freediver wrote on Apr 6
th, 2024 at 12:04pm:
Quote:Your crippled brain in operation; that's not what I said.
It is how you behave.
How is what I said different to how I behave?
I pointed to internal and external factors for China's slowdown, and
I am 'behaving' in such as way as to point this reality out to you (via these posts)
Quote: And by a dramatic coincidence, also how the CCP behaves. They never publicly acknowledged that Mao made a mistake, despite tens of millions of deaths - until Mao died. Then Mao was to blame and "the leader is not the party".
The subject is the current slow-down in China.
Indeed
Deng acknowledged that the CCP will only survive if the people become prosperous, hence his pragmatic policy change to 'opening up' via introduction of free markets, taking into account the economic circumstances.
Did Mao have to die before the policy change could happen? Possibly.
"In September 1976, after Chairman Mao Zedong's death, the People's Republic of China was left with no central authority figure, either symbolically or administratively. The Gang of Four was purged, but new Chairman Hua Guofeng insisted on continuing Maoist policies."...until Deng out-manouvered Guofeng, and was elected president by the CCP:
"Deng Xiaoping (22 August 1904 – 19 February 1997) was a Chinese revolutionary and statesman who served as the paramount leader of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from December 1978 to November 1989.Just like the Abbott-Turnbull-Morrison episode, the public had no direct say in the deopsition of the first two.
Quote:For everything else that has gone wrong since then, either someone else is to blame (economic downturn since 2015), or it did not even happen and you will go to jail if you say it did (lies about covid, Tiananmen square etc).
Not what I said - oh dear, your crippled brain...
Internal free market failures, and external geopolitical factors are to blame for the post-2015 slowdown.
Quote:Can you honestly not see the pattern in this behaviour?
No, because - like your delusional "inalienable rights"- your postulated "pattern" doesn't exist, as I explained above.
Quote:And the dangers of allowing an institution responsible for tens of millions of deaths, and which never allows the light of justice to shine upon itself, to continue ruling?
You mean... like US hegemony, under which as many people have died in wars since WW2 as died in that war itself?