anybody else.

Loose lips sink ships, innit. Who knows? Maybe Vlad was in there too.

So now you know that, would you care to share your newly informed views?

Cheers.

A hit on the hootin' Hotties has been promised. So no surprise there.

Who they would target?? Hmm... that's a mystery, innit? Leaders? Comms? Capability? Really, really hard to know, innit.
Will allies be involved? They never have been before, so who could possibly guess?

Tell us, paki, what was said in those texts that could not be published in a newspaper the next day - or the previous day - because it's highly sensitive, classified information?

Nothing. Birdy num num. That's why it could be published.

No no, dear boy, you were asked about the most inept security breach in modern history. Ancient history too, Trojan horses excluded.

So, no more pwemises, no more whatabout-that, no more no-speaka and Birdy Num Num. What do you think about the most ridiculous blunder in living memory?

If you refuse to answer, just say why.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 55199
Gender: male

Re: MTG goes ballistic at UK reporter
Reply #24 - Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:48pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:22pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:13pm:

Tell us, paki, what was said in those texts that could not be published in a newspaper the next day - or the previous day - because it's highly sensitive, classified information?

The target, their location, and the exact time they were going to attack.

e.g. 1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package) 1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)

Did Goldberg pass that on to the hootin Houties?

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 55199
Gender: male

Re: MTG goes ballistic at UK reporter
Reply #25 - Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:49pm

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:30pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:13pm:

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 5:41pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 10:00am:

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 12:57am:

Frank wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 3:28pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 27^th, 2025 at 12:38pm:

MTG showing how small minded she really is. Rather pathetic but not surprising...

Gotcha! didn't work. Good.

That's right. MTG deflected, played whatabout that, then ran off.

But now you're here, would you care to share your thoughts on the most incompetent security breach in US history?

Cheers.

I have read the transcript. There is nothing there that you wouldn't read in any newspaper the next day. Or even any newspaper the day before.

How Goldberg got onto that list is a question. I even wondered if he was included out of mischief, deliberately, as a leak to friend and foe, to give a glimpse into the 'unguarded' thinking of the US national security leadership. In any case, was able to publish that chat because there was nothing in it to threaten national security.

No newspaper has ever been accidentally invited to a war plan meeting, dear - not in the history of print media, anyway.

Two world wars, a cold war and all the endless wars since - never ever.

How Goldberg got onto that list is on the public record. Mike Waltz said he accidentally added him to the chat, you silly old thing.

Mike didn't say if he accidentally invited anybody else.

Loose lips sink ships, innit. Who knows? Maybe Vlad was in there too.

So now you know that, would you care to share your newly informed views?

Cheers.

A hit on the hootin' Hotties has been promised. So no surprise there.

Who they would target?? Hmm... that's a mystery, innit? Leaders? Comms? Capability? Really, really hard to know, innit.
Will allies be involved? They never have been before, so who could possibly guess?

Tell us, paki, what was said in those texts that could not be published in a newspaper the next day - or the previous day - because it's highly sensitive, classified information?

Nothing. Birdy num num. That's why it could be published.

No no, dear boy, you were asked about the most inept security breach in modern history. Ancient history too, Trojan horses excluded.

So, no more pwemises, no more whatabout-that, no more no-speaka and Birdy Num Num. What do you think about the most ridiculous blunder in living memory?

If you refuse to answer, just say why.

Ridiculous, yes.
Significant? No.

It is infinitely less significant than Hillary's blunder at the attack on the US Embassy in Labia. For example. Or wikileaks. Or the Russia hoax. Or Biden's incapacity, covered up. Or lots of other blunders.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 148715
Gender: male

Re: MTG goes ballistic at UK reporter
Reply #26 - Mar 28^th, 2025 at 8:05pm

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:48pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:22pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:13pm:

Tell us, paki, what was said in those texts that could not be published in a newspaper the next day - or the previous day - because it's highly sensitive, classified information?

