Frank
|
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8 th, 2024 at 10:30am: Frank wrote on Feb 8 th, 2024 at 10:26am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8 th, 2024 at 10:16am: Frank wrote on Feb 8 th, 2024 at 10:04am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8 th, 2024 at 7:40am: Jasin wrote on Feb 7 th, 2024 at 10:35pm: While Rape accusations against Trump, have settled for $$$ out of court. It was all about the 'money'. No. Trump was found to be a rapist in a court of law, by a judge and a jury. No accusation or allegation - a legal fact: Trump is a rapist. No witnesses, just the word of E Carrol about something or nothing 25 years ago. Preposterous. Very significantly, this was DELIBERTALY a CIVIL case, not a criminal one, so threshold of evidence and reasonable doubt did not apply. No guilty verdict could have been reached in any criminal court because there is alsolutely no evidence beyond her word. That is not enough in a criminal case. So it is a complete load of corrupt political BS and character assassination for Democrat political purposes, E Carroll's legal fees paid for by a big Dem donor. Trump was found to be a rapist in a court of law, by a judge and a jury. No accusation or allegation - a legal fact: Trump is a rapist. You defend and worship a rapist. Any comment on the substance, slimey, lying turd, or are you just going to continue parrotting the same idiotic mantra as usual? Very significantly, this was DELIBERTALY a CIVIL case, not a criminal one, so threshold of evidence and reasonable doubt did not apply. No guilty verdict could have been reached in any criminal court because there is alsolutely no evidence beyond her word. That is not enough in a criminal case. So it is a complete load of corrupt political BS and character assassination for Democrat political purposes, E Carroll's legal fees paid for by a big Dem donor. You worship and defend a rapist. One can only imagine why. You are avoiding the point I made slimey, lying turd and you are just going to continue parrotting the same idiotic mantra as usual. I knows exacly why. Very significantly, this was DELIBERTALY a CIVIL case, not a criminal one, so threshold of evidence and reasonable doubt did not apply. No guilty verdict could have been reached in any criminal court because there is alsolutely no evidence beyond her word. That is not enough in a criminal case. So it is a complete load of corrupt political BS and character assassination for Democrat political purposes, E Carroll's legal fees paid for by a big Dem donor. Rape is a crime. Why not a criminal court trial? Comment on the points, Bbbwwianesue, slimey ****wit.
|