Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
So what is truth? Is truth unchanging law? (Read 2066 times)
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16339
Gender: male
Re: So what is truth? Is truth unchanging law?
Reply #15 - Feb 26th, 2024 at 8:04am
 
Yadda wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:51am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:22am:

What if I stole 'my stuff'?



Then that is proof, that there is a lot of A priori immoral circumstance in our human universe.

What if some of my stuff was stolen and some was not?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Moderator
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 41180
Gender: male
Re: So what is truth? Is truth unchanging law?
Reply #16 - Feb 26th, 2024 at 8:36am
 
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 6:05am:
Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 2:33am:
Nature is my truth

What do you mean by that?




Plants grow or otherwise according to the season and climate.
Tides come and go according to something. (Maybe even the moon!)
Trees grow, get old and sick, some die. Seasons change, things happen.
Animals grow, mate and have little ones, some of these do the same, some do not.

The world continually alters, this is seen in all nature. Even in our globe itself. Our planets wobble is erratic.
The span of a year is not always 365 days, they even have leap seconds at times.
It's not according to strict guidelines, it is not chaotic.
It's flexible, it's whatever works at that time at that place.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 55065
Gender: male
Re: So what is truth? Is truth unchanging law?
Reply #17 - Feb 26th, 2024 at 8:36am
 
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:48am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:46am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:20am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:15am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 6:03am:
Frank wrote on Feb 16th, 2024 at 10:51am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 16th, 2024 at 9:20am:
We both have truths. Are mine the same as yours? - Jesus Christ Superstar.

There is likely an unbridgeable chasm between absolute truth and doubt, with a convincing illusion of its apprehension possible by faith.

Is that true? Or is it a mere illusion?


Mathematical truths are absolute. Not to be confused with moral truths which are, by necessity/definition, contingent.

Mathematical truths are absolute only in that we agree their axioms are, e.g. 'there are no round squares'.




A priori statements, being independent of experience or observation, are not matters for agreement or disagreement.

Only a Bbwian would disagree with an a priori truth. Or greatdivide. Or Smiff.  Our in-house intellectuals. Tsk, tsk  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

When does a right triangle contain more than one 90-degree angle?


A triangle cannot have more than one angle of 90 degrees.


Unless you draw one on a sphere.

Not under the conditions I stated:

A triangle has 3 angles.
The three angles amount to 180 degrees.
A right angle is 90 degrees.



Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16339
Gender: male
Re: So what is truth? Is truth unchanging law?
Reply #18 - Feb 26th, 2024 at 8:57am
 
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 8:36am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:48am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:46am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:20am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:15am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 6:03am:
Frank wrote on Feb 16th, 2024 at 10:51am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 16th, 2024 at 9:20am:
We both have truths. Are mine the same as yours? - Jesus Christ Superstar.

There is likely an unbridgeable chasm between absolute truth and doubt, with a convincing illusion of its apprehension possible by faith.

Is that true? Or is it a mere illusion?


Mathematical truths are absolute. Not to be confused with moral truths which are, by necessity/definition, contingent.

Mathematical truths are absolute only in that we agree their axioms are, e.g. 'there are no round squares'.




A priori statements, being independent of experience or observation, are not matters for agreement or disagreement.

Only a Bbwian would disagree with an a priori truth. Or greatdivide. Or Smiff.  Our in-house intellectuals. Tsk, tsk  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

When does a right triangle contain more than one 90-degree angle?


A triangle cannot have more than one angle of 90 degrees.


Unless you draw one on a sphere.

Not under the conditions I stated:

A triangle has 3 angles.
The three angles amount to 180 degrees.
A right angle is 90 degrees.

So it is the definition of a triangle as a product of your mind, then.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 55065
Gender: male
Re: So what is truth? Is truth unchanging law?
Reply #19 - Feb 26th, 2024 at 9:13am
 
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 8:57am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 8:36am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:48am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:46am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:20am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:15am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 6:03am:
Frank wrote on Feb 16th, 2024 at 10:51am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 16th, 2024 at 9:20am:
We both have truths. Are mine the same as yours? - Jesus Christ Superstar.

There is likely an unbridgeable chasm between absolute truth and doubt, with a convincing illusion of its apprehension possible by faith.

Is that true? Or is it a mere illusion?


Mathematical truths are absolute. Not to be confused with moral truths which are, by necessity/definition, contingent.

Mathematical truths are absolute only in that we agree their axioms are, e.g. 'there are no round squares'.




