thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 5^th, 2024 at 9:28am:



But.... but .... but... JEWS - 'rational' and 'non-rational' (a manifestation of your projecting your psychoses) - are not only the majority in Israel ... but they also legally OWN the whole place - not just have native title to wander about and catch a roo while themselves admitting they OWN no land at all and can't even build a home on it.... but still carrying on as if 'native title' allows them to turf anyone else off it.... there's your massive difference....

You see where I'm getting at you here???  And what I'm hinting at as a REAL solution to your delusions about Jews and
Aborigines???

Why are you confused about the value assigned to money?

Quote:


What if it is based on something other than your strawman?

The whole point of an intersubjective reality is that it becomes real because of the belief, regardless of what basis that belief has. Criticising the basis for the belief does not change the reality that comes from it. Just like complaining that money is invented "out of thin air" does not change the reality of its value. Would money suddenly become an illusion if people thought it's value came from God, aliens, magic, or clever paperwork? You are criticising your own (deliberate?) misunderstanding of what human rights are, nothing more.

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 3^rd, 2024 at 10:09pm:


A WOFTAM calling another WOFTAM a WOFTAM.

Just like a brown skinned man making a racial slur toward another brown skinned man. 

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 4^th, 2024 at 2:15pm:


And when they migrate to those Western Cultures they don't want to hold themselves to those high standards there either ..... they want to be allowed to turn the country they have migrated to into the same sort of country they fled.

And they are actively doing it all over the globe.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 4^th, 2024 at 3:12pm:


How about 160,000 ?

That's plenty .... considering there's nowhere for them to live.

Gnads wrote on Mar 5^th, 2024 at 11:07am:




160,000 is way too f_cking high

freediver wrote on Mar 5^th, 2024 at 10:03am:


Now we are getting somewhere: "Rights" based on something other than Classical Liberalism's delusional "natural individual rights" - whether a "strawman" or not, let's read on.

Quote:


Now you are separating concept from function; we already know the concept itself - "shared BELIEF" (according to you) - is flawed, so now you want to move on to consider what it's "point" is...ie what you want "shared belief"  to achieve. 


Quote:


There's your error; I insist on an examination of reality itself (as it affects interpersonal relationships), you insist on raising belief to the status of reality and proceeding from there.

I reject that non-rational approach. 

Quote:


Addressed and refuted above. Reality based on belief is irrational.

Quote:


I mentioned money because the public has no idea about its nature; the common belief that fiat currencies are bad because they are not based on the gold standard is an example of that flawed thinking/belief.

btw, I'm not complaining about the fact money is created out of thin air, I'm urging currency-issuing governments to reclaim that money-creation power from private money lenders who currently have the sole right to create money as debt.  Currency-issuing governments need to fund themselves, so they are not forced to beg for "taxpayer money". 

As for the "value" of fiat money,  it comes from the nation's real resources and productivity of the people. Not illusory.....unlike Bitcoin, a ponzi scheme; be ready for the next collapse in 'value' if you are an investor.

Quote:


No; but not seeing the reality would certainly result in  flawed economic policy...


Quote:


Refuted at the top of this post.