freediver wrote on Mar 4
th, 2025 at 4:14pm:
Some key questions that I am having trouble answering:
If you are out of the house, and you have no other security methods like dogs/cameras/alarms, and you leave the sliding windows open, and they have safety screens on the open windows (but not on the bit that does not open), how much of a deterrent is the safety screen? Is it any better than having nothing, or just fly screen? Is it as good as having the window closed, or would thieves prefer to break in through the safety screen rather than the glass?
How much difference would a security screen make in this scenario?
I cannot really find any good statistics on this.
It depends on what brand of security screen you have.
The ads for
Crimsafe look pretty good check them out.
If you're going to have screens on windows best to cover the whole window instead of just the bit that opens.
Crimsafe also double up as fly screens
Fly screens are easy to cut they do nothing for security, crims will break a window if they want to get in.
I would say window closed and locked with Crimsafe brand screens would be well above average for security.
You can also get roller shutters for windows they look like mini garage door which would be good in cyclone/bushfire areas.
EUFY brand cameras are pretty cheap you can talk through your phone to camera with WiFi. They have motion detection save video to cloud etc pretty much instant alert to mobile phone.
RING brand doorbell cameras are also pretty good reasonably priced you can answer the doorbell from your phone so they think someone is home it also takes video of everyone who comes to front door.
Last time i saw stats most break ins were through unlocked doors or windows.
It depends on what type of thief you want to keep out for how much you spend.
I know the spin. The more you spend, the safer you are. I can google 1000 sites telling the same story. What I want to know is, how much difference does it actually make?