ProudKangaroo wrote on Mar 18
th, 2025 at 7:32am:
aquascoot wrote on Mar 18
th, 2025 at 6:54am:
I applaud the brave Ukrainians who spilt their blood to stop the wicked Russian invasion.
It became trench warfare 2 months in.
At this stage a deal should have been done.
Since then maybe a million have died for no situational change.
This waste of life and of infrastructure has been cheered on by keyboard warriors in the west.
The situational change is that without that, Russia would have taken over all of Ukraine leaving its people at the mercy of an authoritarian regime with a proven record of brutality. What then? Do we pretend that submission ensures peace rather than subjugation?
What was the "authoritarian regime with a proven record of brutality", after the USSR collapsed and Russia wanted to join the capitalist liberal democracies - but was spurned?
Quote:Your unwavering devotion to Trump has led you to parrot Kremlin propaganda, condemning Ukraine and the international community for daring to resist imperialist aggression.
The aggressor in Putin's eyes was/is American imperialism; indeed Trump wants Putin on side, so the US - seeking to maintain global hegemony - can resist the rise of the much more capable competitor that is China.
Quote: It’s a perverse inversion of reality, one that conveniently absolves the true aggressor while maligning those who defend themselves.
Did you ever answer the question: who was the "aggressor" in the Cold War?
(I see Monk merely dismisses the question, not wanting to consider the competing ideologies behind the Cold War which remain a factor in the causation of the current coflict, despite the apparent resolution of the Cold War (when the USSR collapsed): there are a number of Russian speaking areas within the current Ukrainian borders (hence Trump's acknowledgement of the "very compex issues" involved in getting a deal).
Quote:What happens when their so-called "peace deal" expires?
A good deal between Trump and Putin won't expire, and Ukraine will be more internally stable if it lets go of the Russian speaking provinces.
Quote:....the predictable consequence of appeasement?
On "appeasement": Trump wants a deal with Putin which rules out war between Ukraine and Russia, which is not "appeasement", since 5 Russian speaking provinces of Ukraine ought to belong to Russia.
If Hilter had not made the mistake of invading Poland, then Chamberland would be considered a peacemaker, not an appeaser. You keep saying what Russia will do in the future, without knowing what Trump's deal with Putin is.
Meanwhile, the killing goes on.