Australian Politics Forum - "Racism" is a social construct without evidence

Back to OzPolitic.com

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › Member Run Boards › Multiculturalism and Race › "Racism" is a social construct without evidence

(Moderator: miketrees)

‹ No Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19

Send Topic

Print

"Racism" is a social construct without evidence (Read 21532 times)

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 52642
Gender: male

male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #240 - Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 1:37pm

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 1:31pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 11:29pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 11:23pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 11:06pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 12:40pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 12:24pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 12:15pm:

Racism has no scientific basis.

Nor does literature, art, friendship, philosophy, oral history, Dreamtime myths, welcome to country, culture, customs, political and religious world views, sharing law, belief in the Koran, in woodo, etc, etc. A lot of human interactions and sense-making of the world and each other have no scientific basis.

Racism has no Scientific basis. QED. Run along, Soren, back under your rock. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

You say you worked, studied, served with Muslims, cockwomble.
Was ANY of that on a scientific basis? Was your relationship with them and all your other personal encounters on a scientific basis?
Please explain the scientific basis of your relationships, cockwomble, whether with Muslims of otherwise. Is there a scientific basis of how you relate to people, Muslims and others?
This shouldn't be a difficult question for someone as highly educated as you.

I worked with Muslims on a scientific basis, occasionally on scientific projects, Soren. i socialised with Muslims on a non-scientific basis. That is far more than you have ever done, Soren. You'd cross the street rather than travel on the same footpath as a Muslim. Your Racism knows no bounds. Your Islamophobia knows no bounds. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Oh, well, they DID prove to be too difficult questions for you despite your highly educated self-image.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, you wouldn't know any science, Soren, afterall you're a Trick-Cyclist and we all know, they practice dark magic, rather than science. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Teach us, then. You are very educated.

Was your relationship with Muslims and all your other personal encounters on a scientific basis?
Please explain the scientific basis of your relationships, cockwomble, whether with Muslims of otherwise. Is there a scientific basis of how you relate to people, Muslims and others?
This shouldn't be a difficult question for someone as highly educated as you.

You see, I don't have any personal relationships based on science. But you obviously do. So I am asking what that is like.

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44632

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #241 - Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 4:55pm

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 1:37pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 1:31pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 11:29pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 11:23pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 11:06pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 12:40pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 12:24pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 12:15pm:

Racism has no scientific basis.

Nor does literature, art, friendship, philosophy, oral history, Dreamtime myths, welcome to country, culture, customs, political and religious world views, sharing law, belief in the Koran, in woodo, etc, etc. A lot of human interactions and sense-making of the world and each other have no scientific basis.

Racism has no Scientific basis. QED. Run along, Soren, back under your rock. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

You say you worked, studied, served with Muslims, cockwomble.
Was ANY of that on a scientific basis? Was your relationship with them and all your other personal encounters on a scientific basis?
Please explain the scientific basis of your relationships, cockwomble, whether with Muslims of otherwise. Is there a scientific basis of how you relate to people, Muslims and others?
This shouldn't be a difficult question for someone as highly educated as you.

I worked with Muslims on a scientific basis, occasionally on scientific projects, Soren. i socialised with Muslims on a non-scientific basis. That is far more than you have ever done, Soren. You'd cross the street rather than travel on the same footpath as a Muslim. Your Racism knows no bounds. Your Islamophobia knows no bounds. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Oh, well, they DID prove to be too difficult questions for you despite your highly educated self-image.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, you wouldn't know any science, Soren, afterall you're a Trick-Cyclist and we all know, they practice dark magic, rather than science. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Teach us, then. You are very educated.

Was your relationship with Muslims and all your other personal encounters on a scientific basis?
Please explain the scientific basis of your relationships, cockwomble, whether with Muslims of otherwise. Is there a scientific basis of how you relate to people, Muslims and others?
This shouldn't be a difficult question for someone as highly educated as you.

You see, I don't have any personal relationships based on science. But you obviously do. So I am asking what that is like.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, you wouldn't know any science, Soren, afterall you're a Trick-Cyclist and we all know, they practice dark magic, rather than science. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

WWW

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 52642 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #242 - Aug 4^th, 2025 at 9:48pm Chinese girl graduating from a Canadian university: https://x.com/creepydotorg/status/1952098847775420797
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 52642 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #243 - Aug 5^th, 2025 at 11:23pm Jasin wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 10:50pm: You have a gay stalker in Brian, Frank. He ain't shia, but. Explained: https://x.com/ArasUniverse/status/1950401210743476522 Scientifically.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 52642 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #244 - Aug 12^th, 2025 at 7:05pm Socially constructed choices are made: https://x.com/JebraFaushay/status/1949863328005701774
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Belgarion Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 5837 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #245 - Aug 13^th, 2025 at 9:35pm The inevitable result of multiculturalism explained. https://celina101.substack.com/p/racist-the-word-that-conquered-the?utm_source=s...
Back to top	"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Voltaire.....(possibly) IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 52642
Gender: male

male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #246 - Aug 14^th, 2025 at 2:56pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:02pm:

