Australian Politics Forum - Anti-Australian class action

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 44332	Anti-Australian class action Mar 12^th, 2025 at 2:05pm Anti-Australian punting class action plaintiff wants equity for US kids - How soon before we see Trump impose tariffs on us for American football dominance? Tsk, tsk, tsk...
Back to top	It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 52755 Gender:	Re: Anti-Australian class action Reply #1 - Mar 12^th, 2025 at 2:19pm While the Lefty loser ALP remain in power, Trump will never offer concession. You watch things turn around for Australia once the NLP are in. So far Tweedle-dee Turnbull has just made things worse for Australia.
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 98425

Re: Anti-Australian class action
Reply #2 - Mar 12^th, 2025 at 3:25pm

Jasin wrote on Mar 12^th, 2025 at 2:19pm:

While the Lefty loser ALP remain in power, Trump will never offer concession.
You watch things turn around for Australia once the NLP are in.
So far Tweedle-dee Turnbull has just made things worse for Australia.

Turnbull's in the LNP, you rediculous old fool. Your DL has no idea which party's in power here and wouldn't care if he did.

Which party's Vlad in?

Oh look - you've gone.

Back to top

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 19929
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Anti-Australian class action
Reply #3 - Mar 13^th, 2025 at 7:08am

Jasin wrote on Mar 12^th, 2025 at 2:19pm:

While the Lefty loser ALP remain in power, Trump will never offer concession.
You watch things turn around for Australia once the NLP are in.
So far Tweedle-dee Turnbull has just made things worse for Australia.

What did the other countries' governments do to get their concessions?

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 51449
Gender: male

Re: Anti-Australian class action
Reply #4 - Mar 13^th, 2025 at 7:33am

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 12^th, 2025 at 2:05pm:

Anti-Australian punting class action plaintiff wants equity for US kids - How soon before we see Trump impose tariffs on us for American football dominance? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Don't try to be even stupider than you naturally ( and thanks to your extensive 'education') are, Bbwiyawn.

The court documents state that allowing Australian athletes in their mid-20s — some of whom have played professional Australian rules football — to win scholarships gives them an unfair advantage over student athletes who normally enter college aged 18 or 19.

"ProKick all but guarantees its trainees who pay tuition exceeding $15,000, will receive a full scholarship to punt in the United States upon completion of their pre-collegiate training school," the court documents say.

"This age and experience disparity grants Australians an unfair competitive advantage in developing their physical skills, leg strength, and technical punting expertise compared to American high school graduates who lack the equivalent timing opportunity to acquire a similar skill competency."

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

chimera Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 13182 Armidale Gender:	Re: Anti-Australian class action Reply #5 - Mar 13^th, 2025 at 9:13am Cheap imported footballers are fed on low-grade beef and dumped in US above the immigrant muscle quotas. Oz Medicare adds to the insults to MAGAs with leg cramps.
Back to top	IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 19929
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Anti-Australian class action
Reply #6 - Mar 13^th, 2025 at 10:23am

Frank wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 7:33am:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 12^th, 2025 at 2:05pm:

Anti-Australian punting class action plaintiff wants equity for US kids - How soon before we see Trump impose tariffs on us for American football dominance? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Don't try to be even stupider than you naturally ( and thanks to your extensive 'education') are, Bbwiyawn.

The court documents state that allowing Australian athletes in their mid-20s — some of whom have played professional Australian rules football — to win scholarships gives them an unfair advantage over student athletes who normally enter college aged 18 or 19.

"ProKick all but guarantees its trainees who pay tuition exceeding $15,000, will receive a full scholarship to punt in the United States upon completion of their pre-collegiate training school," the court documents say.

"This age and experience disparity grants Australians an unfair competitive advantage in developing their physical skills, leg strength, and technical punting expertise compared to American high school graduates who lack the equivalent timing opportunity to acquire a similar skill competency."

So you want DEI?

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 77073
Gender: male

Re: Anti-Australian class action
Reply #7 - Mar 13^th, 2025 at 10:58am

ProudKangaroo wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 10:23am:

Frank wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 7:33am:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 12^th, 2025 at 2:05pm:

Anti-Australian punting class action plaintiff wants equity for US kids - How soon before we see Trump impose tariffs on us for American football dominance? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Don't try to be even stupider than you naturally ( and thanks to your extensive 'education') are, Bbwiyawn.

The court documents state that allowing Australian athletes in their mid-20s — some of whom have played professional Australian rules football — to win scholarships gives them an unfair advantage over student athletes who normally enter college aged 18 or 19.

"ProKick all but guarantees its trainees who pay tuition exceeding $15,000, will receive a full scholarship to punt in the United States upon completion of their pre-collegiate training school," the court documents say.

"This age and experience disparity grants Australians an unfair competitive advantage in developing their physical skills, leg strength, and technical punting expertise compared to American high school graduates who lack the equivalent timing opportunity to acquire a similar skill competency."

