Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
There shouldn’t even be a voice to parliament! (Read 674 times)
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29281
Gender: male
There shouldn’t even be a voice to parliament!
Nov 14th, 2024 at 9:11pm
 
People voted no, but Labor in SA just ignored them and made their own instead. It isn’t going well…

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-14/sa-first-nations-voice-to-parliament-memb...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 17394
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: There shouldn’t even be a voice to parliament!
Reply #1 - Nov 14th, 2024 at 10:11pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 14th, 2024 at 9:11pm:
People voted no, but Labor in SA just ignored them and made their own instead. It isn’t going well…

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-14/sa-first-nations-voice-to-parliament-memb...


Funny like Trump winning! Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29281
Gender: male
Re: There shouldn’t even be a voice to parliament!
Reply #2 - Nov 15th, 2024 at 6:38am
 
Setanta wrote on Nov 14th, 2024 at 10:11pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 14th, 2024 at 9:11pm:
People voted no, but Labor in SA just ignored them and made their own instead. It isn’t going well…

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-14/sa-first-nations-voice-to-parliament-memb...


Funny like Trump winning! Cheesy


Just shows how little respect the Left have for the wishes of voters, especially in South Australia!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: There shouldn’t even be a voice to parliament!
Reply #3 - Nov 15th, 2024 at 7:51am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 14th, 2024 at 9:11pm:
People voted no, but Labor in SA just ignored them



people voted no to amending the constitution. In fact , the argument often used by the 'no' camp was that govt. could have a 'voice' ' without ammending the constitution. So thats exactly what SA has done.

Now you're whinging they did it without amending the constitution? Cheesy
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33661
Gender: male
Re: There shouldn’t even be a voice to parliament!
Reply #4 - Nov 15th, 2024 at 8:04am
 
John Smith wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 7:51am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 14th, 2024 at 9:11pm:
People voted no, but Labor in SA just ignored them



people voted no to amending the constitution. In fact , the argument often used by the 'no' camp was that govt. could have a 'voice' ' without ammending the constitution. So thats exactly what SA has done.

Now you're whinging they did it without amending the constitution? Cheesy


It was a NO to amending the Constitution and it was NO to any further bureaucratic bodies/ voices in Parliament.

What is it that you fail to understand that there are hundreds of representatives Aboriginal bodies that have the ear of Govt - plus a Minister of Aboriginal Australians and the NIAA as well as 11 MPs and Senators who are Aboriginals.

Like all aspects of the Aboriginal Industry and virtue signaling lefties like you… enough is never enough.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59426
Gender: male
Re: There shouldn’t even be a voice to parliament!
Reply #5 - Nov 15th, 2024 at 8:49am
 
Gnads wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 8:04am:
John Smith wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 7:51am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 14th, 2024 at 9:11pm:
People voted no, but Labor in SA just ignored them



people voted no to amending the constitution. In fact , the argument often used by the 'no' camp was that govt. could have a 'voice' ' without ammending the constitution. So thats exactly what SA has done.

Now you're whinging they did it without amending the constitution? Cheesy


It was a NO to amending the Constitution and it was NO to any further bureaucratic bodies/ voices in Parliament.

What is it that you fail to understand that there are hundreds of representatives Aboriginal bodies that have the ear of Govt - plus a Minister of Aboriginal Australians and the NIAA as well as 11 MPs and Senators who are Aboriginals.

Like all aspects of the Aboriginal Industry and virtue signaling lefties like you… enough is never enough.


The woke left will not take NO for an answer. By definition they have an unshakeable conviction that they know better what is best for everyone else.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Racist Filth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 90511
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: There shouldn’t even be a voice to parliament!
Reply #6 - Nov 15th, 2024 at 9:22am
 
John Smith wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 7:51am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 14th, 2024 at 9:11pm:
People voted no, but Labor in SA just ignored them



people voted no to amending the constitution. In fact , the argument often used by the 'no' camp was that govt. could have a 'voice' ' without ammending the constitution. So thats exactly what SA has done.

Now you're whinging they did it without amending the constitution? Cheesy


You left out - "with the approval of the people' - otherwise there is zero need for any representative body over and above what is already there and what all others have.

How much is this SA farce costing?  How many beaut salaries and perks are being handed out without reason?

Where are the results?

And all these Labor states wonder why they are being routed at elections.... they were told in NO uncertain terms - they chose to betray the Australian people and their democratic right to command and control government...... The Eternal Civil War Between People And Government that I discussed years ago.... who holds the right to rule??

As well as predicting the outcomes of all elections to date including Trump's but excluding the ACT (Gaga Strip - where I didn't bother to offer a view) - I predicted the Untergang of all the Labor states who persisted with this insanity .... and that AlboGov would be, like I predicted with AbbottCo - a watershed in Australian politics.

Now that the people have awoken - nothing will hold them back, although mass immigration of the Unknowing to dilute public thought/opinion is slowing things down (another of the hidden realities and reasons behind mass immigration of Outlanders) ...how does an Indian etc know what the true issues are for this nation .... all the people need is a true leader ....
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 15th, 2024 at 9:33am by Grappler Racist Filth »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 25606
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: There shouldn’t even be a voice to parliament!
Reply #7 - Nov 15th, 2024 at 9:46am
 
John Smith wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 7:51am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 14th, 2024 at 9:11pm:
People voted no, but Labor in SA just ignored them



people voted no to amending the constitution. In fact , the argument often used by the 'no' camp was that govt. could have a 'voice' ' without ammending the constitution. So thats exactly what SA has done.

