Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print
suspect? (Read 1911 times)
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 15426
Armidale
Gender: male
suspect?
Nov 3rd, 2024 at 8:48am
 
It's possible that Jenny Hocking wrote a book (or didn't) about something. There are suspicions swirling around 1975, Eckhart and others. The book raises suggestions that may accuse one of the royal queens but the question is not easy to pin down. The book can be put down and Charteris should be also. This secret material is supplemented by hidden guesses. Don't ask.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17122
Gender: male
Re: suspect?
Reply #1 - Nov 3rd, 2024 at 8:49am
 
chimera wrote on Nov 3rd, 2024 at 8:48am:
It's possible that Jenny Hocking wrote a book (or didn't) about something. There are suspicions swirling around 1975, Eckhart and others. The book raises suggestions that may accuse one of the royal queens but the question is not easy to pin down. The book can be put down and Charteris should be also. This secret material is supplemented by hidden guesses. Don't ask.

Your assessment of a book you've never read.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 15426
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: suspect?
Reply #2 - Nov 3rd, 2024 at 9:25am
 
This is not a reply which doesn't mean what you think it is.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17122
Gender: male
Re: suspect?
Reply #3 - Nov 3rd, 2024 at 9:34am
 
chimera wrote on Nov 3rd, 2024 at 9:25am:
This is not a reply which doesn't mean what you think it is.

So, it is a reply which means what I don't think it is??
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 15426
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: suspect?
Reply #4 - Nov 3rd, 2024 at 9:39am
 
How do you know? Did you read between the lines?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17122
Gender: male
Re: suspect?
Reply #5 - Nov 3rd, 2024 at 9:41am
 
chimera wrote on Nov 3rd, 2024 at 9:39am:
How do you know? Did you read between the lines?

The trees of the earth are diamonds in the sky?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 15426
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: suspect?
Reply #6 - Nov 3rd, 2024 at 9:44am
 
Hocking never said that or at least suggested it or rather questioned a hint. Why?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17122
Gender: male
Re: suspect?
Reply #7 - Nov 3rd, 2024 at 9:54am
 
chimera wrote on Nov 3rd, 2024 at 9:44am:
Hocking never said that or at least suggested it or rather questioned a hint. Why?

Quote the text in Hocking's book that contradicts or does not support what I have written in the other thread.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 15426
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: suspect?
Reply #8 - Nov 3rd, 2024 at 9:58am
 
This post is blank and does NOT deny the absence of unknown secret non-existence.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17122
Gender: male
Re: suspect?
Reply #9 - Nov 3rd, 2024 at 10:02am
 
chimera wrote on Nov 3rd, 2024 at 9:58am:
This post is blank and does NOT deny the absence of unknown secret non-existence.

The sentence below is untrue.

The sentence above is true.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 15426
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: suspect?
Reply #10 - Nov 3rd, 2024 at 10:30am
 
That proves the opposite just as Hocking did because Kerr thought so, she believed, by suspecting what the book would argue or not, according to the latest naive suspicions.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17122
Gender: male
Re: suspect?
Reply #11 - Nov 3rd, 2024 at 10:37am
 
chimera wrote on Nov 3rd, 2024 at 10:30am:
That proves the opposite just as Hocking did because Kerr thought so, she believed, by suspecting what the book would argue or not, according to the latest naive suspicions.

Another assessment of yours, having never read the book.

Were you educated in mainland China?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 15426
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: suspect?
Reply #12 - Nov 3rd, 2024 at 10:46am
 
Me? I just watched 'Hocking and Kerr'.
https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1015980
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17122
Gender: male
Re: suspect?
Reply #13 - Nov 3rd, 2024 at 11:02am
 
chimera wrote on Nov 3rd, 2024 at 10:46am:
Me? I just watched 'Hocking and Kerr'.
https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1015980

Were you educated in mainland China?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 15426
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: suspect?
Reply #14 - Nov 3rd, 2024 at 11:28am
 
Yes we did China in history at school. The British established treaty ports in China after the First Opium War through the Treaty of Nanking in 1842. The treaty established five treaty ports in China.  The Queen had a secret port Jackson for convicts and republican whitlams and pick pockets. She flogged them, her memoirs and any mad theory in the trash novels of those dark days.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print