Lawfare - the extension of war by other means - i.e. abuse of law.

Now lessee .......  Native Title offers, according to the Federal court:-

The Commonwealth Native Title Act sets out how native title rights are to be recognised and protected.

.  does not apply to any land used by the government or any freehold land that's been bought by citizens.

.  it applies to Aboriginal land or unallocated state land, areas of cultural significance, National parks, state forests and reserves.

.  non-exclusive rights to areas

. recognised as holding non-exclusive native title, that means that the rights are exercisable subject to the laws of the state and the Commonwealth.

. can't prohibit people from going places, they can't stop people going onto beaches. Native title isn't a grant of land, it's a recognition of rights.

Lessee now:-

THIS lot - well... just look below - it's all there... as for this being part of The Voice By Stealth .... it's an attempt to twist and distort an existing law so as to give what that Voice would have handed over.... total possession of ALL that land, including freehold land held by others.   So lessee again.... they're not going directly after the FREEHOLD lands..... just grabbing everything else so that living there is non-viable.... and who's going to buy that from them when they are forced out?  Now then - this prohibiting people from free use and access to their own homes and going places freely and sharing use ..... nah - this can't be handed over - EVER.... not under 'native title' or the Native LAND Act (note the difference?)!  They've got their share of freehold for free.. enough to live on ad enjoy peace and quiet ....  stuff 'em!

Enough is enough.... stuff 'em!  Someone will....

You can be as blind and stupid as you like, Sacka..... one day it will all be yours...... YOU drink it!

So you've taken a "No" vote on the referendum not to mean that the concept of a constitutionally enshrined voice for Indigenous Australians to parliament was shot down, but instead that nothing can be done to assist them, even by legal methods, government policy or charitable efforts, for all time in perpetuity?

You cite in these various threads, anything done to help them, or even examples of people demanding change when they die in custody, as "lawfare".

You're not even sticking to a consistent point, you're just trying to shoehorn any news about Indigenous Australians into your obsession and use that to justify them getting unfair treatment making you the victim.

We've been through this already...

You're not fooling anyone and just making yourself look like a moron.

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Jun 26^th, 2024 at 9:15pm:


Interesting, so we are back to your refusal to articulate what you think the voice is.

There is a difference between what the voice was proposed to be, that is, an advisory body designed to give Indigenous Australians a greater role in the legislative process by providing them with a formal mechanism to advise the Australian Parliament and government on policies and issues that affect their communities, vs what the outcomes of that advice would be in terms of benefits to Indigenous people it could help achieve.

We voted No to the advisory group, not No to ever helping Indigenous Australians ever again, for all time, in perpetuity.

This whole time you've been claiming you were against what the voice was, but now it's clear you've let your mask slip and this whole time you didn't want what it was to achieve, in helping Indigenous Australians, to come to fruition.

Unless you want to clear the air and correct the record, this is a rather shocking admission.

Shocking as in it is a terrible position to hold, but it is of absolutely zero surprise you hold it, no shock there.

Jovial Monk wrote on Jun 27^th, 2024 at 7:41am:


Thank you, Herr Goering.... clearly you need to stay off what it is you're on - the Voice FAILED - the States are sneaking in every part of it behind the voter's backs.

**coughs** even you can see that these are two separate issues and two separate thrusts to divide and give inequalities in this country.

Grow up....... I can't re-train idjits every five minutes - I have whales to watch and such... books to write.... people to preach to about life, law and equality.... do some work for yourselves and getchu heads outchu asses!

Brisbane!!            

You ARE sitting in some padded spot paid to push this BS as instructed to blindly follow by complete idiots bent on subjugation of the general populace by chopping away at the Tree of Democracy one axe bite at a time!!!

You ARE a sheila!! That's how sheilas and dictators think!! There is only one thing worse than Queensland Labor, love - their Opposition... but what choice do the real people there have?

This gets better by the day..... QUEENSLAND!  BRISBANE no less!  Splendid isolation from reality!!

Easy trip to Fraser Island..... just use the expense account... plenty more where that came from!!  Give us your full recorded and supported by video and audio report of your discussions with the freeholders living there and wanting to live in peace.

What's your next twist and turn?  No balls for the trip there?  It's just up the road apiece - you could get the pulse of the real people on the ground for a change - you know - The Forgotten/Deliberately Overlooked STAKEHOLDERS!?!

When are you starting the trip to reality?

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Jun 27^th, 2024 at 12:39pm:


I think I broke him...

Are you ok?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jun 26^th, 2024 at 7:40pm:


You as a moron have no right to call anyone else a moron.

Gnads wrote on Jun 28^th, 2024 at 6:45pm:


No visit to Fraser Island to persuade the majority of Freeholders there that they should meekly surrender their rights to free movement/shared usager over their and everyone else's National Park?  No move to take a democratic vote of the Stakeholders/Freeholders on Fraser Island to see what THEY want?  .... (distant thunder) ..... Where's the list of the 'lies' I've told?

Oh - and BTW - Aborigines die at a lower rate in 'custody' than they do in their own communities, and at a slightly lower rate than all others while in custody..... if they are more represented in custody - talk it over with their elders and enforce some real change in their culture and attitude. Let's not forget the 76/81 ......... 76/81 ...... 76/81 .... and over 300 'missing' - not many of whom ever made it to a city or elsewhere and if they did - how would they live?  On the streets?  **coughs** I've KNOWN such some women living in cities - they live by selling their bodies ... what are their choices - those few who actually get out of the 'culcha' of death?

Again - putting all the data in one place in preparation for a full review is nothing like what you try to paint it as.... and you are clearly terrified by such a thing happening at all... too much information available to the public is a bad thing, ay?

I'll be pruning it and organising it and writing it all down soon enough ... you mark my words.

Now - get thee to Fraser Island - go - tell those Freeholder Majority Stakeholders that they are about to be shoe-horned into access only to their own lots, making their rights to live there untenable..... Lawfare at its very worst..... and you ARE the problem - not the solution... have the guts to go and face them when you tell them what your ideologists are going to do to them.

150 or so people at a time so nobody notices, eh?

WRONG!!  NOTED!

How I love arguing with fools........