"Racism" is a social construct, something dreamed up by anthropologists to justify their classification of the various "racial" groups based on superficial differences in skin colour/eye shape/hair frizziness/nose shape/lip thickness/etc. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

She don't know that. She queen, mofo, you understand?

https://x.com/TheOnlyDSC/status/1955384612592734588

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 52642
Gender: male

male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #247 - Aug 14^th, 2025 at 11:13pm

Australia’s national broadcaster has been accused of hypocrisy for promoting “brown run clubs” for South Asian people while regularly demonising White Aussies who take part in similar activities.

In a video report posted on the taxpayer-funded ABC’s social media accounts on Wednesday, journalist Angelica Silva said that the run clubs were “on the rise across Australia” and that their goal was to help people of Indian subcontinental background “find a sense of community and promote a sense of belonging”.

The story featured interviews with members of Melbourne’s Melanin Run Club, with one man complaining he “grew up surrounded by people not from my ethnicity” and another woman saying “dealing with people the same as us [makes us] feel more comfortable”.

One regular who said he’d been a member of other run clubs said it was “nice to have one that is, I guess, closer to you”.

“It’s more about creating a space that everyone feels like they inherently belong,” he said, while founder Simran Nandan declared “it’s just a space where we can come and feel safe and connected and proud”.

But many Australians asked whether the ABC would take the same approach if the run clubs were for White Australians only.
https://www.noticer.news/abc-promotes-brown-run-clubs-australia/

Aptly explicit but unfortunate word association for Indians: "brown runs... " Grin

Grin

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 52642
Gender: male

male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #248 - Aug 15^th, 2025 at 6:36pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:02pm:

The title should actually be, "without scientific evidence" but forum limitations prevented me from being accurate. Genetically there is more differences between individuals than between various "racial" groups, "Racism" is a social construct, something dreamed up by anthropologists to justify their classification of the various "racial" groups based on superficial differences in skin colour/eye shape/hair frizziness/nose shape/lip thickness/etc. There are no major genetic differences between the various "races". Humans can all interbreed. The visible differences are because of environmental adaptation to conditions, nothing more. It does not denote anything major Genetically.

Genetics is the key, it is how we identify differences between groups of creatures, it is how we know a species is a species. There is only one human species, the homo homo sapiens and we are all members. Anything else is a social construct created by Racists. Eugenics is dead and buried. It was overturned by WWII and the destruction of the Nazi regime. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

So everything that is non-genetic about human beings IS a social construct? Is that your larger point?

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44632

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #249 - Aug 16^th, 2025 at 3:36pm

Frank wrote on Aug 15^th, 2025 at 6:36pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:02pm:

The title should actually be, "without scientific evidence" but forum limitations prevented me from being accurate. Genetically there is more differences between individuals than between various "racial" groups, "Racism" is a social construct, something dreamed up by anthropologists to justify their classification of the various "racial" groups based on superficial differences in skin colour/eye shape/hair frizziness/nose shape/lip thickness/etc. There are no major genetic differences between the various "races". Humans can all interbreed. The visible differences are because of environmental adaptation to conditions, nothing more. It does not denote anything major Genetically.

Genetics is the key, it is how we identify differences between groups of creatures, it is how we know a species is a species. There is only one human species, the homo homo sapiens and we are all members. Anything else is a social construct created by Racists. Eugenics is dead and buried. It was overturned by WWII and the destruction of the Nazi regime. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

So everything that is non-genetic about human beings IS a social construct? Is that your larger point?

Basically yes, Soren. Why do you need confirmation of this obvious fact? Are you so committed to Racism that you need it to be a real, scientifically based fact? DNA proves it to be false. We are all members of the human race, homo homo sapiens. You are related to the people you continually complain about. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

WWW

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 52642
Gender: male

male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #250 - Aug 16^th, 2025 at 3:54pm

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 3:36pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 15^th, 2025 at 6:36pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:02pm:

The title should actually be, "without scientific evidence" but forum limitations prevented me from being accurate. Genetically there is more differences between individuals than between various "racial" groups, "Racism" is a social construct, something dreamed up by anthropologists to justify their classification of the various "racial" groups based on superficial differences in skin colour/eye shape/hair frizziness/nose shape/lip thickness/etc. There are no major genetic differences between the various "races". Humans can all interbreed. The visible differences are because of environmental adaptation to conditions, nothing more. It does not denote anything major Genetically.

