Australian Politics Forum - ►►► Local Sheriffs to Enforce Immigration Laws ◀◀◀

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 54984
Gender: male

Re: ►►► Local Sheriffs to Enforce Immigration Laws ◀◀◀
Reply #30 - Dec 30^th, 2024 at 11:30am

FD wrote on Dec 30^th, 2024 at 11:13am:

Leroy wrote on Dec 29^th, 2024 at 11:32pm:

FD wrote on Dec 29^th, 2024 at 11:23pm:

We'd better seek legal advice. We'll ask our resident constitutional expert.

Panther, does your proud constitution task local sheriffs with locking up the invading hoards?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

I'm not a legal expert or even close but I would think the local sheriffs would receive a request from the federal agency to apprehend subjects and then the feds collect them up from the lock up.

I see. How would this request apply in Sanctuary Cities, Leroy?

Upon which grounds would local sheriffs detain them? They would be breaching their own state laws by LOCKING THEM UP.

Also, if we are to believe your DL, we're talking over 20 million women, children and men of military age (and that's a conservative estimate, believe me, I mean everybody's saying that). Where will local sheriffs LOCK THEM UP?

I think this one calls for a multiple, don't you?

a) In the Paddy Wagon with the tweakers and shoplifters
b) In the local jailhouse with the creeps and perps
c) In the local football stadium, razor-wired and electrified to prevent escape
d) In the house used to film the top-rating series, Celebrity Apprentice
e) In specially constructed maximum security detention centres contracted out to Elon's friends

When you're done with that, you'll need to answer this: which laws should local sheriffs break to LOCK THEM UP?

a) Local Sanctuary City ordinances
b) Habeas Corpus, wrongful arrest and kidnapping laws
c) The old boy's Supremacy Clause
d) Various treaties and international human rights agreements
e) The Constitution

We're still awaiting Panther's advice on E, dear, but do feel free to share your response.

The incoming Trump official noted that the president-elect has put him in charge of the largest deportation effort ever planned and he intends to run some of that campaign right through Chicago.

“We’re going to start right here in Chicago, Illinois. If your Chicago mayor doesn’t want to help, he can step aside,” Homan warned. “But if he impedes us — if he knowingly harbors or conceals an illegal alien — I will prosecute him.”

Not complicated, paki.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

FD

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 100010

Re: ►►► Local Sheriffs to Enforce Immigration Laws ◀◀◀
Reply #31 - Dec 30^th, 2024 at 4:48pm

Frank wrote on Dec 30^th, 2024 at 11:30am:

FD wrote on Dec 30^th, 2024 at 11:13am:

Leroy wrote on Dec 29^th, 2024 at 11:32pm:

FD wrote on Dec 29^th, 2024 at 11:23pm:

We'd better seek legal advice. We'll ask our resident constitutional expert.

Panther, does your proud constitution task local sheriffs with locking up the invading hoards?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

I'm not a legal expert or even close but I would think the local sheriffs would receive a request from the federal agency to apprehend subjects and then the feds collect them up from the lock up.

I see. How would this request apply in Sanctuary Cities, Leroy?

Upon which grounds would local sheriffs detain them? They would be breaching their own state laws by LOCKING THEM UP.

Also, if we are to believe your DL, we're talking over 20 million women, children and men of military age (and that's a conservative estimate, believe me, I mean everybody's saying that). Where will local sheriffs LOCK THEM UP?

I think this one calls for a multiple, don't you?

a) In the Paddy Wagon with the tweakers and shoplifters
b) In the local jailhouse with the creeps and perps
c) In the local football stadium, razor-wired and electrified to prevent escape
d) In the house used to film the top-rating series, Celebrity Apprentice
e) In specially constructed maximum security detention centres contracted out to Elon's friends

When you're done with that, you'll need to answer this: which laws should local sheriffs break to LOCK THEM UP?

a) Local Sanctuary City ordinances
b) Habeas Corpus, wrongful arrest and kidnapping laws
c) The old boy's Supremacy Clause
d) Various treaties and international human rights agreements
e) The Constitution

We're still awaiting Panther's advice on E, dear, but do feel free to share your response.

The incoming Trump official noted that the president-elect has put him in charge of the largest deportation effort ever planned and he intends to run some of that campaign right through Chicago.

“We’re going to start right here in Chicago, Illinois. If your Chicago mayor doesn’t want to help, he can step aside,” Homan warned. “But if he impedes us — if he knowingly harbors or conceals an illegal alien — I will prosecute him.”

Not complicated, paki.

Don't want to answer, eh?

Cunning. When you answer my question, wog, I might deign to answer yours.

Or I might just give you a yawn.

Either/or, no?

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: ►►► Local Sheriffs to Enforce Immigration Laws ◀◀◀ Reply #32 - Dec 30^th, 2024 at 5:05pm Frank wrote on Dec 30^th, 2024 at 11:30am: The incoming Trump official noted that the president-elect has put him in charge of the largest deportation effort ever planned and he intends to run some of that campaign right through Chicago. Did he clear that with Musk first?
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 54984
Gender: male

Re: ►►► Local Sheriffs to Enforce Immigration Laws ◀◀◀
Reply #33 - Dec 30^th, 2024 at 5:07pm

FD wrote on Dec 30^th, 2024 at 4:48pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 30^th, 2024 at 11:30am:

FD wrote on Dec 30^th, 2024 at 11:13am:

Leroy wrote on Dec 29^th, 2024 at 11:32pm:

FD wrote on Dec 29^th, 2024 at 11:23pm:

We'd better seek legal advice. We'll ask our resident constitutional expert.

Panther, does your proud constitution task local sheriffs with locking up the invading hoards?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

I'm not a legal expert or even close but I would think the local sheriffs would receive a request from the federal agency to apprehend subjects and then the feds collect them up from the lock up.