Now you're whinging they did it without amending the constitution? Cheesy


When the Mabo decision was made in 1992, it was the beginning of the end to Free Rides. When Albanese declared that he was aboriginal, with his Voice to Free Rides, Australians decided overwhelmingly that the free rides had to end soon.

If we see anything with special privileges being given to indigenous Australians after the year 2028, I would be surprised. I don't want to be a 49 year old regional Qlder seeing 36 years of special privileges being given to people based on their heritage. My own daughter is of indigenous heritage. Why should she enter adulthood thinking that she has a job based on the heritage of her mother?
Back to top
 

At this stage...
WWW  
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: There shouldn’t even be a voice to parliament!
Reply #8 - Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:46am
 
Gnads wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 8:04am:
It was a NO to amending the Constitution and it was NO to any further bureaucratic bodies/ voices in Parliament.



really? your ballot had TWO questions? Or did you just make it up?
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 25606
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: There shouldn’t even be a voice to parliament!
Reply #9 - Nov 15th, 2024 at 3:07pm
 
John Smith wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:46am:
Gnads wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 8:04am:
It was a NO to amending the Constitution and it was NO to any further bureaucratic bodies/ voices in Parliament.



really? your ballot had TWO questions? Or did you just make it up?


I noticed two questions on the ballot paper.
Back to top
 

At this stage...
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grappler Racist Filth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 90511
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: There shouldn’t even be a voice to parliament!
Reply #10 - Nov 15th, 2024 at 3:09pm
 
Show us where in the Constitution there is a clause saying that if the people refuse to allow the government of the day at any level to alter The Constitution, the government of the day at any level can do so without the consent of the people....... and even attempt to do so piece by piece without consent of the people, in the hope that the people might not notice?

That, my son, is called a Coup.......... and We, the People are saying NO again... and again... and again ....

This organised NO group you speak of - their view that a government could do these things without altering the Constitution is their view - We, The People KNOW otherwise and we don't deal in mealy-mouthed weasel words, and nor do we fear 'offending' anyone. 

We, the People DEMAND and expect our right to vote on any and every such changes.  No vote - non passerons!

I figure that told 'em straight, Igor....


Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 25606
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: There shouldn’t even be a voice to parliament!
Reply #11 - Nov 15th, 2024 at 3:12pm
 
"A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?"

Question 1: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia?

Question 2: establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?

You could probably break the 'question' into three questions, if you wanted.
Back to top
 

At this stage...
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grappler Racist Filth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 90511
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: There shouldn’t even be a voice to parliament!
Reply #12 - Nov 15th, 2024 at 3:36pm
 
UnSubRocky wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 3:12pm:
"A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?"

Question 1: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia?

Question 2: establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?

You could probably break the 'question' into three questions, if you wanted.


So Albo failed to even gain recognition in the Constitution for the First Invaders ....  that's what happens when a politician tries to link two different things to sneak one through - both are rejected at once.

Voters only got one box to vote in - not one for each question - and people knew it was therefore rigged.

I've told you all countless times - Albo-ran sabotaged The Voice from the start, talking it down and even alerting the people that 'it would take a brave government indeed to reject any demand of such a voice'...... meaning that he KNEW, from the outset, that its 'limited advisory capacity' would never really be that, but would be continually expanded and empowered to do more and more until it over-ran government itself..... Aboriginal Supremacism... a desperate coup by a minority ..... and we the people saw right through it.

You know what's annoying?  Having to put a stop to the dorks pushing through the same things one bit at a time., and handing over 'sovereignty' over the demanded 'land, water and resources', the very basics of any nation and economy ... and so on indefinitely.. .... Aboriginal Supremacism.

We stopped 'em!!  The Battle Of The Bludge - now for the finish ...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 57065
Gender: male
Re: There shouldn’t even be a voice to parliament!
Reply #13 - Nov 15th, 2024 at 3:39pm
 
The Left/Media are getting desperate.
They've already had their Confederacy in America and Nazism in Germany fail.
Now soon, their Democrats in America and Gay France in Europe will fail.
All that will be left of them will be the Italian Mafia and the American Media's meddling in Politics.
The Right of Great British politics prevails around the world as the TRUE politics.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36398
Gender: female
Re: There shouldn’t even be a voice to parliament!
Reply #14 - Nov 16th, 2024 at 5:15am
 
Jasin wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 3:39pm:
The Left/Media are getting desperate.
They've already had their Confederacy in America and Nazism in Germany fail.
Now soon, their Democrats in America and Gay France in Europe will fail.
All that will be left of them will be the Italian Mafia and the American Media's meddling in Politics.
The Right of Great British politics prevails around the world as the TRUE politics.


I'm struggling to find the word that conveys just how bonkers you are.

Like, it's fruitier than just straight out delusional ... which you certainly are but that doesn't quite cover the enormity of it.

I'm on the fence as to whether or not it's full blown psychosis or even schizophrenia. It seems too fixed. Which brings me back to garden variety delusion.

Just offff with the pixies.

All i know, Jasin, you're only experience with the Psych "industry" (there is no 'e') is as a patient.

Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print