I Told You So!!

Ant Middleton is running for Mayor of London.... this'll be good...

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 15^th, 2025 at 1:03pm:


Will be interesting seeing as only 37% of inhabitants of London identify as white British - English, Scots, Irish and Welsh. 

That contrasts with 2001 when 71% identified as white British. 

Imagine what it will be like in another 20 years!   

Aquarius wrote on May 15^th, 2025 at 4:25pm:



The state treats expressions of majority nationalism as an existential threat in a way it doesn’t any other worldview, including Irish republicanism or even Islamism, and this explains the extraordinarily harsh way it polices online discourse on the Right. Would I have the deep-seated fairness to care about free speech if it was mainly leftists being punished? I’d like to think so, but I couldn’t be sure. True liberalism goes against our instincts, and requires a ruling class who consciously cultivate such a generous spirit.

The obviously political nature of the sentencing was reiterated at the appeal, where the prosecution lawyer interrogated the childminder about her political views, opening with the words ‘Mrs Connolly, I have some questions about something you posted on social media platform X’.

‘Do you accept that you hold strong views on immigration?’ he asked: ‘You believe this country is being invaded by immigrants.’ It’s unchecked and it’s a national security issue, she replied. ‘Is it fair to say you do not want immigrants in this country? Do you feel threatened by immigrants? You do want mass deportations?’ All of these framings she denied, and argued her case coherently.

The court was reminded of other tweets brought up at the trial to show her views, where ‘further racist remarks’ were noted. She had been accused of having a ‘racist mindset’ and ‘extended hatred of immigrants’, and these tweets gave ‘further insight into her racist views’. Perhaps she holds racist views, or perhaps she’s the kindest British person an African immigrant could meet; perhaps both are true, and people are complex. Either way, being in possession of racist views is not a crime.

Belief in a ‘two-tier’ justice has stuck since last summer, and with good reason. While Connolly was denied bail, Labour councillor Ricky Jones, who was filmed telling a real-life crowd that ‘We need to cut their throats and get rid of them’, is still a free man, on bail awaiting trial. Many have noted the extraordinary sentences handed out for online speech by judges who show leniency elsewhere, but then judges are constrained by sentencing guidelines and the laws passed by politicians.

It is true, however, that the arrest, trial and sentencing of Connolly was carried out in a feverish atmosphere. As Laurie Wastell wrote in the Spectator, three days into the disorder ‘the Prime Minister told the country that the unrest we were seeing was the work of “gang[s] of thugs” who had travelled to “a community that is not their own” to smash it up.’ Stating that the violence was ‘clearly whipped up online’, Starmer was ‘whipping up the police, Crown Prosecution Service and courts to hysteria, demanding convictions. And none of it was true.’

As her extraordinary sentence was handed down, Connolly’s judge had declared that ‘It is a strength of our society that it is both diverse and inclusive. There is always a very small minority of people who will seek an excuse to use violence and disorder causing injury, damage, loss and fear to wholly innocent members of the public and sentences for those who incite racial hatred and disharmony in our society are intended to both punish and deter ‘

That is certainly true, although one might wonder if a society can be strengthened by being diverse and inclusive if that entails incredibly draconian punishments to deter ‘hatred and disharmony’. That rather sounds like a weakness – it certainly is to the British citizens who find themselves sent to prison for words written in anger.



Read the whole thing
https://www.edwest.co.uk/p/the-troubling-case-of-lucy-connolly

The bad news is that, as Betz says, in Britain and much of Europe civil war is now inevitable.

The good news is that the class that consciously chose to destroy their "eminently civilised societies" will lose.

Today marks the first anniversary of the slaughter at Southport - at one of those summer-resort activities you sign your kids up for, with nary a thought. In this case, it was a Taylor Swift dance-class, from which three little girls never came home: Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine years old; Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven; and Bebe King six. As Lucy Connolly could tell us if she weren't rotting in Starmer's Lubyanka, nothing is more traumatising than the death of a child. So we remember Alice, Elsie and Bebe even as Britain's "mainstream" media has chosen mostly to memory-hole them, their short lives being unhelpful to the official Ofcom-enforced narrative.