A priori statements, being independent of experience or observation, are not matters for agreement or disagreement.

Only a Bbwian would disagree with an a priori truth. Or greatdivide. Or Smiff.  Our in-house intellectuals. Tsk, tsk  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

When does a right triangle contain more than one 90-degree angle?


A triangle cannot have more than one angle of 90 degrees.


Unless you draw one on a sphere.

Not under the conditions I stated:

A triangle has 3 angles.
The three angles amount to 180 degrees.
A right angle is 90 degrees.

So it is the definition of a triangle as a product of your mind, then.

You don't really think that.
You well know if 3 of ANYTHING is 180 and one of that 3 is 90 then the other two must be 90 when combined, therefore only 1 of that 3 can be 90.

There  is nothing in there that is a "product of my mind", Bbwian. Tsk, tsk   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Or shall I call you greatdivide? Smiff?

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16339
Gender: male
Re: So what is truth? Is truth unchanging law?
Reply #20 - Feb 26th, 2024 at 9:24am
 
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 9:13am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 8:57am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 8:36am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:48am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:46am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:20am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:15am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 6:03am:
Frank wrote on Feb 16th, 2024 at 10:51am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 16th, 2024 at 9:20am:
We both have truths. Are mine the same as yours? - Jesus Christ Superstar.

There is likely an unbridgeable chasm between absolute truth and doubt, with a convincing illusion of its apprehension possible by faith.

Is that true? Or is it a mere illusion?


Mathematical truths are absolute. Not to be confused with moral truths which are, by necessity/definition, contingent.

Mathematical truths are absolute only in that we agree their axioms are, e.g. 'there are no round squares'.




A priori statements, being independent of experience or observation, are not matters for agreement or disagreement.

Only a Bbwian would disagree with an a priori truth. Or greatdivide. Or Smiff.  Our in-house intellectuals. Tsk, tsk  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

When does a right triangle contain more than one 90-degree angle?


A triangle cannot have more than one angle of 90 degrees.


Unless you draw one on a sphere.

Not under the conditions I stated:

A triangle has 3 angles.
The three angles amount to 180 degrees.
A right angle is 90 degrees.

So it is the definition of a triangle as a product of your mind, then.

You don't really think that.
You well know if 3 of ANYTHING is 180 and one of that 3 is 90 then the other two must be 90 when combined, therefore only 1 of that 3 can be 90.

There  is nothing in there that is a "product of my mind", Bbwian. Tsk, tsk   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Or shall I call you greatdivide? Smiff?


You need to stop obsessing about Brian Ross...

Your mind doesn't extend to a triangle on a sphere where its angles can add to 270.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 55065
Gender: male
Re: So what is truth? Is truth unchanging law?
Reply #21 - Feb 26th, 2024 at 9:34am
 
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 9:24am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 9:13am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 8:57am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 8:36am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:48am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:46am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:20am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:15am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 6:03am:
Frank wrote on Feb 16th, 2024 at 10:51am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 16th, 2024 at 9:20am:
We both have truths. Are mine the same as yours? - Jesus Christ Superstar.

There is likely an unbridgeable chasm between absolute truth and doubt, with a convincing illusion of its apprehension possible by faith.

Is that true? Or is it a mere illusion?


Mathematical truths are absolute. Not to be confused with moral truths which are, by necessity/definition, contingent.

Mathematical truths are absolute only in that we agree their axioms are, e.g. 'there are no round squares'.




A priori statements, being independent of experience or observation, are not matters for agreement or disagreement.

Only a Bbwian would disagree with an a priori truth. Or greatdivide. Or Smiff.  Our in-house intellectuals. Tsk, tsk  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

When does a right triangle contain more than one 90-degree angle?


A triangle cannot have more than one angle of 90 degrees.


Unless you draw one on a sphere.

Not under the conditions I stated:

A triangle has 3 angles.
The three angles amount to 180 degrees.
A right angle is 90 degrees.

So it is the definition of a triangle as a product of your mind, then.

You don't really think that.
You well know if 3 of ANYTHING is 180 and one of that 3 is 90 then the other two must be 90 when combined, therefore only 1 of that 3 can be 90.

There  is nothing in there that is a "product of my mind", Bbwian. Tsk, tsk   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Or shall I call you greatdivide? Smiff?


You need to stop obsessing about Brian Ross...

Your mind doesn't extend to a triangle on a sphere where its angles can add to 270.

Not if we start with the axioms of what a triangle is, Bbwian.
A triangle has 3 angles.
The three angles amount to 180 degrees.
A right angle is 90 degrees.