Genetics is the key, it is how we identify differences between groups of creatures, it is how we know a species is a species. There is only one human species, the homo homo sapiens and we are all members. Anything else is a social construct created by Racists. Eugenics is dead and buried. It was overturned by WWII and the destruction of the Nazi regime. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

So everything that is non-genetic about human beings IS a social construct? Is that your larger point?

Basically yes, Soren.

So scientific evidence itself is a social construct as science is undetectable in DNA.

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44632

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #251 - Aug 16^th, 2025 at 5:04pm

Frank wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 3:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 3:36pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 15^th, 2025 at 6:36pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:02pm:

The title should actually be, "without scientific evidence" but forum limitations prevented me from being accurate. Genetically there is more differences between individuals than between various "racial" groups, "Racism" is a social construct, something dreamed up by anthropologists to justify their classification of the various "racial" groups based on superficial differences in skin colour/eye shape/hair frizziness/nose shape/lip thickness/etc. There are no major genetic differences between the various "races". Humans can all interbreed. The visible differences are because of environmental adaptation to conditions, nothing more. It does not denote anything major Genetically.

Genetics is the key, it is how we identify differences between groups of creatures, it is how we know a species is a species. There is only one human species, the homo homo sapiens and we are all members. Anything else is a social construct created by Racists. Eugenics is dead and buried. It was overturned by WWII and the destruction of the Nazi regime. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

So everything that is non-genetic about human beings IS a social construct? Is that your larger point?

Basically yes, Soren.

So scientific evidence itself is a social construct as science is undetectable in DNA.

You are really scrabbling around for things to try and criticise me on, aren't you, Soren? You're carrying this to ridiculous extremes. You have deliberately edited my post to remove the context by which I answered your original question. It was about Racism and about how it is a social construct. Something you refuse to admit to in your distorted belief that it exists outside of your social construct. What a shame you're wasting your time. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

WWW

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 52642
Gender: male

male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #252 - Aug 16^th, 2025 at 5:30pm

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 5:04pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 3:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 3:36pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 15^th, 2025 at 6:36pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:02pm:

The title should actually be, "without scientific evidence" but forum limitations prevented me from being accurate. Genetically there is more differences between individuals than between various "racial" groups, "Racism" is a social construct, something dreamed up by anthropologists to justify their classification of the various "racial" groups based on superficial differences in skin colour/eye shape/hair frizziness/nose shape/lip thickness/etc. There are no major genetic differences between the various "races". Humans can all interbreed. The visible differences are because of environmental adaptation to conditions, nothing more. It does not denote anything major Genetically.

Genetics is the key, it is how we identify differences between groups of creatures, it is how we know a species is a species. There is only one human species, the homo homo sapiens and we are all members. Anything else is a social construct created by Racists. Eugenics is dead and buried. It was overturned by WWII and the destruction of the Nazi regime. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

So everything that is non-genetic about human beings IS a social construct? Is that your larger point?

Basically yes, Soren.

So scientific evidence itself is a social construct as science is undetectable in DNA.

You are really scrabbling around for things to try and criticise me on, aren't you, Soren? You're carrying this to ridiculous extremes. You have deliberately edited my post to remove the context by which I answered your original question. It was about Racism and about how it is a social construct. Something you refuse to admit to in your distorted belief that it exists outside of your social construct. What a shame you're wasting your time. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

The point is simple: saying that something is a social construct does not invalidate ANYTHING. Science itself is a social construct.

I understand that you see yourself as an 'anti-racist'. Fine. But anti-racism is not any less a social construct than racism. So your reasons - no scientific basis- is pointless insofar as it is asserted exactly on the.same kind of socially constructed basis as racism.
You are opposing a socially constructed seance on a socially constructed basis while insisting that your stance is not socially constructed even though it evidently is.

« Last Edit: Aug 16^th, 2025 at 5:45pm by Frank »

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44632

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #253 - Aug 16^th, 2025 at 6:54pm

Frank wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 5:30pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 5:04pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 3:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 3:36pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 15^th, 2025 at 6:36pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:02pm:

The title should actually be, "without scientific evidence" but forum limitations prevented me from being accurate. Genetically there is more differences between individuals than between various "racial" groups, "Racism" is a social construct, something dreamed up by anthropologists to justify their classification of the various "racial" groups based on superficial differences in skin colour/eye shape/hair frizziness/nose shape/lip thickness/etc. There are no major genetic differences between the various "races". Humans can all interbreed. The visible differences are because of environmental adaptation to conditions, nothing more. It does not denote anything major Genetically.