So you want DEI?

Only when it suits him Cheesy

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 51449
Gender: male

Re: Anti-Australian class action
Reply #8 - Mar 13^th, 2025 at 11:02am

ProudKangaroo wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 10:23am:

Frank wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 7:33am:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 12^th, 2025 at 2:05pm:

Anti-Australian punting class action plaintiff wants equity for US kids - How soon before we see Trump impose tariffs on us for American football dominance? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Don't try to be even stupider than you naturally ( and thanks to your extensive 'education') are, Bbwiyawn.

The court documents state that allowing Australian athletes in their mid-20s — some of whom have played professional Australian rules football — to win scholarships gives them an unfair advantage over student athletes who normally enter college aged 18 or 19.

"ProKick all but guarantees its trainees who pay tuition exceeding $15,000, will receive a full scholarship to punt in the United States upon completion of their pre-collegiate training school," the court documents say.

"This age and experience disparity grants Australians an unfair competitive advantage in developing their physical skills, leg strength, and technical punting expertise compared to American high school graduates who lack the equivalent timing opportunity to acquire a similar skill competency."

So you want DEI?

No. I don't want you and Bbwiyawn get off on or away with your retarded faggotry.

How is it DEI to NOT let blokes compete in women's sports or, as here, object to seasoned footballers competing with school leavers for sport scholarships.

You two bozos stand out for you inability to think. You have made it your trademark.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 51449
Gender: male

Re: Anti-Australian class action
Reply #9 - Mar 13^th, 2025 at 11:06am

Frank wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 11:02am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 10:23am:

Frank wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 7:33am:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 12^th, 2025 at 2:05pm:

Anti-Australian punting class action plaintiff wants equity for US kids - How soon before we see Trump impose tariffs on us for American football dominance? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Don't try to be even stupider than you naturally ( and thanks to your extensive 'education') are, Bbwiyawn.

The court documents state that allowing Australian athletes in their mid-20s — some of whom have played professional Australian rules football — to win scholarships gives them an unfair advantage over student athletes who normally enter college aged 18 or 19.

"ProKick all but guarantees its trainees who pay tuition exceeding $15,000, will receive a full scholarship to punt in the United States upon completion of their pre-collegiate training school," the court documents say.

"This age and experience disparity grants Australians an unfair competitive advantage in developing their physical skills, leg strength, and technical punting expertise compared to American high school graduates who lack the equivalent timing opportunity to acquire a similar skill competency."

So you want DEI?

No. I don't want you and Bbwiyawn get off on or away with your retarded faggotry.

How is it DEI to NOT let blokes compete in women's sports or, as here, object to seasoned footballers competing with school leavers for sport scholarships.

You two bozos stand out for you inability to think. You have made it your trademark. ***

*** oh, and let's not forget the Thicko as Mince-o Supremo. He's quick to utter mindless idiocies, too.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 19929
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Anti-Australian class action
Reply #10 - Mar 13^th, 2025 at 11:15am

Frank wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 11:02am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 10:23am:

Frank wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 7:33am:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 12^th, 2025 at 2:05pm:

Anti-Australian punting class action plaintiff wants equity for US kids - How soon before we see Trump impose tariffs on us for American football dominance? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Don't try to be even stupider than you naturally ( and thanks to your extensive 'education') are, Bbwiyawn.

The court documents state that allowing Australian athletes in their mid-20s — some of whom have played professional Australian rules football — to win scholarships gives them an unfair advantage over student athletes who normally enter college aged 18 or 19.

"ProKick all but guarantees its trainees who pay tuition exceeding $15,000, will receive a full scholarship to punt in the United States upon completion of their pre-collegiate training school," the court documents say.

"This age and experience disparity grants Australians an unfair competitive advantage in developing their physical skills, leg strength, and technical punting expertise compared to American high school graduates who lack the equivalent timing opportunity to acquire a similar skill competency."

So you want DEI?

No. I don't want you and Bbwiyawn get off on or away with your retarded faggotry.

How is it DEI to NOT let blokes compete in women's sports or, as here, object to seasoned footballers competing with school leavers for sport scholarships.

You two bozos stand out for you inability to think. You have made it your trademark.

So after all this time, you still don't know what DEI means then?

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 51449
Gender: male

Re: Anti-Australian class action
Reply #11 - Mar 13^th, 2025 at 11:22am

ProudKangaroo wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 11:15am:

Frank wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 11:02am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 10:23am:

Frank wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 7:33am:

[quote author=Brian_Ross link=1741752341/0#0 date=1741752341]Anti-Australian punting class action plaintiff wants equity for US kids - How soon before we see Trump impose tariffs on us for American football dominance? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Don't try to be even stupider than you naturally ( and thanks to your extensive 'education') are, Bbwiyawn.

