AusGeoff wrote on Apr 7
th, 2024 at 1:28pm:
Such a shift, he argued in front of the Wellington Philosophical Society,
would make use of early morning daylight for work and open up "a
long period of daylight leisure" in the evening "for cricket, gardening,
cycling or any other outdoor pursuit desired". As well as saving on
the use of artificial light, the switch would especially benefit "the
numerous classes who are obliged to work indoors all day, and who,
under existing arrangements, get a minimum of fresh air and sunshine".
Yeah, great. The Ashes were played in England last year. They would break for stumps at 6pm each day. The extended play would be 30 minutes over time. And They might go on to 7:30 if there had been a prolonged rain delay. But, London is further north than Invercargill is south of the Equator. London's sunsets are around 9:20pm -- assuming that this accounts for DLS time -- making it 8:20 normal time. Given the late sunset, it should be reasonable to keep playing a game of test cricket until 7:30 in the evening, to take advantage of the light and the possibility of rain delays being countered early.
Being a Rockhamptonite, I spend most of my summer days indoors until the afternoon when it cools down with the angle of the sunlight being close to the horizon. Try mowing your lawn at 2pm in the tropical region. You really wear yourself out after half and hour. But, 4pm onwards and you are doing pretty well. If I had to wait an extra hour to mow the lawn, I would likely be using up more power on my fans trying to keep cool. And after work, the fans would be kept on for longer. Likewise for people that use airconditioning. They are more likely to switch the airconditioning on earlier and leave them on until whatever time they usually switch off at a night.
I wonder how DLS advocates cope during the winter. Oops, can't go outside to exercise, the sun sets earlier. ???