lees thinks he is on to something.

1000 windfarms is what, lie 1/1,000,000th of the earth’s surface? Probably much less than that as the “farm” might cover, what 100–1000 acres, the actual towers+blades be a lot less than that.

Yes, the wind generators would generate some heat while making electricity and the towers would soak up the sun’s heat and radiate it at night but it amounts to a butterfly fart in a gale.

A coal fired power station of the same actual output would cause more direct heating than that as well as contribute to greenhouse gases.


An ignoramus of low intelligence and a clown afraid of the change AGW will bring are 99% of the so-called Environment board.

That board has put on like 12K posts in the last, what, 7 years? Pathetic. The Environment MRB is holding OzPol back as is the sheer stupidity in the new Coronavirus board.

I think Booby has done a mass deletion of posts in Environment.

Nevertheless, clean energy has been taking a bigger and bigger share of the energy market.

It has to be so, Carbon Capture and Storage not working.

Need more geothermal energy in the mix, wave and tide power too. Tidal power is predictable./

I am not against some nuclear in the mix but it is expensive and not a flexible way of generating power.

Flexibility is essential when dealing with renewable energy and when running the Qld-NSW-Vic-Tas-SA grid.

LOL, lees repliers, the point of my argument going straight over his head. 

The point:

1. wind farms make up a tiny part of the surface of the globe

2. The area occupied by actual towers/blades is tinier still.

Booby from the safety of Environment where I am banned says I drink too much. No estimate of what/when/how much I drink, of course, the troll just likes to troll.