If you start with a different set of axioms then you get a different set of deductions. Trying to be sneaky/shifty by introducing axioms not originally stated doesn't prove anything beyond shifty silliness, aka Bbwianesque.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 55065
Gender: male
Re: So what is truth? Is truth unchanging law?
Reply #22 - Feb 26th, 2024 at 9:43am
 
Axiom, in logic, an indemonstrable first principle, rule, or maxim, that has found general acceptance or is thought worthy of common acceptance whether by virtue of a claim to intrinsic merit or on the basis of an appeal to self-evidence.


Deduction, in logic, a rigorous proof, or derivation, of one statement (the conclusion) from one or more statements (the premises)—i.e., a chain of statements, each of which is either a premise or a consequence of a statement occurring earlier in the proof.


Inference, in logic, derivation of conclusions from given information or premises by any acceptable form of reasoning. Inferences are commonly drawn (1) by deduction, which, by analyzing valid argument forms, draws out the conclusions implicit in their premises, (2) by induction, which argues from many instances to a general statement, (3) by probability, which passes from frequencies within a known domain to conclusions of stated likelihood, and (4) by statistical reasoning, which concludes that, on the average, a certain percentage of a set of entities will satisfy the stated conditions.


Reason, in philosophy, the faculty or process of drawing logical inferences. The term “reason” is also used in several other, narrower senses. Reason is in opposition to sensation, perception, feeling, desire, as the faculty (the existence of which is denied by empiricists) by which fundamental truths are intuitively apprehended. These fundamental truths are the causes or “reasons” of all derivative facts.


A priori knowledge, in Western philosophy since the time of Immanuel Kant, knowledge that is acquired independently of any particular experience, as opposed to a posteriori knowledge, which is derived from experience. The Latin phrases a priori (“from what is before”) and a posteriori (“from what is after”) were used in philosophy originally to distinguish between arguments from causes and arguments from effects.


And so on and so forth.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16339
Gender: male
Re: So what is truth? Is truth unchanging law?
Reply #23 - Feb 26th, 2024 at 10:36am
 
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 9:34am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 9:24am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 9:13am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 8:57am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 8:36am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:48am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:46am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:20am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:15am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 6:03am:
Frank wrote on Feb 16th, 2024 at 10:51am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 16th, 2024 at 9:20am:
We both have truths. Are mine the same as yours? - Jesus Christ Superstar.

There is likely an unbridgeable chasm between absolute truth and doubt, with a convincing illusion of its apprehension possible by faith.

Is that true? Or is it a mere illusion?


Mathematical truths are absolute. Not to be confused with moral truths which are, by necessity/definition, contingent.

Mathematical truths are absolute only in that we agree their axioms are, e.g. 'there are no round squares'.




A priori statements, being independent of experience or observation, are not matters for agreement or disagreement.

Only a Bbwian would disagree with an a priori truth. Or greatdivide. Or Smiff.  Our in-house intellectuals. Tsk, tsk  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

When does a right triangle contain more than one 90-degree angle?


A triangle cannot have more than one angle of 90 degrees.


Unless you draw one on a sphere.

Not under the conditions I stated:

A triangle has 3 angles.
The three angles amount to 180 degrees.
A right angle is 90 degrees.

So it is the definition of a triangle as a product of your mind, then.

You don't really think that.
You well know if 3 of ANYTHING is 180 and one of that 3 is 90 then the other two must be 90 when combined, therefore only 1 of that 3 can be 90.

There  is nothing in there that is a "product of my mind", Bbwian. Tsk, tsk   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Or shall I call you greatdivide? Smiff?


You need to stop obsessing about Brian Ross...

Your mind doesn't extend to a triangle on a sphere where its angles can add to 270.

Not if we start with the axioms of what a triangle is, Bbwian.
A triangle has 3 angles.
The three angles amount to 180 degrees.
A right angle is 90 degrees.

Then your axioms defining what a triangle is in itself, is incomplete, Diedre.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 55065
Gender: male
Re: So what is truth? Is truth unchanging law?
Reply #24 - Feb 26th, 2024 at 11:04am
 
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 10:36am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 9:34am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 9:24am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 9:13am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 8:57am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 8:36am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:48am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:46am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:20am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 7:15am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 6:03am:
Frank wrote on Feb 16th, 2024 at 10:51am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 16th, 2024 at 9:20am:
We both have truths. Are mine the same as yours? - Jesus Christ Superstar.