Genetics is the key, it is how we identify differences between groups of creatures, it is how we know a species is a species. There is only one human species, the homo homo sapiens and we are all members. Anything else is a social construct created by Racists. Eugenics is dead and buried. It was overturned by WWII and the destruction of the Nazi regime. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

So everything that is non-genetic about human beings IS a social construct? Is that your larger point?

Basically yes, Soren.

So scientific evidence itself is a social construct as science is undetectable in DNA.

You are really scrabbling around for things to try and criticise me on, aren't you, Soren? You're carrying this to ridiculous extremes. You have deliberately edited my post to remove the context by which I answered your original question. It was about Racism and about how it is a social construct. Something you refuse to admit to in your distorted belief that it exists outside of your social construct. What a shame you're wasting your time. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

The point is simple: saying that something is a social construct does not invalidate ANYTHING. Science itself is a social construct.

I understand that you see yourself as an 'anti-racist'. Fine. But anti-racism is not any less a social construct than racism. So your reasons - no scientific basis- is pointless insofar as it is asserted exactly on the.same kind of socially constructed basis as racism.
You are opposing a socially constructed seance on a socially constructed basis while insisting that your stance is not socially constructed even though it evidently is.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, Soren you really are trying so hard to disprove what I've said, aren't you? In the context of Racism, the appeals made by many Racists that their belief in Racism has a scientific basis has been proved untrue because the Human Genome Project has shown that there is no difference between the various "Races" as Racists claim. Until you admit that, you're barking up the wrong tree with your beliefs. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

WWW

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 52642
Gender: male

male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #254 - Aug 16^th, 2025 at 8:58pm

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 6:54pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 5:30pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 5:04pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 3:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 3:36pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 15^th, 2025 at 6:36pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:02pm:

The title should actually be, "without scientific evidence" but forum limitations prevented me from being accurate. Genetically there is more differences between individuals than between various "racial" groups, "Racism" is a social construct, something dreamed up by anthropologists to justify their classification of the various "racial" groups based on superficial differences in skin colour/eye shape/hair frizziness/nose shape/lip thickness/etc. There are no major genetic differences between the various "races". Humans can all interbreed. The visible differences are because of environmental adaptation to conditions, nothing more. It does not denote anything major Genetically.

Genetics is the key, it is how we identify differences between groups of creatures, it is how we know a species is a species. There is only one human species, the homo homo sapiens and we are all members. Anything else is a social construct created by Racists. Eugenics is dead and buried. It was overturned by WWII and the destruction of the Nazi regime. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

So everything that is non-genetic about human beings IS a social construct? Is that your larger point?

Basically yes, Soren.

So scientific evidence itself is a social construct as science is undetectable in DNA.

You are really scrabbling around for things to try and criticise me on, aren't you, Soren? You're carrying this to ridiculous extremes. You have deliberately edited my post to remove the context by which I answered your original question. It was about Racism and about how it is a social construct. Something you refuse to admit to in your distorted belief that it exists outside of your social construct. What a shame you're wasting your time. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

The point is simple: saying that something is a social construct does not invalidate ANYTHING. Science itself is a social construct.

I understand that you see yourself as an 'anti-racist'. Fine. But anti-racism is not any less a social construct than racism. So your reasons - no scientific basis- is pointless insofar as it is asserted exactly on the.same kind of socially constructed basis as racism.
You are opposing a socially constructed seance on a socially constructed basis while insisting that your stance is not socially constructed even though it evidently is.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, Soren you really are trying so hard to disprove what I've said, aren't you? In the context of Racism, the appeals made by many Racists that their belief in Racism has a scientific basis has been proved untrue because the Human Genome Project has shown that there is no difference between the various "Races" as Racists claim. Until you admit that, you're barking up the wrong tree with your beliefs. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

The human genome project is not the only basis for the recognition of evident racial differences.

There are obvious differences between, say, people of Norway and people of Ghana. Just because they do not show up in DNA does NOT mean that Norwegians and Ghanaians are indistinguishable. They are very different elen as they could donate blood to each other. DNA doesn't much matter - the differences are instantly, readily perceived by everyone. No need for anyone DNA test.
Culture is not in the DNA yet it is central to interpersonal relations. DNA isn't.

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19

Send Topic

Print

‹ No Topic | Next Topic ›

Top of this page

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.

Valid XHTML

Valid CSS

Powered by Perl

Source Forge