ANY unjust law is no law at all.... the LAW requires that all be treated equally - when that is clearly not the case, then the law concerned is no law at all.
Ah, yes - the fixed firmament of the stellae of 'law' - those things that are constantly changing and will be forever changed..... so YOU believe we MUST accept what is running now, but only if we are of a certain group in society ......... the same as the Aborigines accepted all those things before, ay ... all those things they claim drove and continue to drive them to demand a separate voice, etc, by any and all means??????
So it's all right for one special preferred group to demand change when they see wrong - but not any other ... and especially any group that sees real wrong in the first group's demands? So Hamas demands the exgerrmination of all Jews - Israel retaliates to mass murder, rape and degradation of others beyond human comprehension by swearing to exterminate Hamas.... but not the people who supported and created Hamas.
Back to your rock... Adolph Jozef Stalitler... the New Jews of Australia reject you...... the WACMAMOFFS - the White Anglo-Celtic Multi-generational Australian Men Over Forty Five ...... the Second Greatest Generation who built on the social changes wrought upon demand from those of The Greatest Generation who suffered and died, and sought a Better Way For All Equally until the sheila-dominated 'social scientists' got into the act in their Frankenstein Mengele Mode and started to label them knuckle-draggers and cave men - ending up with their being made into the most hated person in the land without every having been convicted of a single wrong......... The Deuce Decision component of Lawfare... and it all started when they threw away the rule book in order to 'protect' women - something they have never succeeded in because they has always attacked the wrong demographic(s). How could any person justify to and live with him or her self after doing to Deuce what has been done, on the empty basis on which it was done?
Can Lee look in a mirror without a whisper of conscience? Certainly for as long as the money and the 'kudos' remain at a maniacal level for such blatant abuse of law and of individuals and human and legal rights....
How do you justify your position when it's 76/81 - over 300 missing ........ 76/81 - over 300 missing ....... 76/81 - over 300 missing ....????
History will absolve me - it will hang you in Effigy (a small town in WA somewhere) and everywhere else...
Simple enough even for you....
"Lawfare is the use of legal systems and principles as a means to achieve a military, political, or economic goal." .... there ya go - you've managed to avoid too much waffle and actually get to the nub ... there's hope for you yet .... so ...... errrrr... where is your justification for all this one-sided Lawfare to push for political and economic goals for only one side by exclusion of the rest .... let alone the military goals of a 'resistance movement' attacking property etc ...... Mau Mau style....????
**man - THAT Mau Mau at the door below missed out! They got the other one, too... but you know what? They were both mature ladies in their forties .... they and their terrier put the Mau Mau to flight.... and some to death.... home invaders beware!!
Now that's a GOOD Mau Mau!!