The court documents state that allowing Australian athletes in their mid-20s — some of whom have played professional Australian rules football — to win scholarships gives them an unfair advantage over student athletes who normally enter college aged 18 or 19.

"ProKick all but guarantees its trainees who pay tuition exceeding $15,000, will receive a full scholarship to punt in the United States upon completion of their pre-collegiate training school," the court documents say.

"This age and experience disparity grants Australians an unfair competitive advantage in developing their physical skills, leg strength, and technical punting expertise compared to American high school graduates who lack the equivalent timing opportunity to acquire a similar skill competency."

So you want DEI?[/quote]

No. I don't want you and Bbwiyawn get off on or away with your retarded faggotry.

How is it DEI to NOT let blokes compete in women's sports or, as here, object to seasoned footballers competing with school leavers for sport scholarships.

You two bozos stand out for you inability to think. You have made it your trademark.

So after all this time, you still don't know what DEI means then?

As I said, dont be stupider than you already, naturally are.

How is it DEI to NOT endorse blokes as bepenised women or having grown-ups compete with kids for sport scholarships? You have to be hellbent on on retarded faggotry to label opposition to this sort of nnonsense as DEI - And then moronically double down and yap about the definition of DEI.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44332

Re: Anti-Australian class action
Reply #12 - Mar 13^th, 2025 at 11:46am

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, so much for your patriotism, hey, Soren? You come here as an immigrant and your welcomed by Australian society and what does it ask you in return? Support in our sports, support for our athletes, support for your fellow Australians but you turn your back on us at the first opportunity. You hate Australians so much I have to ask why you call yourself an Australian when in reality you're just a blow in, an immigrant. Perhaps you should go home where your needed by your fellow Danes, hey? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 19929
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Anti-Australian class action
Reply #13 - Mar 13^th, 2025 at 12:13pm

Frank wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 11:22am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 11:15am:

Frank wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 11:02am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 10:23am:

Frank wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 7:33am:

[quote author=Brian_Ross link=1741752341/0#0 date=1741752341]Anti-Australian punting class action plaintiff wants equity for US kids - How soon before we see Trump impose tariffs on us for American football dominance? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Don't try to be even stupider than you naturally ( and thanks to your extensive 'education') are, Bbwiyawn.

The court documents state that allowing Australian athletes in their mid-20s — some of whom have played professional Australian rules football — to win scholarships gives them an unfair advantage over student athletes who normally enter college aged 18 or 19.

"ProKick all but guarantees its trainees who pay tuition exceeding $15,000, will receive a full scholarship to punt in the United States upon completion of their pre-collegiate training school," the court documents say.

"This age and experience disparity grants Australians an unfair competitive advantage in developing their physical skills, leg strength, and technical punting expertise compared to American high school graduates who lack the equivalent timing opportunity to acquire a similar skill competency."

So you want DEI?[/quote]

No. I don't want you and Bbwiyawn get off on or away with your retarded faggotry.

How is it DEI to NOT let blokes compete in women's sports or, as here, object to seasoned footballers competing with school leavers for sport scholarships.

You two bozos stand out for you inability to think. You have made it your trademark.

So after all this time, you still don't know what DEI means then?

As I said, dont be stupider than you already, naturally are.

How is it DEI to NOT endorse blokes as bepenised women or having grown-ups compete with kids for sport scholarships? You have to be hellbent on on retarded faggotry to label opposition to this sort of nnonsense as DEI - And then moronically double down and yap about the definition of DEI.

You've changed the topic to gender when this is about age.

The Australian candidates for these scholarships have been granted them based on merit.

They are simply better than the American candidates.

So you're supporting the lawsuit to change the criteria to restrict the best college students from getting these grants or scholarships to instead go to less qualified people.

This has been the definition you've been using for DEI from pilots to fire chiefs, that they've been given the job not because they're the best candidate for it, but for some other reason, usually the colour of their skin, their gender or who they love.

Now you're supporting proposed changes to the scholarship program to not pick the best college candidates, but ones based on their age.

You're shifting it from merit to DEI (as you would call it).

This has nothing to do with men playing in women's leagues.

So as others have said, you're pro DEI when it suits you now?

What kind of "retarded faggotry" is this you're peddling now?

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36189
Gender: male

Re: Anti-Australian class action
Reply #14 - Mar 13^th, 2025 at 12:59pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 13^th, 2025 at 11:46am:

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, so much for your patriotism, hey, Soren? You come here as an immigrant and your welcomed by Australian society and what does it ask you in return? Support in our sports, support for our athletes, support for your fellow Australians but you turn your back on us at the first opportunity. You hate Australians so much I have to ask why you call yourself an Australian when in reality you're just a blow in, an immigrant. Perhaps you should go home where your needed by your fellow Danes, hey? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Twilight zone

Back to top

IP Logged