Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Oct 7^th, 2024 at 10:21am:


You are now 0 for 2.

You’ve been presented with yet another opportunity to offer your insights, but once again, you’ve elected to let it pass through to the keeper without engagement.

Let’s examine the situation in more detail.

You’ve initiated several threads outlining what you perceive as examples of "lawfare," attempting to circumvent the outcome of the referendum and implement the Voice to Parliament covertly.

The volume of these purported instances is so extensive that you've categorised them into separate threads based on states and territories.

Your claims of impartiality and merely sharing news are inconsistent with the clear intent of these threads, which are designed to expose what you personally regard as lawfare.

Moreover, you impose a demand on others engaging in these discussions to provide their views on resolving the issues you highlight. Yet, you conspicuously avoid doing so yourself.

This reluctance exists against the backdrop of your past proposals, which have invoked comparisons to policies resembling genocide, apartheid, a new Stolen Generation, and the segregation of Indigenous Australians into what you envisioned as hermetically sealed, zoo-like enclosures, complete with hunting licenses sold to the wealthy.

Thus, we are left with two critical points, both undermined by your own actions.

First, you are not merely sharing news; you are actively promoting your opinions, rendering the notion of "simply raising awareness" untenable.

Second, your claim to be acting out of compassion is fundamentally incompatible with your previously expressed views and desires concerning Indigenous Australians.

Therefore, for a third time, I ask: If you are to maintain the charade that you genuinely care for, at the very least, the women and children in these communities, and in light of the concerns raised in the latest article you’ve shared, which, incidentally, does not fit your own definition of lawfare, would you care to finally offer your thoughts on how the children at risk mentioned in this article might be assisted?

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Oct 7^th, 2024 at 11:40am:


0 for 3.

So how is this article even an example of that?

Well, I tried.

All you've done is prove this right,

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2024 at 1:21pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 7^th, 2024 at 12:23pm:


Indeed - you are very trying... and trying desperately to make some point...

Now then - about your segregationist aboriginal activists..... those Apartheidists.... those racists ...

I have no hate - I want them all to come into the fold in brotherly love ... and unlike some here - you know them in the mirror - I am not part of the problem but part of the solution in trying to get them on the right track instead of stomping around raising Cain and getting deeper into the mire under the tutelage of the false left like you .......

No hate in that.  You are an extremist and a fantasist.

What IS your problem with a cheese named after its creator?

"Edward William Coon (31 July 1871 – 12 January 1934) was an American produce merchant and cheesemaker, who patented a cheese-ripening process that eschewed pasteurization, instead retaining the live bacteria to produce a cheese that was said to be more easily digested and have a more attractive flavor."

Activists had no right whatsoever to impugn his good name. The cheese name had nothing to do with them.  The Poms can never re-plan their invasion... and so on and so forth.

I'm not going to argue every point with you.  Get on with solving their real problems... don't get all wound up over little things that mean nothing....  you'll blow a gasket and end up one of those zip tied - I didn't mention any group there... you had no right to include it ....

Now what else can I use to get you going?

Still going on about their demand for Apartheid as if it was someone else's call.

That ends it until you get your mind right, Flake.  Until you can accept that it was THEY who demanded segregation and apartheid, you will never progress.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 10^th, 2024 at 11:51am:



                 

Still won't accept that the Serial Invader activists demanded their own state, eh?  You also have a problem with literacy?

I don't talk big - I AM big.... you, of course, are a raver and a ranter and some form of lunatic.

Back to school until you work out who demanded a separate state, separate sovereignty, special rights, special seating in Parliament, special control over law as designed by them only, and the absolute right to do things 'their way' (whatever that means) while exercising control over land, water and resources of Australia..... and that I'm just being nice by agreeing with them and offering some solid ways to earn a dollar to self-sustain.... theme park.... Maverick style hunting ... secure plexiglass tunnels and lecco trains for the tourists to view in safety.... I even offered the possibility of establishing Gon'Mo in that state so as to provide a few incomes as guards and beagle handlers and such....

You are sooooo slow..... is it a planned thing or was your intellect strangled at birth?

Even you're not that stupid - get on with your class work...... champ!

Their demand was to be insulated from the Evil White Man's way - it's their right as paid consumers and voters, and they drove a long way to gather to make those points.