Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
H H Lamb - Climate scientist -old paper MWP (Read 811 times)
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 57956
Gender: male
Re: H H Lamb - Climate scientist -old paper MWP
Reply #15 - Apr 4th, 2024 at 10:02pm
 
lee wrote on Apr 4th, 2024 at 3:42pm:
JM Again.

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 4th, 2024 at 7:10am:
This is what I thought was meant—the instrumental record of 20th century and early 21st century warming is incontrovertible.


And it is not necessarily any or all AGW. Roll Eyes

Just think UK Met nearly 8 out of 10 stations in  the junk class (Class 4 and Class 5).

Australia's ACORN SAT has also been found to be out of whack and can't be relied on.

The same applies to the US ClimDiv Station data.

USCRN stations are sited away from UHI and other incompatible sources. NOAA uses ClimDiv. Who knew? Roll Eyes


How's it out of whack?
What's happened to it?
Did they stuff up everything before it went into orbit?
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21502
Gender: male
Re: H H Lamb - Climate scientist -old paper MWP
Reply #16 - Apr 5th, 2024 at 3:06pm
 
JM again -

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 5th, 2024 at 2:25pm:
He is known to fudge data!


As is the Acorn SAT temperature series.

lee wrote on May 7th, 2023 at 7:42pm:
" Some such details are provided in Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research (CAWCR) technical reports (e.g. use of 40 best-correlated sites for adjustments, thresholds for adjustment, and so on); however, the Forum
concluded that it is likely to remain the case that several choices within the adjustment process remain a matter of expert judgment and appropriate disciplinary knowledge."

If it can't be replicated it can't be science. Expert judgment is not replicable.

"Reason for adjustment Maximum temperature Minimum temperature
Statistical                             209                                   244
Site moves (all)                    176                                   170
Screen change or condition   79                                     77
Site condition (without move)   9                                       5
Observation time change         2                                     24
Total                                     450                                    491
Table 7 ACORN-SAT version 2 adjustments by cause. Totals do not add as some adjustments have multiple causes. "

http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/change/acorn-sat/documents/BRR-032.pdf

Statistics can't tell us what the temperature was at a site yesterday, let alone on a day 100 years ago.


Some people just can't be told. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print