The target, their location, and the exact time they were going to attack.

e.g. 1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package) 1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)

Did Goldberg pass that on to the hootin Houties?

Hegseth passed it on to a journalist, on his private phone.

A journalist described by Hegseth as "a deceitful and highly discredited so-called journalist who has made a profession of peddling hoaxes".

Why did they pass it on to someone they hate so much?

How many other civilians received the message?

How many of their private phones were hacked? One was in Moscow.

Their reckless incompetence put the pilots' lives in danger.

Does that not concern you?

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 55199
Gender: male

Re: MTG goes ballistic at UK reporter
Reply #27 - Mar 28^th, 2025 at 8:14pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 8:05pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:48pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:22pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:13pm:

Tell us, paki, what was said in those texts that could not be published in a newspaper the next day - or the previous day - because it's highly sensitive, classified information?

The target, their location, and the exact time they were going to attack.

e.g. 1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package) 1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)

Did Goldberg pass that on to the hootin Houties?

Hegseth passed it on to a journalist, on his private phone.

A journalist described by Hegseth as "a deceitful and highly discredited so-called journalist who has made a profession of peddling hoaxes".

Why did they pass it on to someone they hate so much?

How many other civilians received the message?

How many of their private phones were hacked? One was in Moscow.

Their reckless incompetence put the pilots' lives in danger.

Does that not concern you?

How many? Tell us.

Who outside the 18 received the info before the strikes? tell us.

Who benefited from Goldberg being on the list? Houthis? Anyone? Tell us.

What has changed because Goldberg was on the list? Other than eggs on faces?
Nothing. Absolutely nothing.
No pilot danger, no Houthi benefit, nothing.

An embarrassing blunder with no discernible negative consequence to ANY of the military personnel that actually did the work.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 28^th, 2025 at 8:20pm by Frank »

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 148715
Gender: male

Re: MTG goes ballistic at UK reporter
Reply #28 - Mar 28^th, 2025 at 8:17pm

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 8:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 8:05pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:48pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:22pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:13pm:

Tell us, paki, what was said in those texts that could not be published in a newspaper the next day - or the previous day - because it's highly sensitive, classified information?

The target, their location, and the exact time they were going to attack.

e.g. 1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package) 1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)

Did Goldberg pass that on to the hootin Houties?

Hegseth passed it on to a journalist, on his private phone.

A journalist described by Hegseth as "a deceitful and highly discredited so-called journalist who has made a profession of peddling hoaxes".

Why did they pass it on to someone they hate so much?

How many other civilians received the message?

How many of their private phones were hacked? One was in Moscow.

Their reckless incompetence put the pilots' lives in danger.

Does that not concern you?

How many? Tell us.

Who outside the 18 received the info before the strikes? tell us.

Their reckless incompetence put the pilots' lives in danger.

Does that not concern you?

Of course it doesn't.

You couldn't care less how many brave military personnel die as a result of Trump's incompetence.

You love rapists, and you love watching your favourite rapist destroy people's lives.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 55199
Gender: male

Re: MTG goes ballistic at UK reporter
Reply #29 - Mar 28^th, 2025 at 8:27pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 8:17pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 8:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 8:05pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:48pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:22pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2025 at 7:13pm:

Tell us, paki, what was said in those texts that could not be published in a newspaper the next day - or the previous day - because it's highly sensitive, classified information?

The target, their location, and the exact time they were going to attack.

e.g. 1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package) 1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)

Did Goldberg pass that on to the hootin Houties?

Hegseth passed it on to a journalist, on his private phone.

A journalist described by Hegseth as "a deceitful and highly discredited so-called journalist who has made a profession of peddling hoaxes".

Why did they pass it on to someone they hate so much?

How many other civilians received the message?

How many of their private phones were hacked? One was in Moscow.

Their reckless incompetence put the pilots' lives in danger.

Does that not concern you?

How many? Tell us.

Who outside the 18 received the info before the strikes? tell us.

Their reckless incompetence put the pilots' lives in danger.

You are lying again.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged