freediver wrote on Jul 30
th, 2024 at 5:56pm:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 30
th, 2024 at 1:28pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 30
th, 2024 at 1:16pm:
Quote:may have bloodied themselves to a stalemate
Is that the most optimistic outcome you could come up with?
They were all close to exhaustion as it was by 1917 - A typical European end to European hostilities in 1917 - 1918 would likely not have included harsh reparations on Germany, the more likely survival of Tsarist Russia. No Bolshevik revolution. No Nazism, no Holocaust, no WW2...
The boost that the US gave to Allied arrogance led to the Allies stomping on Germany causing the collapse of the central powers' monarchies, which evoked deep German / Austro-Hungarian resentment and the rise of fascist popularity within the former central powers.
It was the US arguing against harsh penalties for Germany.
What makes you so sure the central powers would not have won without US involvement? They mobilised 5 million out of about 60 million soldiers from both sides. US losses seem low, so presumably they were punching above their weight.
And what makes you think European monarchies and empires would have been a good outcome for freedom?
You mean, what makes me so sure the Allied powers would not have won without US involvement?
Nothing... We're into counterfactuals here.
The US provided fresh troops, economic support, a morale boost and technological and industrial strength,
The Allies may have won or, more likely, the war would have ended in a stalemate which would likely have ended the war by a more balanced negotiation.
The Allied powers' overreach in the pillaging of the central powers' treasure in war reparations caused the collapse of their economies; the loss of their territorial integrity and the overnight destruction of their governments which ultimately led to the rise of extremist governments in Europe - particularly Nazism in Germany.
It was not for no reason that the Austrians ecstatically welcomed the Anschluss in 1938.
Americans' naivety in their concept of forcing democracy on peoples that had never known it. nor fought for it, likely caused them to believe that the collapse of central European monarchies overnight would lead directly to the creation of stable democracies across Europe - this naivety was echoed decades later in Iraq and Afghanistan.