Yet, as Laura Perrins reminds us, in Southport there were many other victims, who will live with their wounds till the day they die:

One girl who a Police Officer thought was dead when he arrived at the scene, was stabbed 30 times.

At the time, I quoted this Tweeter's summation of the soi-disant United Kingdom:
#UK the British police wasted hours interrogating #TommyRobinson under the “terror act” while someone actually planned a terror attack and was able to carry it out ‼️🙄
#Southport
https://x.com/Lillyin_London/status/1817904462754627846

Terrorism? Oh, don't be such a drama queen. As the Merseyside Constabulary and their BBC stenographers assured us within moments, there was as usual no terrorism to see here:

The attack was not terror-related, police said.

Oh, thank goodness for that. Three months later, Starmer's police state graciously permitted the public to learn very belatedly that at the alleged perpetrator's home they had found enough ricin to kill thousands of people, as well as a copy of something bearing the title The Al-Qaeda Training Manual.

No doubt, under Ofcom impartiality guidance, that isn't "terror-related", either. But, alas for the official narrative, at Merseyside Constabulary the duplicitous Chief Constable, Serena Kennedy, was forced to add a couple of charges under "Section 58 of the Terrorism Act 2000".

But don't worry: as I'm sure the BBC would tell us, the Terrorism Act 2000 isn't terrorism-related either.

Today is the first anniversary of the Southport carnage - July 29th 2024. When do you think the Merseyside plods found the ricin and the al-Qaeda manual? That afternoon? Late afternoon/early evening? The following morning? July 31st tops?

Yet they did not see fit to inform the public until October 31st. Notwithstanding Sir Robert Peel's founding principle that "the police are the public and the public are the police", for three months the police knew that the Southport killer was an industrial-scale ricin-manufacturing jihadist who attends mosque in prison, while the public was expected to stick to the official bollocks that he's a Welsh Christian choir-boy - or else Two-Tier Kier would fast-track you to gaol and drive you to suicide, as he did to Peter Lynch, whose blood is all over Starmer's thong, or whatever he wears when he's relaxing with his Ukrainian twinks.

Starmer lied. Serena Kennedy lied. To the court eunuchs of the media, Rudakubana is, laughably, "the Amazon killer". Nothing any Tweeter or Facebooker said about the motivations or origins of the mass murderer was as "misleading" as the official narrative. Unlike Sir Keir, his contemptible constabulary and his eunuch media, the killer is at least admirably honest:

It's a good thing those children are dead... I am so glad... I am so happy.

Lots of things have gotten worse in Britain this last year, not least for what remains of the nation's freedom of speech. The Online Safety Act came into force only on Friday, yet on its very first day it was being used to block video of English mums protesting sex-predators at migrant hotels. The British police are marking the first anniversary of Southport by seeking yet another investigation into Tommy Robinson. I sincerely hope the only reason Mr Robinson was at St Pancras was to board the next Eurostar and get the hell outta there.

And yet twelve months on, unlike the crackdowns after J6 and the Canadian truckers, the state did not succeed in cowing the masses. His Majesty and his evil prime minister may be willing to sacrifice your daughters to stabbers and sex-fiends, but signifcant numbers of the British people are not willing to go along with it. And resistance works: last week's protests in Epping have resulted in both the council and the Tory leader calling for the closure of the "migrant hotel"; last month's protests in Ballymena have resulted in two-thirds of the rapey community (in this case, the Roma) abandoning the town. Two-Tier can do his worst, but pushing back works.
https://www.steynonline.com/15493/state-as-liar

freediver wrote on Jul 29^th, 2025 at 2:28pm:



Oh, freed - get out more... the only reason Australia isn't in civil war is because we are - at the one time - both a timid lot in many ways when it comes to 'authority' (look at how Albo and his cohorts romp over us all), and a fair-minded lot who basically need to be punched in the snout to respond.

Why do you think all the 'land deals' take place behind closed doors and attack minority groups of Australians?  why do you think the Abos behave outside the law as a matter of 'right'?  Because they are at war with us while we think it's just a parlour game ands she'll be right as long as we don;t cross the 'authorities' and try to rectify anything ourselves - convict colonies and serfs are like that ... and every time one of them receives 'two tier justice' in any way or many ways - our Rights are being eroded and we are losing our country while we sleep.

You're better than that....