There is likely an unbridgeable chasm between absolute truth and doubt, with a convincing illusion of its apprehension possible by faith.

Is that true? Or is it a mere illusion?


Mathematical truths are absolute. Not to be confused with moral truths which are, by necessity/definition, contingent.

Mathematical truths are absolute only in that we agree their axioms are, e.g. 'there are no round squares'.




A priori statements, being independent of experience or observation, are not matters for agreement or disagreement.

Only a Bbwian would disagree with an a priori truth. Or greatdivide. Or Smiff.  Our in-house intellectuals. Tsk, tsk  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

When does a right triangle contain more than one 90-degree angle?


A triangle cannot have more than one angle of 90 degrees.


Unless you draw one on a sphere.

Not under the conditions I stated:

A triangle has 3 angles.
The three angles amount to 180 degrees.
A right angle is 90 degrees.

So it is the definition of a triangle as a product of your mind, then.

You don't really think that.
You well know if 3 of ANYTHING is 180 and one of that 3 is 90 then the other two must be 90 when combined, therefore only 1 of that 3 can be 90.

There  is nothing in there that is a "product of my mind", Bbwian. Tsk, tsk   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Or shall I call you greatdivide? Smiff?


You need to stop obsessing about Brian Ross...

Your mind doesn't extend to a triangle on a sphere where its angles can add to 270.

Not if we start with the axioms of what a triangle is, Bbwian.
A triangle has 3 angles.
The three angles amount to 180 degrees.
A right angle is 90 degrees.

Then your axioms defining what a triangle is in itself, is incomplete, Diedre.

How so?

Provide a different set of axioms and let's see what can and cannot be deducted from them. The operation of logic is not going to change.

Axiom, in logic, an indemonstrable first principle, rule, or maxim, that has found general acceptance or is thought worthy of common acceptance whether by virtue of a claim to intrinsic merit or on the basis of an appeal to self-evidence.

'Completeness' doesn't come into it since that is a different category.




Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16339
Gender: male
Re: So what is truth? Is truth unchanging law?
Reply #25 - Feb 26th, 2024 at 11:12am
 
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 11:04am:
Provide a different set of axioms and let's see what can and cannot be deducted from them. The operation of logic is not going to change.

Axiom, in logic, an indemonstrable first principle, rule, or maxim, that has found general acceptance or is thought worthy of common acceptance whether by virtue of a claim to intrinsic merit or on the basis of an appeal to self-evidence.

'Completeness' doesn't come into it since that is a different category.

A triangle has 3 angles.
Within 2 dimensions, the three angles amount to 180 degrees.
A right angle is 90 degrees.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 55065
Gender: male
Re: So what is truth? Is truth unchanging law?
Reply #26 - Feb 26th, 2024 at 11:53am
 
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 11:12am:
Frank wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 11:04am:
Provide a different set of axioms and let's see what can and cannot be deducted from them. The operation of logic is not going to change.

Axiom, in logic, an indemonstrable first principle, rule, or maxim, that has found general acceptance or is thought worthy of common acceptance whether by virtue of a claim to intrinsic merit or on the basis of an appeal to self-evidence.

'Completeness' doesn't come into it since that is a different category.

A triangle has 3 angles.
Within 2 dimensions, the three angles amount to 180 degrees.
A right angle is 90 degrees.

Different axioms, different deductions.
But the deductions are not random.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 54554
Gender: male
Re: So what is truth? Is truth unchanging law?
Reply #27 - Feb 26th, 2024 at 2:34pm
 
A Scientist will tell you that the Earth is not the center of the Universe - and he/she is 'truthfully' right.

A Spiritualist will tell you that the Earth is the center of 'our' Universe and he/she is also 'truthfully' right.

As 'I' always say:
When there are Eight habitable Regions of the World
and Eight Prime Races of the World...
...there is always more than just 'one' right truth of it all.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16339
Gender: male
Re: So what is truth? Is truth unchanging law?
Reply #28 - Feb 26th, 2024 at 3:44pm
 
Jasin wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 2:34pm:
...there is always more than just 'one' right truth of it all.

Then what is truth?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 54554
Gender: male
Re: So what is truth? Is truth unchanging law?
Reply #29 - Feb 26th, 2024 at 4:01pm
 
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 3:44pm:
Jasin wrote on Feb 26th, 2024 at 2:34pm:
...there is always more than just 'one' right truth of it all.

Then what is truth?

It is 'Life' for life is the first Truth of all.
Knowledge is just the Human interpretation of that Truth.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print