Frank
|
MeisterEckhart wrote on May 1 st, 2025 at 1:34pm: Frank wrote on May 1 st, 2025 at 12:54pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on May 1 st, 2025 at 12:20pm: The politics of colour plays out most vehemently within the Anglosphere, but they are not restricted to it.
Indic and Sino cultures, rife with millennia-long obsession with us/them conflicts, will refer to colour as a feature of 'otherness', although not primarily... it is eclipsed by far more significant features, such as language, caste, tribe, ethnicity, cultural, religious and economic factors. Yes, there are non-racial differences, like class, religion, etc. These are cultural characteristics and can be changed or faked - viz my fair lady, prince and the pauper etc,etc. Which does not mean that racial features do not exist or aren't readily tecognised. My Fair Lady and Prince and the Pauper are fictions. Ask the Anglo-English if they can detect the socio-economic, cultural, social status of other Anglo-English almost immediately on sight... and if not immediately on sight, then within a minute of conversation, regardless of the expertise of their act or their received pronunciation. Some can even place them within a region, within a locality, within a street of the UK. Well, the Anglo English are of the same race. What you are talking about -socio-economic, cultural, social status - are categories we recognise within any group even if they are racially pretty homogeneous, as in England, Scandinavia, Australia until fairly recently, and in Japan, Korea even now. Still, you can tell a ruddy Scot from an English Rose. As for fiction, it doesn't mean untrue or unrecognisable. Quite the opposite.
|