Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Oct 22
nd, 2024 at 6:43pm:
Someone put it nicely - it's not the rain keeping people away from what was once a thriving tourist attraction - it's the second class treatment and even abuse, attacks and vandalism they cop.
Face it - this artificially contrived using public money 'business' has failed. Any ordinary business would be in receivership by now - instead of copping more funding out of treasury.
Anything set in place in opposition to public interest, using law or regulation etc, is a use of lawfare... something made instantly worse by having entire government bodies to support one side of the question in the event of any challenge to it. That's called despotism using law and rules set up by law to enforce the will of government over the people = governmental lawfare.
There are many categories and sub-categories of lawfare..... stop being silly and just accept it as is....
Lawfare is the use of legal systems and institutions to damage or delegitimise an opponent, or to deter an individual's usage of their legal rights. The definition is pretty clear cut.
Rain impacting tourism at Uluru, or your desperate attempts to stir the pot by ignoring the story and highlighting the bigoted comment you had to go search out since the original article offers no comment section, because of course, bigotry is all you’re interested in, has absolutely nothing to do with Lawfare, no matter how many mental gymnastics you try.
The only way this could possibly be considered Lawfare is by mutilating the definition the same way you’ve bastardised “The Voice,” “Apartheid,” and even “truth.”
Your insistence that everything from journos writing about their holidays at Uluru to Coroner's reports on preventable deaths in custody—none of which remotely resemble Lawfare—just proves how far you’ll stretch reality to suit your warped agenda. You’ve polluted these threads with drivel, and at this point, it’s not even worth listing examples because you’ll just pretend not to see them anyway.
Let’s not forget, this whole charade didn’t even start with Lawfare. It started with you redefining "The Voice" and then claiming all these examples that fit your newly defined "The Voice" proves it's being “implemented by stealth”.
Yet another term you’ve twisted beyond recognition.
Most of the interaction you get from people is because you’re lying through your teeth or spewing misinformation. If you stopped, maybe we could get to actual discussions about real issues—but you’d probably oppose those anyway.
And looking at the garbage you offer as “solutions,” like your nonsensical hand-drawn maps and barely veiled “jokes” about segregation and genocide, even if you did stop lying, there’s still an uphill battle.
Because once people sift through the filth you post, they’re left with nothing but the hollow, venomous void you call “thought.”
Forum
Pages: 