I see. How would this request apply in Sanctuary Cities, Leroy?

Upon which grounds would local sheriffs detain them? They would be breaching their own state laws by LOCKING THEM UP.

Also, if we are to believe your DL, we're talking over 20 million women, children and men of military age (and that's a conservative estimate, believe me, I mean everybody's saying that). Where will local sheriffs LOCK THEM UP?

I think this one calls for a multiple, don't you?

a) In the Paddy Wagon with the tweakers and shoplifters
b) In the local jailhouse with the creeps and perps
c) In the local football stadium, razor-wired and electrified to prevent escape
d) In the house used to film the top-rating series, Celebrity Apprentice
e) In specially constructed maximum security detention centres contracted out to Elon's friends

When you're done with that, you'll need to answer this: which laws should local sheriffs break to LOCK THEM UP?

a) Local Sanctuary City ordinances
b) Habeas Corpus, wrongful arrest and kidnapping laws
c) The old boy's Supremacy Clause
d) Various treaties and international human rights agreements
e) The Constitution

We're still awaiting Panther's advice on E, dear, but do feel free to share your response.

The incoming Trump official noted that the president-elect has put him in charge of the largest deportation effort ever planned and he intends to run some of that campaign right through Chicago.

“We’re going to start right here in Chicago, Illinois. If your Chicago mayor doesn’t want to help, he can step aside,” Homan warned. “But if he impedes us — if he knowingly harbors or conceals an illegal alien — I will prosecute him.”

Not complicated, paki.

Don't want to answer, eh?

Cunning. When you answer my question, wog, I might deign to answer yours.

Or I might just give you a yawn.

Either/or, no?

Oh? You had a question, paki?
Missed it among all that moronic grimacing and gibberish.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

FD

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 100010

Re: ►►► Local Sheriffs to Enforce Immigration Laws ◀◀◀
Reply #34 - Dec 30^th, 2024 at 5:42pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 30^th, 2024 at 5:05pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 30^th, 2024 at 11:30am:

The incoming Trump official noted that the president-elect has put him in charge of the largest deportation effort ever planned and he intends to run some of that campaign right through Chicago.

Did he clear that with Musk first? Cheesy

Hard to say, JS. Fwank, you see, disagrees with the very pwemise.

Rule of law, innit.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 54984
Gender: male

Re: ►►► Local Sheriffs to Enforce Immigration Laws ◀◀◀
Reply #35 - Dec 30^th, 2024 at 7:57pm

FD wrote on Dec 30^th, 2024 at 5:42pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 30^th, 2024 at 5:05pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 30^th, 2024 at 11:30am:

The incoming Trump official noted that the president-elect has put him in charge of the largest deportation effort ever planned and he intends to run some of that campaign right through Chicago.

Did he clear that with Musk first? Cheesy

Hard to say, JS. Fwank, you see, disagrees with the very pwemise.

Rule of law, innit.

Ten rupee give him...

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 54984
Gender: male

Re: ►►► Local Sheriffs to Enforce Immigration Laws ◀◀◀
Reply #36 - Jan 22^nd, 2025 at 1:25pm

“Mass deportation” is a propaganda term that does not describe the detention and removal plans of the new administration, and it is not used by Trump or his representatives.

In contrast, the Trump administration’s plans are targeted. The focus, as Trump and his representatives continue to stress, will be on persons who already have an order of removal against them and on illegal aliens who have committed crimes. At Trump’s October 2024 rally at Madison Square Garden, which the Left condemned for its allegedly racist and fascistic themes, he promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history to get the criminals out.”

More than 1 million people presently residing in the United States are subject to a final order of removal. These individuals include legal immigrants convicted of a crime who have lost their legal right to live here, others who violated their visa conditions, and illegal immigrants who were caught and brought before immigration courts. They have already gone through a process of review and appeal, and judges have ordered their deportation. The government knows who they are, and, as Homan explained, where they live. Arresting and removing this population is a matter of catching up on deferred adjudication. Its scale may be massive, but that doesn’t make it a “mass deportation.”

Activists and politicians may not want their constituencies to be deported. But the fact that illegal immigrants awaiting removal are here in large numbers is not a compelling argument not to deport them. Nor is deporting them a “mass” action in violation of due process. “Mass” is a term of art that the Left employs to deprecate legal action against favored groups. Proponents of public order shouldn’t use it.
https://www.city-journal.org/article/trump-mass-deportation-illegal-immigration

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 54984
Gender: male

Re: ►►► Local Sheriffs to Enforce Immigration Laws ◀◀◀
Reply #37 - Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 7:31am

Donald Trump’s promised crackdown on illegal migration is already biting across Asia, with India agreeing to take back potentially tens of thousands of citizens living unlawfully in the US, and authorities across the region on notice that refugee resettlements to America will be temporarily halted within days.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has reportedly agreed to the return of at least 18,000 illegal Indian migrants, and potentially many more yet to be identified, in the interests of avoiding a trade war and to maintain access to the H1B skilled migration visa program – of which Indian citizens account for close to 75 per cent.

Unemployment is on the rise in India; the jobless rate peaked at 9.2 per cent in June 2024 while youth joblessness was as high as 40 per cent. The Modi government has sought to address the issue through migration agreements with Japan, Saudi Arabia and Israel but can ill-afford to lose the lucrative skilled migration channel to the US – which in recent years has taken more than 200,000 Indians annually – should Mr Trump choose to target it as part of his migration crackdown.

Indians last year accounted for just 3 per cent of all unlawful crossings over US borders, though almost a quarter of all illegal crossings into the US from Canada were Indian citizens.

A 2024 Department of Homeland Security report cited by Bloomberg estimated 220,000 unauthorised Indian immigrants were living in the US as of 2022.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged