Quote:


You have given up any pretence of reading what you are quoting.

No John, but they do make it clear that they do not deliberately target civilians. They would very rarely stop to identify whether or not the people they are shooting at belong to Hamas. That's not how war works, and only a moron (or someone eager to spread lies about Jews) would base their argument on the expectation that they do.

Quote:


No John. I think what you said is entirely moronic. That you think the absence of a direct quote from the IDF in the article, saying exactly what you demand they say, proves anything shows that you are either very easily confused or eager to spread lies about Jews. I still can't figure out which. They made it clear enough that they are not deliberately targeting civilians, but your hatred of Jews is so strong that you managed to twist it around into almost the exact opposite of what they said.

freediver wrote on Jun 18^th, 2025 at 10:11am:


What part of what I said do you disagree with?

And please try to stick to what I said and not what the voices in your head said.


freediver wrote on Jun 18^th, 2025 at 10:11am:


I haven't said it proves anything Feeling guilty are you fd?

freediver wrote on Jun 17^th, 2025 at 10:46am:


It's remarkable, isn't it?

When Israel wants to strike a specific apartment nearly 2,000 kilometres away in Iran to take out a single military figure, it can land that missile with surgical precision. Yet when it comes to Gaza, just a few kilometres from its own border, suddenly, the precision evaporates and entire city blocks are levelled. Over and over again, the excuse is that "Hamas is hiding among civilians," as though that justifies flattening neighbourhoods.

But it feels like, even with that example, unless they can be quoted saying they've been deliberatly targeting civilians, you'll dismiss it huh FD?

Meanwhile, Israeli civilians are filmed in tears when Iranian rockets strike near homes or schools, sometimes near actual military targets like Iron Dome batteries or the Kirya itself, the IDF's central command embedded deep within Tel Aviv's civilian sprawl. Israel demands sympathy when its own military is embedded in populated areas, yet shows none when it accuses others of the same.

This is the hypocrisy: they bombed Iran, as Hamas bombed Israel. Then Iran fired back, as Israel did to Gaza. In every case, civilians were killed, and somehow, only some of those deaths are treated as morally outrageous.

And the online discourse? It's now teeming with voices condemning Iranian strikes as barbaric, some of the same people who were silent, or worse, cheering, when Gazan children were buried in rubble. Where was their outrage then? When the victims weren't Jewish or white? When they were Palestinian or Iranian?

You can't cherry-pick your humanity. If killing civilians is wrong when it happens in Tel Aviv, then it's wrong in Rafah and Tehran too. Selective empathy isn't just a moral failing, it exposes the racialised double standards that have polluted this entire conversation.

I'm sick of the civilian casualties that are happening in Gaza, Iran and Israel.

But I'm just some chump on the internet, I have no solution but I wish I could stop it.

And we can't even learn from it.  People will not accept the truth about why Iran restarted their nuclear program.

The whole situation is an absolute quagmire, so deeply politicised that having a rational, honest conversation about it feels like an exercise in futility.

And the worst part? Expressing any concern for innocent civilians or simply acknowledging the complex realities behind recent hostilities too often results in being branded antisemitic or accused of supporting terrorism.

This weaponisation of discourse shuts down nuance and stifles any meaningful dialogue, turning what should be a human tragedy into a toxic battleground of ideological posturing.

It's exactly this kind of toxic environment that makes progress and understanding virtually impossible.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jun 18^th, 2025 at 2:40pm:


Are you claiming that in order to prove they are not deliberately targeting civilians, Israel should have brought as much destruction to Tehran in 3 days of conflict as it brought to the Gaza strip over more than half a century of conflict - with an enemy that was so close than any Muslim nutcase can, and frequently does, climb onto the roof of his parents apartment building to lob a cheap rocket over the border?

Am I missing something, or is your argument really that stupid?

I am sure Israel would be willing to level Tehran if that is what it takes to stop Iran nuking Israel.

Perhaps you should get your understanding of middle eastern conflict from a more reliable source than your gullible friends sharing idiotic memes on facebook.

Poor old marsupial has been swallowing Hamas propaganda.

Israel doesn't target civilians.

But hamas want as many dead as possible.
How many civilians have been allowed to shelter in the underground tunnels ( like where Londoners went during the blitz)

Imagine Churchill saying " no civilians in the underground tunnels".

Now go away and have a think about it