'international law' .............................

Never been the same since the United Nations took in all those countries that are anything but united with the rest.... as if somehow they had a right ...  Gaza should be part of the unity of mankind...... then when all these nasty little despotisms intent on genocides etc and the allies get a vote - what ho your 'international law' to keep the peace?

Working a charm at the moment, eh?  Must be the lack of personal responsibility from those leaders of those nasty little despotic nations....

Now Putin is inclusive. Tallowood excludes US culture. Putin includes Ukraine.

And you will keep diverting from principles of Putin. You and him are corrupt.

Grappler Racist Filth wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 1:43pm:


A developing concept, to free mankind from the consequences of neanderthal instincts still alive and kicking today.

Quote:


Poor graps, driven by neanderthal instincts, and incapable of understanding Doc Evatt's proposals to implement and enforce international law (requiring a UNSC without veto).

Quote:


Er- just as under national law (aka rule of law), you don't have a "right" to participate, you have a responsibility to participate; so under international law, states don't have a "right" to participate in international law, they have a responsibility to do so. 

Hence the principle of universal memberhip. 

Quote:


Wrong as usual; in fact Gaza shouldn't even exist, and if Evatt's vision for the UNSC had been adopted (no veto),  Gaza would have been part of a Palestinian state  established in 1947, as per UN res 181 (aka international law). 

Quote:
 

See above; people and states must abide by rule of law, under an adjudicator to keep the peace.

Quote:


No; it's lack of insight into anachronistic, unconscious (neanderthal) survival instincts which forced the veto into the UNSC, even in the age of MAD. 

chimera wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 6:28am:


1) Russia has long used the principle of openness towards all countries in its foreign policy. Those who wanted to interact with Russia were able to do so without hindrance. The West itself closed the door to relations with Russia.

2) Russia has also been using this principle in its foreign policy for a long time. It does not teach anyone how to live. It does not prescribe any form of government to any country.

3) Russia has long been calling for recognition of the right of countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America to participate in decisions concerning the fate of the world.

4) It is precisely because the West ignored this principle and Russia's security was ignored that there is now a war in Ukraine.

5) I would like to believe that this principle will someday be embodied in reality in this world.

6) As far as I understand, Russia always perceives its dialogue partners in any international interactions as equal sovereign actors.

Bias_2012 wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 8:06am:


I agree that in Russia they are carefully watching to make sure that no influential figure emerges who can compete with Putin. But who is killing Russian oppositionists is unknown. It could be either Putin or the West, in order to present Putin as a bloody maniac.

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 12:36pm:


Tell me please, did the NATO military bloc's approach to Russia's borders occur in accordance with the UN Charter?

Was the overthrow of Ukrainian President Yanukovych carried out in accordance with the UN Charter?

With their declining population, ethnically, Russians will be goners over the next few decades - as are the Han Chinese, so only a few more years left to put up with them.